Staged Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix and Meek Micrografting as a Donor-Sparing Strategy for Extensive Burn Injuries.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
J Wise, D L Wallace, S A Mason, A D Rogers
{"title":"Staged Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix and Meek Micrografting as a Donor-Sparing Strategy for Extensive Burn Injuries.","authors":"J Wise, D L Wallace, S A Mason, A D Rogers","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/irag128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Definitive closure of extensive burns remains constrained by donor-site availability, particularly in patients with burns of 50% total body surface area (TBSA) or greater. Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix (BTM) can stabilize excised wounds while donor sites recover, whereas Meek micrografting permits controlled expansion of limited autologous skin. We retrospectively reviewed adult patients admitted between May 2022 and May 2025 with burns of 50% TBSA or greater who underwent BTM application followed by Meek micrografting as part of definitive wound-closure management. Demographic, injury, operative, and outcome variables were collected from electronic medical records, operative reports, anesthesia records, wound-care documentation, and clinical photography when available. Twelve patients were included. Mean age was 41.5 years, mean burn size was 63.1% TBSA, and mean Baux score was 104.6. All patients had inhalation injury and required tracheostomy. BTM was applied at a mean of 13.3 days after admission, and Meek micrografting was performed at a mean of 42.2 days. Mean TBSA covered by Meek micrografting was 32.5%, representing 50.6% of the burn surface. Operative efficiency improved from 15.2 to approximately 10.8 minutes per 1% TBSA covered over the study period. Clinically documented Meek graft take exceeded 90% in evaluable cases, no patient required secondary autografting of Meek-grafted BTM areas, and 11 of 12 survived to discharge or inpatient rehabilitation. Staged BTM followed by Meek micrografting is a feasible donor-sparing strategy for extensive burn closure that permits special-area prioritization, donor-site recovery, and efficient definitive coverage of large prepared wound surfaces.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irag128","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Definitive closure of extensive burns remains constrained by donor-site availability, particularly in patients with burns of 50% total body surface area (TBSA) or greater. Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix (BTM) can stabilize excised wounds while donor sites recover, whereas Meek micrografting permits controlled expansion of limited autologous skin. We retrospectively reviewed adult patients admitted between May 2022 and May 2025 with burns of 50% TBSA or greater who underwent BTM application followed by Meek micrografting as part of definitive wound-closure management. Demographic, injury, operative, and outcome variables were collected from electronic medical records, operative reports, anesthesia records, wound-care documentation, and clinical photography when available. Twelve patients were included. Mean age was 41.5 years, mean burn size was 63.1% TBSA, and mean Baux score was 104.6. All patients had inhalation injury and required tracheostomy. BTM was applied at a mean of 13.3 days after admission, and Meek micrografting was performed at a mean of 42.2 days. Mean TBSA covered by Meek micrografting was 32.5%, representing 50.6% of the burn surface. Operative efficiency improved from 15.2 to approximately 10.8 minutes per 1% TBSA covered over the study period. Clinically documented Meek graft take exceeded 90% in evaluable cases, no patient required secondary autografting of Meek-grafted BTM areas, and 11 of 12 survived to discharge or inpatient rehabilitation. Staged BTM followed by Meek micrografting is a feasible donor-sparing strategy for extensive burn closure that permits special-area prioritization, donor-site recovery, and efficient definitive coverage of large prepared wound surfaces.

分期可生物降解的临时基质和Meek微移植作为大面积烧伤的供体保留策略。
广泛烧伤的最终闭合仍然受到供体部位可用性的限制,特别是在烧伤总面积(TBSA) 50%或以上的患者中。可生物降解的临时基质(BTM)可以在供体部位恢复时稳定切除的伤口,而Meek微移植可以控制有限的自体皮肤的扩张。我们回顾性回顾了2022年5月至2025年5月期间入院的成年患者,这些患者的烧伤面积为50%或更大,他们接受了BTM应用,随后进行了Meek微移植,作为最终伤口闭合管理的一部分。从电子病历、手术报告、麻醉记录、伤口护理文件和临床照片中收集人口统计学、损伤、手术和结局变量。纳入12例患者。平均年龄41.5岁,平均烧伤面积为63.1% TBSA,平均Baux评分为104.6。所有患者均有吸入性损伤,需要气管切开术。BTM于入院后平均13.3天应用,Meek显微移植平均42.2天。Meek显微移植覆盖的TBSA平均为32.5%,占烧伤表面的50.6%。在研究期间,手术效率从每1% TBSA 15.2分钟提高到约10.8分钟。在可评估的病例中,临床记录的Meek移植成功率超过90%,没有患者需要对Meek移植的BTM区域进行二次自体移植,12例患者中有11例存活至出院或住院康复。分阶段BTM随后Meek微移植是一种可行的保留供体的策略,用于大面积烧伤愈合,允许特殊区域优先,供体部位恢复,并有效地覆盖大面积准备好的创面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书