Shiao Zhao, Xuda Zhang, Yiran Liu, Zhide Liang, Taihe Liang, Senyao Du, Chon In Iao, Sanfan Ng, Ziheng Ning
{"title":"Psychological skills training for sport-related outcomes: An umbrella review of evidence credibility and methodological quality.","authors":"Shiao Zhao, Xuda Zhang, Yiran Liu, Zhide Liang, Taihe Liang, Senyao Du, Chon In Iao, Sanfan Ng, Ziheng Ning","doi":"10.1080/02640414.2026.2715216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Psychological skills training (PST) is widely used in sport, but review-level evidence remains fragmented across interventions, populations, outcomes, and methodological standards. This umbrella review synthesized evidence on PST-related interventions for sport-related outcomes, including athletic performance, psychological outcomes, cognitive performance, and sports injury, and evaluated evidence credibility, certainty, and methodological quality. A systematic literature search was conducted on 21 May 2025 in MEDLINE, PsycInfo, PubMed, Scopus, SportDiscus, Web of Science, and CINAHL Complete. Overall, 61 reviews involving 42,106 participants were included; 35 meta-analyses involving 28,076 participants were eligible for quantitative synthesis, and 26 reviews or meta-analyses involving 14,030 participants were summarized qualitatively. Quantitative findings showed generally positive point estimates for mindfulness-based interventions, imagery practice, music-based interventions, neurofeedback, perceptual-cognitive training, and multiple PST interventions, but most findings were weak or non-significant and certainty was generally very low. Qualitative evidence suggested potential benefits, but conclusions varied according to intervention definition, delivery, outcome measurement, and methodological quality. Evidence was more developed for athletic performance and psychological outcomes than for cognitive performance and sports injury. Overall, PST-related interventions may benefit sport-related outcomes, but conclusions should remain cautious because of low certainty, methodological heterogeneity, and limited evidence credibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":17066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"2752-2773"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2026.2715216","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Psychological skills training (PST) is widely used in sport, but review-level evidence remains fragmented across interventions, populations, outcomes, and methodological standards. This umbrella review synthesized evidence on PST-related interventions for sport-related outcomes, including athletic performance, psychological outcomes, cognitive performance, and sports injury, and evaluated evidence credibility, certainty, and methodological quality. A systematic literature search was conducted on 21 May 2025 in MEDLINE, PsycInfo, PubMed, Scopus, SportDiscus, Web of Science, and CINAHL Complete. Overall, 61 reviews involving 42,106 participants were included; 35 meta-analyses involving 28,076 participants were eligible for quantitative synthesis, and 26 reviews or meta-analyses involving 14,030 participants were summarized qualitatively. Quantitative findings showed generally positive point estimates for mindfulness-based interventions, imagery practice, music-based interventions, neurofeedback, perceptual-cognitive training, and multiple PST interventions, but most findings were weak or non-significant and certainty was generally very low. Qualitative evidence suggested potential benefits, but conclusions varied according to intervention definition, delivery, outcome measurement, and methodological quality. Evidence was more developed for athletic performance and psychological outcomes than for cognitive performance and sports injury. Overall, PST-related interventions may benefit sport-related outcomes, but conclusions should remain cautious because of low certainty, methodological heterogeneity, and limited evidence credibility.
心理技能训练(PST)在体育运动中得到了广泛的应用,但在干预措施、人群、结果和方法标准方面,评价水平的证据仍然是碎片化的。本综述综合了创伤后应激障碍相关干预措施对运动相关结果的影响,包括运动表现、心理结果、认知表现和运动损伤,并评估了证据的可信度、确定性和方法质量。我们于2025年5月21日在MEDLINE、PsycInfo、PubMed、Scopus、SportDiscus、Web of Science和CINAHL Complete进行了系统的文献检索。总共纳入61篇综述,涉及42,106名参与者;35项涉及28,076名受试者的荟萃分析符合定量综合条件,26项涉及14,030名受试者的综述或荟萃分析被定性总结。定量结果显示,基于正念的干预、意象练习、基于音乐的干预、神经反馈、感知认知训练和多重PST干预的得分估计值普遍为正,但大多数发现都很弱或不显著,确定性普遍很低。定性证据表明了潜在的益处,但结论因干预的定义、实施、结果测量和方法质量而异。与认知表现和运动损伤相比,有关运动表现和心理结果的证据更为充分。总体而言,与pst相关的干预措施可能有利于运动相关的结果,但由于确定性低、方法异质性和证据可信度有限,结论仍应保持谨慎。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Sports Sciences has an international reputation for publishing articles of a high standard and is both Medline and Clarivate Analytics-listed. It publishes research on various aspects of the sports and exercise sciences, including anatomy, biochemistry, biomechanics, performance analysis, physiology, psychology, sports medicine and health, as well as coaching and talent identification, kinanthropometry and other interdisciplinary perspectives.
The emphasis of the Journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined and applied to sport and exercise. Besides experimental work in human responses to exercise, the subjects covered will include human responses to technologies such as the design of sports equipment and playing facilities, research in training, selection, performance prediction or modification, and stress reduction or manifestation. Manuscripts considered for publication include those dealing with original investigations of exercise, validation of technological innovations in sport or comprehensive reviews of topics relevant to the scientific study of sport.