The role of intelligence in PTSD treatment outcomes: evidence from a multicenter TF-CBT trial with youth.

IF 4.9 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Sabrina Berardi, Hanna Christiansen, Sebastian Deutscher, David Daniel Ebert, Rebekka Eilers, Katharina Gossmann, Anne Grass, Lena Jaworski, Johanna Kneidinger, Rita Rosner, Katharina Szota, Anna-Carlotta Zarski, Regina Steil
{"title":"The role of intelligence in PTSD treatment outcomes: evidence from a multicenter TF-CBT trial with youth.","authors":"Sabrina Berardi, Hanna Christiansen, Sebastian Deutscher, David Daniel Ebert, Rebekka Eilers, Katharina Gossmann, Anne Grass, Lena Jaworski, Johanna Kneidinger, Rita Rosner, Katharina Szota, Anna-Carlotta Zarski, Regina Steil","doi":"10.1186/s13034-026-01149-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cognitive ability has been linked to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) vulnerability and may influence trauma-focused treatment response, yet its role in youth Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT) outcomes remains unclear. Clarifying this issue is relevant for equitable access to evidence-based care. We examined whether formally assessed IQ was associated with PTSD symptom change from pre- to post-treatment based on youth and caregiver reports and with treatment dropout in children and adolescents undergoing TF-CBT after abuse or neglect.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data came from N = 320 youth aged 5-21 years from a randomized clinical effectiveness trial. Intelligence quotient (IQ) was assessed with standardized tests, PTSD symptoms with the Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen (CATS-2), and dropout was defined as not completing therapy as intended. Symptom change was calculated as post- (T1) minus pre-treatment (T0) and evaluated separately for youth and caregiver reports. Regression models included age, gender, baseline PTSD severity, and treatment satisfaction assessed after treatment as an additional model variable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean IQ was M = 97.41 (SD = 13.19, range = 51-138). PTSD severity was high at baseline (M = 34.21, SD = 8.09) and decreased substantially (ΔCATS-2<sub>T1 ₋ T0</sub> youth report: M = -17.54, SD = 12.34; Cohen's d paired = 1.42). IQ showed small but significant negative correlations with symptom change in youth reports (r = -.14, p = .040) and caregiver reports (r = -.17, p = .018), indicating greater symptom reductions at higher IQ. In regressions, IQ was not a significant predictor in the youth-report model (β = -.10, p = .077), while a small effect remained in the caregiver-report model (β = -.15, p = .011). Baseline PTSD severity and post-treatment satisfaction showed more consistent associations with symptom reduction. Dropout was 29.1%. IQ neither differed between completers and dropouts nor was associated with dropout in logistic regression (OR = 0.99, p = .536), whereas higher post-treatment satisfaction was associated with lower dropout risk.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>TF-CBT was associated with substantial symptom reductions across the observed IQ range, suggesting its suitability for routine care without excluding youth solely on the basis of cognitive ability. Baseline severity and treatment satisfaction at post-treatment showed stronger associations with symptom change and dropout than IQ. Trial registration The BESTFORCAN study was registered in the German Clinical Trial Registry (DRKS00020516) on 12 February 2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":9934,"journal":{"name":"Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13453091/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-026-01149-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cognitive ability has been linked to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) vulnerability and may influence trauma-focused treatment response, yet its role in youth Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT) outcomes remains unclear. Clarifying this issue is relevant for equitable access to evidence-based care. We examined whether formally assessed IQ was associated with PTSD symptom change from pre- to post-treatment based on youth and caregiver reports and with treatment dropout in children and adolescents undergoing TF-CBT after abuse or neglect.

Method: Data came from N = 320 youth aged 5-21 years from a randomized clinical effectiveness trial. Intelligence quotient (IQ) was assessed with standardized tests, PTSD symptoms with the Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen (CATS-2), and dropout was defined as not completing therapy as intended. Symptom change was calculated as post- (T1) minus pre-treatment (T0) and evaluated separately for youth and caregiver reports. Regression models included age, gender, baseline PTSD severity, and treatment satisfaction assessed after treatment as an additional model variable.

