A Practical Guide to Studying Magnetic Alignment of Free-Living Animals: Lessons From Leopards

IF 1.3 4区 生物学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Ethology Pub Date : 2026-08-05 Epub Date: 2026-07-07 DOI:10.1111/eth.70094
Lukas Landler, Michael S. Painter, Graeme D. Ruxton
{"title":"A Practical Guide to Studying Magnetic Alignment of Free-Living Animals: Lessons From Leopards","authors":"Lukas Landler,&nbsp;Michael S. Painter,&nbsp;Graeme D. Ruxton","doi":"10.1111/eth.70094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Spontaneous magnetic alignment describes the tendency of animals to preferentially orient their major body axis in a non-random alignment relative to the magnetic field. Several well-controlled laboratory studies have reported this behavior, yet the majority of studies come from field observations in natural contexts. However, behavioral field data are intrinsically complex due to many potential factors influencing animal spatial behavior. Here, we use a published data set on leopard alignment, Yosef et al. (2022), to showcase potential pitfalls in studies of magnetic alignment, and offer guidance on avoiding such pitfalls. We provide an approach to test for spatial autocorrelation (with scripts available in R) which was validated in a small simulation study and offer a roadmap for magnetic alignment investigations. Our example demonstrates that spatial autocorrelation can be a complicating issue when analyzing field data, potentially leading to reduced power to detect real effects or overinterpretation of apparent evidence of alignment. Developing specific techniques to overcome spatial autocorrelation, without losing statistical power, will be an important challenge for future methodological development in circular statistics. Our paper will help researchers to more robustly evaluate evidence for field studies on magnetic orientation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50494,"journal":{"name":"Ethology","volume":"132 9","pages":"642-650"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eth.70094","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eth.70094","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spontaneous magnetic alignment describes the tendency of animals to preferentially orient their major body axis in a non-random alignment relative to the magnetic field. Several well-controlled laboratory studies have reported this behavior, yet the majority of studies come from field observations in natural contexts. However, behavioral field data are intrinsically complex due to many potential factors influencing animal spatial behavior. Here, we use a published data set on leopard alignment, Yosef et al. (2022), to showcase potential pitfalls in studies of magnetic alignment, and offer guidance on avoiding such pitfalls. We provide an approach to test for spatial autocorrelation (with scripts available in R) which was validated in a small simulation study and offer a roadmap for magnetic alignment investigations. Our example demonstrates that spatial autocorrelation can be a complicating issue when analyzing field data, potentially leading to reduced power to detect real effects or overinterpretation of apparent evidence of alignment. Developing specific techniques to overcome spatial autocorrelation, without losing statistical power, will be an important challenge for future methodological development in circular statistics. Our paper will help researchers to more robustly evaluate evidence for field studies on magnetic orientation.

研究自由生活动物的磁场排列的实用指南:从豹子的教训
自发磁定向描述了动物倾向于优先定向它们的主要身体轴相对于磁场的非随机排列。一些控制良好的实验室研究报告了这种行为,但大多数研究来自自然环境下的实地观察。然而,由于影响动物空间行为的潜在因素很多,行为场数据本质上是复杂的。在这里,我们使用Yosef et al.(2022)发表的豹子对齐数据集来展示磁对齐研究中的潜在缺陷,并提供避免这些缺陷的指导。我们提供了一种测试空间自相关的方法(使用R中可用的脚本),该方法在小型模拟研究中得到了验证,并为磁对准研究提供了路线图。我们的例子表明,在分析现场数据时,空间自相关可能是一个复杂的问题,可能导致检测实际效果的能力降低,或者对明显对准证据的过度解释。开发特定的技术来克服空间自相关,而不失去统计能力,将是未来循环统计方法发展的重要挑战。我们的论文将帮助研究人员更有力地评估磁场取向的实地研究证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ethology
Ethology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
89
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International in scope, Ethology publishes original research on behaviour including physiological mechanisms, function, and evolution. The Journal addresses behaviour in all species, from slime moulds to humans. Experimental research is preferred, both from the field and the lab, which is grounded in a theoretical framework. The section ''Perspectives and Current Debates'' provides an overview of the field and may include theoretical investigations and essays on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书