Increased Blood Urea Nitrogen-To-Creatinine Ratio is an Independent Predictor of Mortality in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Hongyan Zhao, Hui Cheng, Chaofeng Huang, Maowen Huang, Dan Li, Fangchao Mei
{"title":"Increased Blood Urea Nitrogen-To-Creatinine Ratio is an Independent Predictor of Mortality in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease.","authors":"Hongyan Zhao, Hui Cheng, Chaofeng Huang, Maowen Huang, Dan Li, Fangchao Mei","doi":"10.7754/Clin.Lab.2025.250736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is the final phase of chronic kidney disease, characterized by severe renal dysfunction that leads to metabolic disturbances in blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and serum creatinine (Scr). Currently, the relationship between the BUN/creatinine ratio (BCR) and all-cause mortality in patients with ESRD remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the predictive value of BCR for short-term (60-day) and intermediate-term (365-day) all-cause mortality risk in patients with ESRD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>By using data from the MIMIC-IV database, we included patients with ESRD meeting ICD-9/ICD-10 diagnostic criteria, excluding those aged < 18 years, non-intensive care unit admissions, and those with incomplete information, ultimately enrolling 2,102 patients. The participants were stratified according to the BCR quartiles. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariate Cox regression were used to compare differences in all-cause mortality between the groups. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis was used to examine the dose-response relationship between BCR and all-cause mortality. Subgroup analysis was used to assess result stability, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to compare the predictive performance of BCR versus individual markers (BUN or Scr).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 2,102 patients with ESRD. The results demonstrated a positive correlation between BCR and 60- and 365-day all-cause mortality rates. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that each one-unit increase in BCR was associated with a 3% higher risk of 60-day all-cause mortality (HR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01 - 1.04) and 365-day all-cause mortality (HR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01 - 1.04). The RCS analysis showed a linear relationship between BCR and 60-day all-cause mortality (p-overall < 0.001, p-non-linear = 0.237), whereas a non-linear relationship was observed for 365-day all-cause mortality (p-overall < 0.001, p-non-linear = 0.018). The subgroup analysis revealed no significant interaction effects. ROC analysis indicated the superior predictive performance of BCR compared to BUN or Scr alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BCR serves as an independent predictor of all-cause mortality risk in patients with ESRD and may provide a novel reference index for clinical prognosis assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10384,"journal":{"name":"Clinical laboratory","volume":"72 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical laboratory","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2025.250736","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is the final phase of chronic kidney disease, characterized by severe renal dysfunction that leads to metabolic disturbances in blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and serum creatinine (Scr). Currently, the relationship between the BUN/creatinine ratio (BCR) and all-cause mortality in patients with ESRD remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the predictive value of BCR for short-term (60-day) and intermediate-term (365-day) all-cause mortality risk in patients with ESRD.

Methods: By using data from the MIMIC-IV database, we included patients with ESRD meeting ICD-9/ICD-10 diagnostic criteria, excluding those aged < 18 years, non-intensive care unit admissions, and those with incomplete information, ultimately enrolling 2,102 patients. The participants were stratified according to the BCR quartiles. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariate Cox regression were used to compare differences in all-cause mortality between the groups. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis was used to examine the dose-response relationship between BCR and all-cause mortality. Subgroup analysis was used to assess result stability, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to compare the predictive performance of BCR versus individual markers (BUN or Scr).

Results: This study included 2,102 patients with ESRD. The results demonstrated a positive correlation between BCR and 60- and 365-day all-cause mortality rates. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that each one-unit increase in BCR was associated with a 3% higher risk of 60-day all-cause mortality (HR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01 - 1.04) and 365-day all-cause mortality (HR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01 - 1.04). The RCS analysis showed a linear relationship between BCR and 60-day all-cause mortality (p-overall < 0.001, p-non-linear = 0.237), whereas a non-linear relationship was observed for 365-day all-cause mortality (p-overall < 0.001, p-non-linear = 0.018). The subgroup analysis revealed no significant interaction effects. ROC analysis indicated the superior predictive performance of BCR compared to BUN or Scr alone.

Conclusions: BCR serves as an independent predictor of all-cause mortality risk in patients with ESRD and may provide a novel reference index for clinical prognosis assessment.

血尿素氮与肌酐比值升高是终末期肾病患者死亡率的独立预测因子
背景:终末期肾病(End-stage renal disease, ESRD)是慢性肾脏疾病的最后阶段,以严重肾功能障碍为特征,导致血尿素氮(BUN)和血清肌酐(Scr)代谢紊乱。目前,ESRD患者BUN/肌酐比值(BCR)与全因死亡率之间的关系尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨BCR对ESRD患者短期(60天)和中期(365天)全因死亡风险的预测价值。方法:通过使用MIMIC-IV数据库的数据,我们纳入了符合ICD-9/ICD-10诊断标准的ESRD患者,排除了年龄< 18岁、非重症监护病房入院和信息不完整的患者,最终纳入了2102例患者。根据BCR四分位数对参与者进行分层。采用Kaplan-Meier生存分析和多变量Cox回归比较各组全因死亡率的差异。使用限制性三次样条(RCS)分析来检验BCR与全因死亡率之间的剂量-反应关系。采用亚组分析评估结果的稳定性,并采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线比较BCR与个体标记物(BUN或Scr)的预测性能。结果:本研究纳入了2102例ESRD患者。结果显示BCR与60天和365天全因死亡率呈正相关。多因素Cox回归分析显示,BCR每增加1个单位,60天全因死亡率(HR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01 - 1.04)和365天全因死亡率(HR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01 - 1.04)的风险增加3%。RCS分析显示,BCR与60天全因死亡率呈线性关系(p-overall < 0.001, p- nonlinear = 0.237),而365天全因死亡率呈非线性关系(p-overall < 0.001, p- nonlinear = 0.018)。亚组分析显示没有显著的相互作用。ROC分析显示,BCR的预测效果优于单独的BUN或Scr。结论:BCR可作为ESRD患者全因死亡风险的独立预测因子,为临床预后评估提供新的参考指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical laboratory
Clinical laboratory 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
494
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Laboratory is an international fully peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of laboratory medicine and transfusion medicine. In addition to transfusion medicine topics Clinical Laboratory represents submissions concerning tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular and gene therapies. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, posters, short reports, case studies and letters to the editor dealing with 1) the scientific background, implementation and diagnostic significance of laboratory methods employed in hospitals, blood banks and physicians'' offices and with 2) scientific, administrative and clinical aspects of transfusion medicine and 3) in addition to transfusion medicine topics Clinical Laboratory represents submissions concerning tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular and gene therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书