Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Clinical Outcomes: A Non-Inferiority Comparison of The Novel Felix™ Electrophoretic System and Conventional Density Gradient Centrifugation for Sperm Selection, A Prospective Clinical Trial.

IF 2.2 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Bahareh Ghazavi, Marziyeh Tavalaee, Farnaz Shapouri, Niloofar Sadeghi, Mohammad Hasan Najafi, Hassan W Bakos, Robert J Aitken, Mohammad Hossein Nasr-Esfahani
{"title":"Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Clinical Outcomes: A Non-Inferiority Comparison of The Novel Felix™ Electrophoretic System and Conventional Density Gradient Centrifugation for Sperm Selection, A Prospective Clinical Trial.","authors":"Bahareh Ghazavi, Marziyeh Tavalaee, Farnaz Shapouri, Niloofar Sadeghi, Mohammad Hasan Najafi, Hassan W Bakos, Robert J Aitken, Mohammad Hossein Nasr-Esfahani","doi":"10.22074/ijfs.2025.2061310.1878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), sperm selection has traditionally relied on motility and morphology, often overlooking DNA integrity. This study evaluates the Felix™ Electrophoretic System, which isolates sperm based on membrane surface electric charge, by assessing its effectiveness in selecting motile sperm with intact DNA and comparing ICSI clinical outcomes between the Felix™ system and density gradient centrifugation (DGC) in sibling oocytes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this prospective clinical trial study, semen samples from 25 infertile couples were processed using both DGC and the Felix™ sperm preparation system. For ICSI, oocytes were fertilized with sperm prepared by each method. Embryo development was monitored using time-lapse imaging, and embryo quality was assessed on day 5 post-ICSI. The highest-quality embryo from each group was selected for transfer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fertilization rates and blastocyst quality were comparable between the two groups. Although the Felix ™ group exhibited a higher proportion of high-quality blastocysts than the DGC group, this difference was not statistically significant (P=0.220). The number of embryo transfers per couple varied depending on the availability of transferable embryos. In total, 16 embryo transfers were performed in the Felix™ group, resulting in a 37% clinical pregnancy rate, whereas 11 transfers were performed in the DGC group, resulting in a 36% clinical pregnancy rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This pilot study demonstrated that the Felix™ system provides assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes comparable to those of DGC, while requiring less semen and time and avoiding centrifugal stress. However, larger studies and additional functional and long-term evaluations are needed to confirm its efficacy, safety, and impact on offspring health (registration number: IRCT20110804007223N11).</p>","PeriodicalId":14080,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Fertility & Sterility","volume":"20 Suppl 1","pages":"39-47"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13458882/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Fertility & Sterility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22074/ijfs.2025.2061310.1878","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), sperm selection has traditionally relied on motility and morphology, often overlooking DNA integrity. This study evaluates the Felix™ Electrophoretic System, which isolates sperm based on membrane surface electric charge, by assessing its effectiveness in selecting motile sperm with intact DNA and comparing ICSI clinical outcomes between the Felix™ system and density gradient centrifugation (DGC) in sibling oocytes.

Materials and methods: In this prospective clinical trial study, semen samples from 25 infertile couples were processed using both DGC and the Felix™ sperm preparation system. For ICSI, oocytes were fertilized with sperm prepared by each method. Embryo development was monitored using time-lapse imaging, and embryo quality was assessed on day 5 post-ICSI. The highest-quality embryo from each group was selected for transfer.

Results: Fertilization rates and blastocyst quality were comparable between the two groups. Although the Felix ™ group exhibited a higher proportion of high-quality blastocysts than the DGC group, this difference was not statistically significant (P=0.220). The number of embryo transfers per couple varied depending on the availability of transferable embryos. In total, 16 embryo transfers were performed in the Felix™ group, resulting in a 37% clinical pregnancy rate, whereas 11 transfers were performed in the DGC group, resulting in a 36% clinical pregnancy rate.

Conclusion: This pilot study demonstrated that the Felix™ system provides assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes comparable to those of DGC, while requiring less semen and time and avoiding centrifugal stress. However, larger studies and additional functional and long-term evaluations are needed to confirm its efficacy, safety, and impact on offspring health (registration number: IRCT20110804007223N11).

细胞质内精子注射临床结果:新型Felix™电泳系统和传统密度梯度离心精子选择的非劣效性比较,一项前瞻性临床试验。
目的:在卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)中,传统的精子选择依赖于活力和形态,往往忽略了DNA的完整性。本研究评估了Felix™电泳系统,该系统基于膜表面电荷分离精子,通过评估其在选择具有完整DNA的活动精子方面的有效性,并比较了Felix™系统和密度梯度离心(DGC)在兄弟姐妹卵母细胞中的ICSI临床结果。材料和方法:在这项前瞻性临床试验研究中,使用DGC和Felix™精子制备系统处理25对不育夫妇的精液样本。对于ICSI,卵母细胞与每种方法制备的精子受精。采用延时成像技术监测胚胎发育,并在icsi后第5天评估胚胎质量。每组中选择质量最高的胚胎进行移植。结果:两组受精率和囊胚质量相当。虽然Felix™组的高质量囊胚比例高于DGC组,但差异无统计学意义(P=0.220)。每对夫妇的胚胎移植数量取决于可移植胚胎的可用性。Felix™组总共进行了16例胚胎移植,临床妊娠率为37%,而DGC组进行了11例胚胎移植,临床妊娠率为36%。结论:本初步研究表明,Felix™系统提供了与DGC相当的辅助生殖技术(ART)结果,同时需要更少的精液和时间,避免了离心应力。然而,需要更大规模的研究和额外的功能和长期评估来确认其有效性、安全性和对后代健康的影响(注册号:IRCT20110804007223N11)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Fertility & Sterility is a quarterly English publication of Royan Institute . The aim of the journal is to disseminate information through publishing the most recent scientific research studies on Fertility and Sterility and other related topics. Int J Fertil Steril has been certified by Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance in 2007 and was accredited as a scientific and research journal by HBI (Health and Biomedical Information) Journal Accreditation Commission in 2008. Int J Fertil Steril is an Open Access journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书