Evaluating home-delivered meal service programs for obesity: a randomized controlled approach.

IF 4.5 4区 医学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Food & Nutrition Research Pub Date : 2026-05-07 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.29219/fnr.v70.12024
Merve Çapaş, Aylin Ayaz
{"title":"Evaluating home-delivered meal service programs for obesity: a randomized controlled approach.","authors":"Merve Çapaş, Aylin Ayaz","doi":"10.29219/fnr.v70.12024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Though a healthy diet is the most effective solution for obesity, it is hindered by two main barriers: difficulty in accessing or preparing healthy meals and lack of portion control knowledge.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study compared two different medical nutrition therapies (home-delivered diet meal service [HDMS] combined with dietary counseling and dietary counseling solely) in terms of anthropometric measurements, biochemical parameters and eating behaviors in women with overweight or obesity who participated in a weight loss program.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A non-randomized, controlled, parallel-group intervention study was conducted with 60 women aged 25-45 years, having a Body Mass Index (BMI) of 25-35 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, representing individuals with overweight and class I obesity. Participants were divided into two groups: an intervention group receiving HDMS combined with dietary counseling (<i>n</i> = 30) and a control group receiving dietary counseling solely (<i>n</i> = 30). Anthropometric measurements, bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and dietary and physical activity records were monitored throughout the 8-week intervention, while comprehensive assessments including biochemical parameters (fasting blood glucose, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), lipid profile), resting metabolic rate (RMR) (FITMATE), and eating behaviors assessed using the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ) were conducted at baseline, week 4, and week 8.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed significant reductions over time in body weight, BMI, waist circumference, hip circumference, body fat percentage, RMR, blood glucose, lipid parameters, and blood pressure values (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Although greater reductions were observed in the HDMS group, the differences between groups were not statistically significant (<i>P</i> > 0.05). When considering the group-time interaction, changes in waist circumference (<i>P</i> < 0.001), hip circumference (<i>P</i> < 0.05), RMR (<i>P</i> < 0.05), fasting blood glucose (<i>P</i> < 0.05), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), cholesterol (<i>P</i> < 0.05), and systolic blood pressure (<i>P</i> < 0.05) were found to be significant in the HDMS group. In addition, when examining eating behaviors, statistically significant changes were observed in the intervention group for both time effects and behavior outcomes. Uncontrolled eating and emotional eating behaviors decreased, while cognitive restraint increased (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both interventions improved anthropometric and metabolic parameters, with greater reductions observed in the HDMS group; however, the differences between groups were not statistically significant. HDMS may be considered a practical approach to support weight management.</p>","PeriodicalId":12119,"journal":{"name":"Food & Nutrition Research","volume":"70 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13452270/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food & Nutrition Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29219/fnr.v70.12024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Though a healthy diet is the most effective solution for obesity, it is hindered by two main barriers: difficulty in accessing or preparing healthy meals and lack of portion control knowledge.

Objective: This study compared two different medical nutrition therapies (home-delivered diet meal service [HDMS] combined with dietary counseling and dietary counseling solely) in terms of anthropometric measurements, biochemical parameters and eating behaviors in women with overweight or obesity who participated in a weight loss program.

Design: A non-randomized, controlled, parallel-group intervention study was conducted with 60 women aged 25-45 years, having a Body Mass Index (BMI) of 25-35 kg/m2, representing individuals with overweight and class I obesity. Participants were divided into two groups: an intervention group receiving HDMS combined with dietary counseling (n = 30) and a control group receiving dietary counseling solely (n = 30). Anthropometric measurements, bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and dietary and physical activity records were monitored throughout the 8-week intervention, while comprehensive assessments including biochemical parameters (fasting blood glucose, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), lipid profile), resting metabolic rate (RMR) (FITMATE), and eating behaviors assessed using the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ) were conducted at baseline, week 4, and week 8.

