The synergy of pedagogical agents and metaphorical design: Reducing psychological distance to enhance video learning

IF 13 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
British Journal of Educational Technology Pub Date : 2026-08-06 Epub Date: 2026-03-26 DOI:10.1111/bjet.70064
Ke Xu, Qihui Zhang, Yi Zhang, Hongmin Xu, Zhongling Pi, Jiumin Yang
{"title":"The synergy of pedagogical agents and metaphorical design: Reducing psychological distance to enhance video learning","authors":"Ke Xu,&nbsp;Qihui Zhang,&nbsp;Yi Zhang,&nbsp;Hongmin Xu,&nbsp;Zhongling Pi,&nbsp;Jiumin Yang","doi":"10.1111/bjet.70064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>The effectiveness of video-based learning lies not in perfecting isolated elements such as pedagogical agents (PAs) or metaphorical content, but in their synergistic integration. While both have been shown to independently enhance learning outcomes, their combined potential remains underexplored. In this study, 129 learners engaged with biology content in a 2 × 2 between-subjects design to examine the effects of PAs type (real vs. virtual) and metaphorical design (no metaphor vs. metaphor) on learners' performance, attention, comprehension, psychological distance and agent evaluation and the mediating role of psychological distance. Metaphorical design used familiar concepts to make abstract biological content more relatable, whereas the no-metaphor condition presented the content in its abstract form. Results showed that both virtual pedagogical agents (VPAs) and metaphorical design improved learning performance, as they both reduced learners' attention allocation to the agent. Metaphorical design specifically increased cognitive effort, as indicated by larger pupil size, while also reducing spatial distance and enhancing VPAs' perceived human-likeness. Additionally, VPAs reduced hypothetical distance. Spatial and hypothetical distances, as well as learning comprehension, mediated the effects of the two factors on learning performance. Temporal distance mediated the interaction effect of PAs type and metaphorical design on credibility. The study concludes that both VPAs and metaphorical design enhance learning effectiveness and reduce psychological distance. Metaphorical design compensates for VPAs' lack of realism by boosting their perceived human-likeness and credibility. These findings suggest that instructional designers should prioritize not only the visual realism of VPAs but also metaphor-based content design to create more immersive, effective learning experiences.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <div>\n \n <div>\n \n <h3>Practitioner notes</h3>\n <p>What is already known about this topic\n\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>Video-based learning typically involves either real-human instructors or virtual pedagogical agents (VPAs). VPAs are increasingly used because they reduce distraction and allow scalable, consistent delivery; though they provide lower social presence.</li>\n \n <li>Research has mainly focused on agent visual design, while their pedagogical integration with instructional content has received far less attention.</li>\n \n <li>Metaphorical design supports learning in videos, yet little is known about its combined effects with agents or the mechanisms involved.</li>\n </ul>\n <p>What this paper adds\n\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>Learners taught by VPAs or with metaphorical content performed significantly better than those taught by real-human teachers or with non-metaphorical content.</li>\n \n <li>Metaphorical design improved content-focused cognitive effort, reduced perceived spatial distance and enhanced the human-likeness of VPAs, demonstrating how representational strategies shape cognition and perception.</li>\n \n <li>Spatial and hypothetical distance and comprehension mediated the effects of agent type and metaphor on performance, while temporal distance mediated their interactive effect on credibility, identifying psychological distance as a key explanatory mechanism.</li>\n </ul>\n <p>Implications for practice and/or policy\n\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>Combining metaphorical content design with VPA appearance can more effectively allocate learners' attention and enhance performance.</li>\n \n <li>Educators and designers should avoid overemphasizing agent visual realism and instead give equal weight to instructional content design, particularly metaphorical structuring.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48315,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Educational Technology","volume":"57 5","pages":"1272-1298"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.70064","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effectiveness of video-based learning lies not in perfecting isolated elements such as pedagogical agents (PAs) or metaphorical content, but in their synergistic integration. While both have been shown to independently enhance learning outcomes, their combined potential remains underexplored. In this study, 129 learners engaged with biology content in a 2 × 2 between-subjects design to examine the effects of PAs type (real vs. virtual) and metaphorical design (no metaphor vs. metaphor) on learners' performance, attention, comprehension, psychological distance and agent evaluation and the mediating role of psychological distance. Metaphorical design used familiar concepts to make abstract biological content more relatable, whereas the no-metaphor condition presented the content in its abstract form. Results showed that both virtual pedagogical agents (VPAs) and metaphorical design improved learning performance, as they both reduced learners' attention allocation to the agent. Metaphorical design specifically increased cognitive effort, as indicated by larger pupil size, while also reducing spatial distance and enhancing VPAs' perceived human-likeness. Additionally, VPAs reduced hypothetical distance. Spatial and hypothetical distances, as well as learning comprehension, mediated the effects of the two factors on learning performance. Temporal distance mediated the interaction effect of PAs type and metaphorical design on credibility. The study concludes that both VPAs and metaphorical design enhance learning effectiveness and reduce psychological distance. Metaphorical design compensates for VPAs' lack of realism by boosting their perceived human-likeness and credibility. These findings suggest that instructional designers should prioritize not only the visual realism of VPAs but also metaphor-based content design to create more immersive, effective learning experiences.

