Perception of Medical Laboratory Professionals on the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Advancing Hematology Diagnostics.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Talal Qadah
{"title":"Perception of Medical Laboratory Professionals on the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Advancing Hematology Diagnostics.","authors":"Talal Qadah","doi":"10.7754/Clin.Lab.2025.251103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial Intelligence (AI) has grown quickly in healthcare and has had a big effect on medical laboratory diagnostics, especially when it comes to diagnosing blood disorders. To figure out the pros and cons of using AI in hematology diagnostics, it is important to understand the perspective of medical laboratory workers instead of specialists toward AI use in hematology laboratory diagnostics. The goal of this study was to investigate what medical lab workers now know about AI and how they think it affects the accuracy of diagnostic hematology and patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Methods involved 113 participants, mostly laboratory technologists who filled out a standardized questionnaire as part of a quantitative exploratory research design. The data collection phase lasted 6 months, during which time-informed consent was sought and reminders were provided to boost response rates. Statistical tests were used including t-tests and regression analysis to determine the links between demographic factors and workers opinions on AI in hematological diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary findings of this study dwell within the role of job skill and gender influence on \"attitude\", specifically, the study found that most of the participants believe that their professional attitude to adoption of AI in diagnoses could make their job more accurate and faster. However, there were several concerns about the quality of data, how easy it will be to understand the model, and the moral implications. There were positive relationships between knowledge, attitudes, and practices linked to AI. The secondary outcomes showed that most of the participants were young, with 45.1% being between the ages of 30 and 39. In addition, 65.5% of them had bachelor's degree, which suggests that they were comfortable with technology. Some of the participants had less than ten years of work experience, while others had more than ten years. Statistical tests demonstrated that demographic characteristics are quite important in how medical laboratory workers think about AI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medical laboratory workers believe that the use of AI in hematology diagnostics has its benefits, but they need more training and assistance to deal with their fears and create a space where human expertise and AI technologies can work together. By taking these views into account, healthcare organizations may better educate their staff for the changing role of AI in diagnostics, which will lead to improved patient outcomes and satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":10384,"journal":{"name":"Clinical laboratory","volume":"72 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical laboratory","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2025.251103","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Artificial Intelligence (AI) has grown quickly in healthcare and has had a big effect on medical laboratory diagnostics, especially when it comes to diagnosing blood disorders. To figure out the pros and cons of using AI in hematology diagnostics, it is important to understand the perspective of medical laboratory workers instead of specialists toward AI use in hematology laboratory diagnostics. The goal of this study was to investigate what medical lab workers now know about AI and how they think it affects the accuracy of diagnostic hematology and patient outcomes.

Methods: Methods involved 113 participants, mostly laboratory technologists who filled out a standardized questionnaire as part of a quantitative exploratory research design. The data collection phase lasted 6 months, during which time-informed consent was sought and reminders were provided to boost response rates. Statistical tests were used including t-tests and regression analysis to determine the links between demographic factors and workers opinions on AI in hematological diagnoses.

Results: The primary findings of this study dwell within the role of job skill and gender influence on "attitude", specifically, the study found that most of the participants believe that their professional attitude to adoption of AI in diagnoses could make their job more accurate and faster. However, there were several concerns about the quality of data, how easy it will be to understand the model, and the moral implications. There were positive relationships between knowledge, attitudes, and practices linked to AI. The secondary outcomes showed that most of the participants were young, with 45.1% being between the ages of 30 and 39. In addition, 65.5% of them had bachelor's degree, which suggests that they were comfortable with technology. Some of the participants had less than ten years of work experience, while others had more than ten years. Statistical tests demonstrated that demographic characteristics are quite important in how medical laboratory workers think about AI.

Conclusions: Medical laboratory workers believe that the use of AI in hematology diagnostics has its benefits, but they need more training and assistance to deal with their fears and create a space where human expertise and AI technologies can work together. By taking these views into account, healthcare organizations may better educate their staff for the changing role of AI in diagnostics, which will lead to improved patient outcomes and satisfaction.

医学实验室专业人员对人工智能在推进血液学诊断中的作用的看法。
背景:人工智能(AI)在医疗保健领域发展迅速,对医学实验室诊断产生了重大影响,特别是在诊断血液疾病方面。要弄清楚在血液学诊断中使用人工智能的利弊,重要的是要了解医学实验室工作人员而不是专家对人工智能在血液学实验室诊断中的应用的看法。这项研究的目的是调查医学实验室工作人员现在对人工智能的了解,以及他们认为人工智能如何影响血液学诊断的准确性和患者的预后。方法:方法涉及113名参与者,大多数是实验室技术人员,他们填写了一份标准化问卷,作为定量探索性研究设计的一部分。数据收集阶段持续6个月,在此期间寻求时间知情同意并提供提醒以提高响应率。统计检验包括t检验和回归分析,以确定人口因素与工人对血液学诊断人工智能的意见之间的联系。结果:本研究的主要发现是工作技能和性别对“态度”的影响,研究发现大多数参与者认为他们在诊断中采用AI的专业态度可以使他们的工作更准确、更快。然而,人们对数据的质量、理解模型的难易程度以及道德含义存在一些担忧。与人工智能相关的知识、态度和实践之间存在正相关关系。次要结果显示,大多数参与者都很年轻,45.1%的参与者年龄在30至39岁之间。此外,65.5%的人拥有学士学位,这表明他们对技术感到满意。一些参与者的工作经验不足十年,而另一些则超过十年。统计测试表明,人口特征在医学实验室工作人员如何看待人工智能方面非常重要。结论:医学实验室工作人员认为,在血液学诊断中使用人工智能有其好处,但他们需要更多的培训和帮助,以消除他们的恐惧,并创造一个人类专业知识和人工智能技术可以协同工作的空间。通过考虑这些观点,医疗保健组织可以更好地教育他们的员工,让他们了解人工智能在诊断中不断变化的作用,这将改善患者的治疗结果和满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical laboratory
Clinical laboratory 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
494
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Laboratory is an international fully peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of laboratory medicine and transfusion medicine. In addition to transfusion medicine topics Clinical Laboratory represents submissions concerning tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular and gene therapies. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, posters, short reports, case studies and letters to the editor dealing with 1) the scientific background, implementation and diagnostic significance of laboratory methods employed in hospitals, blood banks and physicians'' offices and with 2) scientific, administrative and clinical aspects of transfusion medicine and 3) in addition to transfusion medicine topics Clinical Laboratory represents submissions concerning tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular and gene therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书