Results: Both groups showed significant reductions over time in body weight, BMI, waist circumference, hip circumference, body fat percentage, RMR, blood glucose, lipid parameters, and blood pressure values (P < 0.001). Although greater reductions were observed in the HDMS group, the differences between groups were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). When considering the group-time interaction, changes in waist circumference (P < 0.001), hip circumference (P < 0.05), RMR (P < 0.05), fasting blood glucose (P < 0.05), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), cholesterol (P < 0.05), and systolic blood pressure (P < 0.05) were found to be significant in the HDMS group. In addition, when examining eating behaviors, statistically significant changes were observed in the intervention group for both time effects and behavior outcomes. Uncontrolled eating and emotional eating behaviors decreased, while cognitive restraint increased (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Both interventions improved anthropometric and metabolic parameters, with greater reductions observed in the HDMS group; however, the differences between groups were not statistically significant. HDMS may be considered a practical approach to support weight management.

评估肥胖家庭送餐服务计划:随机对照方法。
背景:虽然健康饮食是肥胖最有效的解决方案,但它受到两个主要障碍的阻碍:难以获取或准备健康膳食以及缺乏分量控制知识。目的:本研究比较了两种不同的医学营养疗法(家庭送餐服务结合饮食咨询和单独饮食咨询)在参与减肥计划的超重或肥胖女性的人体测量、生化参数和饮食行为方面的差异。设计:对60名年龄在25-45岁、体重指数(BMI)为25-35 kg/m2的女性进行非随机、对照、平行组干预研究,代表超重和I级肥胖个体。参与者被分为两组:干预组接受HDMS结合饮食咨询(n = 30)和对照组接受饮食咨询(n = 30)。在整个8周的干预期间,对人体测量、生物电阻抗分析(BIA)、饮食和身体活动记录进行监测,同时在基线、第4周和第8周进行综合评估,包括生化参数(空腹血糖、胰岛素抵抗的稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR)、血脂)、静息代谢率(RMR)和使用三因素饮食问卷(TFEQ)评估饮食行为。结果:两组的体重、BMI、腰围、臀围、体脂率、RMR、血糖、脂质参数和血压值均随时间显著降低(P < 0.001)。虽然HDMS组降低幅度更大,但组间差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。考虑组间相互作用,HDMS组腰围(P < 0.001)、臀围(P < 0.05)、RMR (P < 0.05)、空腹血糖(P < 0.05)、低密度脂蛋白(LDL)、胆固醇(P < 0.05)、收缩压(P < 0.05)的变化具有显著性。此外,在检查饮食行为时,干预组在时间效应和行为结果方面都观察到统计学上显著的变化。无节制饮食和情绪性饮食行为减少,认知约束行为增加(P < 0.001)。结论:两种干预措施都改善了人体测量和代谢参数,HDMS组的降低幅度更大;然而,组间差异无统计学意义。HDMS可以被认为是支持体重管理的实用方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food & Nutrition Research
Food & Nutrition Research FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-NUTRITION & DIETETICS
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
47
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Food & Nutrition Research is a peer-reviewed journal that presents the latest scientific research in various fields focusing on human nutrition. The journal publishes both quantitative and qualitative research papers. Through an Open Access publishing model, Food & Nutrition Research opens an important forum for researchers from academic and private arenas to exchange the latest results from research on human nutrition in a broad sense, both original papers and reviews, including: * Associations and effects of foods and nutrients on health * Dietary patterns and health * Molecular nutrition * Health claims on foods * Nutrition and cognitive functions * Nutritional effects of food composition and processing * Nutrition in developing countries * Animal and in vitro models with clear relevance for human nutrition * Nutrition and the Environment * Food and Nutrition Education * Nutrition and Economics Research papers on food chemistry (focus on chemical composition and analysis of foods) are generally not considered eligible, unless the results have a clear impact on human nutrition. The journal focuses on the different aspects of nutrition for people involved in nutrition research such as Dentists, Dieticians, Medical doctors, Nutritionists, Teachers, Journalists and Manufacturers in the food and pharmaceutical industries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书