Practitioner notes

What is already known about this topic

  • Video-based learning typically involves either real-human instructors or virtual pedagogical agents (VPAs). VPAs are increasingly used because they reduce distraction and allow scalable, consistent delivery; though they provide lower social presence.
  • Research has mainly focused on agent visual design, while their pedagogical integration with instructional content has received far less attention.
  • Metaphorical design supports learning in videos, yet little is known about its combined effects with agents or the mechanisms involved.

What this paper adds

  • Learners taught by VPAs or with metaphorical content performed significantly better than those taught by real-human teachers or with non-metaphorical content.
  • Metaphorical design improved content-focused cognitive effort, reduced perceived spatial distance and enhanced the human-likeness of VPAs, demonstrating how representational strategies shape cognition and perception.
  • Spatial and hypothetical distance and comprehension mediated the effects of agent type and metaphor on performance, while temporal distance mediated their interactive effect on credibility, identifying psychological distance as a key explanatory mechanism.

Implications for practice and/or policy

  • Combining metaphorical content design with VPA appearance can more effectively allocate learners' attention and enhance performance.
  • Educators and designers should avoid overemphasizing agent visual realism and instead give equal weight to instructional content design, particularly metaphorical structuring.
教学主体与隐喻设计的协同作用:减少心理距离促进视频学习
基于视频的学习的有效性不在于完善孤立的元素,如教学代理(PAs)或隐喻内容,而在于它们的协同整合。虽然两者都被证明可以单独提高学习效果,但它们的综合潜力仍未得到充分开发。本研究以129名学习者为研究对象,采用2 × 2被试设计,考察情景类型(真实与虚拟)和隐喻设计(无隐喻与隐喻)对学习者学习成绩、注意力、理解、心理距离和主体评价的影响,以及心理距离的中介作用。隐喻设计使用熟悉的概念使抽象的生物内容更具关联性,而无隐喻条件则以抽象的形式呈现内容。结果表明,虚拟教学代理(vpa)和隐喻设计都能提高学习成绩,因为它们都减少了学习者对代理的注意分配。隐喻设计特别增加了认知努力,如更大的瞳孔大小所表明的那样,同时也减少了空间距离,增强了vpa感知的人类相似性。此外,vpa减少了假设距离。空间距离和假设距离以及学习理解在两个因素对学习成绩的影响中起中介作用。时间距离在言语类型和隐喻设计对可信度的交互作用中起中介作用。研究结果表明,隐喻设计和VPAs均能提高学习者的学习效果,减小心理距离。隐喻设计弥补了vpa缺乏真实感的不足,提高了它们在人们心目中与人类的相似性和可信度。这些发现表明,教学设计师不仅应该优先考虑vpa的视觉真实感,还应该考虑基于隐喻的内容设计,以创造更身临其境、更有效的学习体验。基于视频的学习通常涉及真人讲师或虚拟教学代理(vpa)。vpa越来越多地被使用,因为它们减少了干扰,并允许可扩展的、一致的交付;尽管它们提供的社会存在感较低。研究主要集中在智能体视觉设计上,而它们与教学内容的教学整合却很少受到关注。隐喻设计支持视频中的学习,但对其与代理或相关机制的综合影响知之甚少。使用虚拟替身教师或使用隐喻性内容教学的学生表现明显优于真人教师或使用非隐喻性内容教学的学生。隐喻设计提高了以内容为中心的认知努力,减少了感知的空间距离,增强了VPAs的人类相似性,表明表征策略如何影响认知和感知。空间距离、假设距离和理解在行为主体类型和隐喻对行为表现的影响中起中介作用,时间距离在行为主体类型和隐喻对行为表现的影响中起中介作用,心理距离在行为主体类型和隐喻对行为表现的影响中起中介作用。将隐喻性内容设计与VPA外观相结合,可以更有效地分配学习者的注意力,提高学习成绩。教育工作者和设计师应避免过分强调代理的视觉现实性,而应同等重视教学内容设计,特别是隐喻结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Educational Technology
British Journal of Educational Technology EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: BJET is a primary source for academics and professionals in the fields of digital educational and training technology throughout the world. The Journal is published by Wiley on behalf of The British Educational Research Association (BERA). It publishes theoretical perspectives, methodological developments and high quality empirical research that demonstrate whether and how applications of instructional/educational technology systems, networks, tools and resources lead to improvements in formal and non-formal education at all levels, from early years through to higher, technical and vocational education, professional development and corporate training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书