Thermodynamic and Property-Driven Evaluation of Low-GWP Refrigerants as Alternatives to R-134a in VCR Systems

IF 2.7 Q2 THERMODYNAMICS
Heat Transfer Pub Date : 2026-08-05 Epub Date: 2026-05-11 DOI:10.1002/htj.70274
Abhishek Kumar, Shou-Yin Yang, Chi-Chuan Wang
{"title":"Thermodynamic and Property-Driven Evaluation of Low-GWP Refrigerants as Alternatives to R-134a in VCR Systems","authors":"Abhishek Kumar,&nbsp;Shou-Yin Yang,&nbsp;Chi-Chuan Wang","doi":"10.1002/htj.70274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The global phase-out of high-global warming potential (high-GWP) refrigerants has intensified the search for environmentally benign and energy-efficient alternatives to R-134a in vapor compression refrigeration systems (VCRS). This study presents a comprehensive thermodynamic evaluation of low-GWP refrigerants, including R-152a, R-515B, R-1234ze(E), R-1234yf, R-290, R-600a, R-600, and R-1270, as potential replacements for R-134a. A steady-state thermodynamic cycle model was developed, incorporating fixed superheating and subcooling levels, with simulations conducted for evaporator temperatures between −10°C and 15°C and condenser temperatures between 10°C and 50°C. Key performance indicators such as coefficient of performance (COP), compressor power consumption, and refrigerant mass-flow rate were calculated and normalized relative to R-134a. The results show that hydrocarbon refrigerants (R-600a and R-600) achieve up to 3%–4% higher COP than R-134a, while R-152a provides approximately 3%–4% COP improvement with reduced compressor power (~ 4%). In contrast, R-1234yf exhibits 4%–5% lower COP and 2%–5% higher compressor power, whereas R-290 and R-1270 show moderate efficiency penalties of 1%–3%. R-515B and R-1234ze(E) demonstrate near-baseline performance, with COP variations within ±1% of R-134a. Mass-flow rate reductions of 40%–50% are observed for hydrocarbons and R-152a due to higher latent heat, while R-1234yf requires 25%–28% higher flow rate. The results further reveal that performance trends are strongly governed by latent heat, thermal conductivity, viscosity, and reduced pressure. Overall, low-GWP refrigerants can deliver comparable or superior thermodynamic performance to R-134a, though trade-offs between efficiency, compressor loading, and volumetric capacity must be considered. These findings provide practical guidance for selecting sustainable refrigerants that balance environmental impact and operational efficiency in future cooling system design.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":44939,"journal":{"name":"Heat Transfer","volume":"55 6","pages":"3592-3605"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heat Transfer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/htj.70274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"THERMODYNAMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global phase-out of high-global warming potential (high-GWP) refrigerants has intensified the search for environmentally benign and energy-efficient alternatives to R-134a in vapor compression refrigeration systems (VCRS). This study presents a comprehensive thermodynamic evaluation of low-GWP refrigerants, including R-152a, R-515B, R-1234ze(E), R-1234yf, R-290, R-600a, R-600, and R-1270, as potential replacements for R-134a. A steady-state thermodynamic cycle model was developed, incorporating fixed superheating and subcooling levels, with simulations conducted for evaporator temperatures between −10°C and 15°C and condenser temperatures between 10°C and 50°C. Key performance indicators such as coefficient of performance (COP), compressor power consumption, and refrigerant mass-flow rate were calculated and normalized relative to R-134a. The results show that hydrocarbon refrigerants (R-600a and R-600) achieve up to 3%–4% higher COP than R-134a, while R-152a provides approximately 3%–4% COP improvement with reduced compressor power (~ 4%). In contrast, R-1234yf exhibits 4%–5% lower COP and 2%–5% higher compressor power, whereas R-290 and R-1270 show moderate efficiency penalties of 1%–3%. R-515B and R-1234ze(E) demonstrate near-baseline performance, with COP variations within ±1% of R-134a. Mass-flow rate reductions of 40%–50% are observed for hydrocarbons and R-152a due to higher latent heat, while R-1234yf requires 25%–28% higher flow rate. The results further reveal that performance trends are strongly governed by latent heat, thermal conductivity, viscosity, and reduced pressure. Overall, low-GWP refrigerants can deliver comparable or superior thermodynamic performance to R-134a, though trade-offs between efficiency, compressor loading, and volumetric capacity must be considered. These findings provide practical guidance for selecting sustainable refrigerants that balance environmental impact and operational efficiency in future cooling system design.

作为VCR系统中R-134a替代品的低gwp制冷剂的热力学和性能驱动评估
全球逐步淘汰高全球变暖潜能值(高gwp)制冷剂,加强了对蒸汽压缩制冷系统(VCRS)中R-134a的环保和节能替代品的研究。本研究对低gwp制冷剂进行了全面的热力学评估,包括R-152a、R-515B、R-1234ze(E)、R-1234yf、R-290、R-600a、R-600和R-1270,作为R-134a的潜在替代品。建立了一个包含固定过热和过冷水平的稳态热力学循环模型,并对蒸发器温度在- 10°C至15°C之间,冷凝器温度在10°C至50°C之间进行了模拟。计算性能系数(COP)、压缩机功耗、制冷剂质量流量等关键性能指标,并相对于R-134a进行归一化。结果表明,烃类制冷剂(R-600a和R-600)的COP比R-134a高3% ~ 4%,而R-152a在压缩机功率降低(~ 4%)的情况下,COP提高了约3% ~ 4%。相比之下,R-1234yf的COP降低了4%-5%,压缩机功率提高了2%-5%,而R-290和R-1270的效率降低了1%-3%。R-515B和R-1234ze(E)表现出接近基线的性能,COP变化在R-134a的±1%以内。由于潜热较高,碳氢化合物和R-152a的质量流速率降低了40%-50%,而R-1234yf的质量流速率需要提高25%-28%。结果进一步表明,性能趋势受潜热、导热系数、粘度和减压的强烈影响。总体而言,低gwp制冷剂可以提供与R-134a相当或更好的热力学性能,但必须考虑效率,压缩机负载和容积容量之间的权衡。这些发现为在未来的冷却系统设计中选择平衡环境影响和运行效率的可持续制冷剂提供了实用指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heat Transfer
Heat Transfer THERMODYNAMICS-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
19.40%
发文量
342
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书