Are Both Quantity and Quality of Green Innovation Exalted in Polluting Firms Under Environmental Regulation?

IF 2.7 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Managerial and Decision Economics Pub Date : 2026-08-06 Epub Date: 2026-05-20 DOI:10.1002/mde.70115
Sin-Som Sergio Tsiong, Jiaqi Feng, Mingqian Zhang
{"title":"Are Both Quantity and Quality of Green Innovation Exalted in Polluting Firms Under Environmental Regulation?","authors":"Sin-Som Sergio Tsiong,&nbsp;Jiaqi Feng,&nbsp;Mingqian Zhang","doi":"10.1002/mde.70115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Green innovation plays a crucial role in the context of the low-carbon economy. Still, it is equally important to focus on gatekeeping the quality of innovation amidst the plethora of innovative outcomes. This article aims to investigate how China's carbon emission trading (CET) pilot will affect both the quantity and quality of green innovation among polluting firms. First, we construct a partial equilibrium model to describe the asymmetric effects of the CET pilot on green innovation. Then, we conduct empirical examinations based on a sample of polluted firms listed on the A-share market, using patent applications with their citation information. The results show that the CET pilot indeed stimulates the quantity of green innovation through the “leverage effect,” which is also moderated by the social responsibility firms assume. However, the green innovation quality and even the overall technological level are significantly inhibited. The results imply that there exists a certain “innovation illusion” in green innovation among polluting firms listed on the A-share market, suggesting that more effective incentive policies should be implemented to ensure both quantity and quality are improved synchronically.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18186,"journal":{"name":"Managerial and Decision Economics","volume":"47 6","pages":"1570-1587"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managerial and Decision Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mde.70115","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Green innovation plays a crucial role in the context of the low-carbon economy. Still, it is equally important to focus on gatekeeping the quality of innovation amidst the plethora of innovative outcomes. This article aims to investigate how China's carbon emission trading (CET) pilot will affect both the quantity and quality of green innovation among polluting firms. First, we construct a partial equilibrium model to describe the asymmetric effects of the CET pilot on green innovation. Then, we conduct empirical examinations based on a sample of polluted firms listed on the A-share market, using patent applications with their citation information. The results show that the CET pilot indeed stimulates the quantity of green innovation through the “leverage effect,” which is also moderated by the social responsibility firms assume. However, the green innovation quality and even the overall technological level are significantly inhibited. The results imply that there exists a certain “innovation illusion” in green innovation among polluting firms listed on the A-share market, suggesting that more effective incentive policies should be implemented to ensure both quantity and quality are improved synchronically.

环境规制下污染企业绿色创新的数量和质量是否都得到提升?
绿色创新在低碳经济背景下发挥着至关重要的作用。尽管如此,在众多创新成果中,关注创新质量的把关也同样重要。本文旨在探讨中国碳排放交易(CET)试点将如何影响污染企业绿色创新的数量和质量。首先,我们构建了一个局部均衡模型来描述CET试点对绿色创新的不对称效应。然后,我们以a股上市污染企业为样本,利用专利申请及其引文信息进行实证检验。研究结果表明,CET试点确实通过“杠杆效应”刺激了绿色创新的数量,而企业承担的社会责任也对这一效应起到了调节作用。然而,绿色创新质量甚至整体技术水平都受到显著抑制。研究结果表明,a股上市污染企业的绿色创新存在一定的“创新错觉”,应采取更有效的激励政策,确保数量和质量同步提升。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
18.20%
发文量
242
期刊介绍: Managerial and Decision Economics will publish articles applying economic reasoning to managerial decision-making and management strategy.Management strategy concerns practical decisions that managers face about how to compete, how to succeed, and how to organize to achieve their goals. Economic thinking and analysis provides a critical foundation for strategic decision-making across a variety of dimensions. For example, economic insights may help in determining which activities to outsource and which to perfom internally. They can help unravel questions regarding what drives performance differences among firms and what allows these differences to persist. They can contribute to an appreciation of how industries, organizations, and capabilities evolve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书