Results: Mean IQ was M = 97.41 (SD = 13.19, range = 51-138). PTSD severity was high at baseline (M = 34.21, SD = 8.09) and decreased substantially (ΔCATS-2T1 ₋ T0 youth report: M = -17.54, SD = 12.34; Cohen's d paired = 1.42). IQ showed small but significant negative correlations with symptom change in youth reports (r = -.14, p = .040) and caregiver reports (r = -.17, p = .018), indicating greater symptom reductions at higher IQ. In regressions, IQ was not a significant predictor in the youth-report model (β = -.10, p = .077), while a small effect remained in the caregiver-report model (β = -.15, p = .011). Baseline PTSD severity and post-treatment satisfaction showed more consistent associations with symptom reduction. Dropout was 29.1%. IQ neither differed between completers and dropouts nor was associated with dropout in logistic regression (OR = 0.99, p = .536), whereas higher post-treatment satisfaction was associated with lower dropout risk.

Discussion: TF-CBT was associated with substantial symptom reductions across the observed IQ range, suggesting its suitability for routine care without excluding youth solely on the basis of cognitive ability. Baseline severity and treatment satisfaction at post-treatment showed stronger associations with symptom change and dropout than IQ. Trial registration The BESTFORCAN study was registered in the German Clinical Trial Registry (DRKS00020516) on 12 February 2020.

智力在创伤后应激障碍治疗结果中的作用:来自青少年多中心TF-CBT试验的证据
导读:认知能力与创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的脆弱性有关,并可能影响以创伤为重点的治疗反应,但其在青少年创伤为重点的认知行为治疗(TF-CBT)结果中的作用尚不清楚。澄清这一问题与公平获得循证护理有关。根据青少年和护理人员的报告,我们研究了正式评估的智商是否与治疗前到治疗后PTSD症状的改变有关,以及与儿童和青少年在遭受虐待或忽视后接受TF-CBT治疗的中途退出有关。方法:数据来自一项随机临床疗效试验,N = 320名5-21岁的青少年。通过标准化测试评估智商(IQ),儿童和青少年创伤筛查(CATS-2)评估创伤后应激障碍症状,并将未完成治疗定义为辍学。症状变化计算为治疗后(T1)减去治疗前(T0),并分别对青少年和护理人员报告进行评估。回归模型包括年龄、性别、基线PTSD严重程度和治疗后评估的治疗满意度作为附加模型变量。结果:平均智商M = 97.41 (SD = 13.19,范围51 ~ 138)。创伤后应激障碍的严重程度在基线时较高(M = 34.21, SD = 8.09),并大幅下降(ΔCATS-2T1 ̄0青年报告:M = -17.54, SD = 12.34; Cohen’SD配对= 1.42)。智商与青少年报告的症状变化呈微小但显著的负相关(r = - 0.14, p =。040)和护理人员报告(r = - 0.17, p =。018),这表明智商越高,症状减轻的程度越高。在回归中,智商在青年报告模型中不是一个显著的预测因子(β = - 0.10, p =。077),而在护理人员报告模型中仍然存在较小的影响(β = - 0.15, p = 0.011)。基线PTSD严重程度和治疗后满意度与症状减轻的关系更为一致。辍学率为29.1%。在逻辑回归中,智商在完成者和辍学者之间没有差异,也与辍学者无关(OR = 0.99, p =。536),而较高的治疗后满意度与较低的辍学风险相关。讨论:TF-CBT与观察到的智商范围内的实质性症状减轻有关,表明它适合常规护理,而不是仅仅基于认知能力排除年轻人。治疗后的基线严重程度和治疗满意度与症状改变和辍学的相关性强于智商。BESTFORCAN研究于2020年2月12日在德国临床试验注册中心(DRKS00020516)注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health PEDIATRICSPSYCHIATRY-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
84
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, the official journal of the International Association for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Allied Professions, is an open access, online journal that provides an international platform for rapid and comprehensive scientific communication on child and adolescent mental health across different cultural backgrounds. CAPMH serves as a scientifically rigorous and broadly open forum for both interdisciplinary and cross-cultural exchange of research information, involving psychiatrists, paediatricians, psychologists, neuroscientists, and allied disciplines. The journal focusses on improving the knowledge base for the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of mental health conditions in children and adolescents, and aims to integrate basic science, clinical research and the practical implementation of research findings. In addition, aspects which are still underrepresented in the traditional journals such as neurobiology and neuropsychology of psychiatric disorders in childhood and adolescence are considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书