Beyond MOOCs: How technical and structural factors shape learner engagement, retention and inclusivity across online learning platforms

IF 13 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
British Journal of Educational Technology Pub Date : 2026-08-06 Epub Date: 2026-05-07 DOI:10.1111/bjet.70066
Rotimi Ogunsakin, Deborah Okonu, Paschal Nwokeocha
{"title":"Beyond MOOCs: How technical and structural factors shape learner engagement, retention and inclusivity across online learning platforms","authors":"Rotimi Ogunsakin,&nbsp;Deborah Okonu,&nbsp;Paschal Nwokeocha","doi":"10.1111/bjet.70066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study examines the critical influence of technical and structural factors—such as interface design, technical performance, payment barriers, certification access, pricing models and accessibility constraints—on learner Engagement, Retention and Inclusivity (ERI) in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) and other large-scale online learning platforms. Employing a novel mixed-methods analytical method termed 2TS (Topic Modelling, Sentiment Classification, Systematic Keyword Selection and Thematic Analysis), we analysed over 226,000 user reviews from six globally recognised online learning platforms, including traditional MOOC providers and other large-scale digital learning systems: Coursera, edX, Udemy, Alison, uLesson and Khan Academy. Our findings suggest that technical instability, limited offline functionalities and unclear pricing structures have a negative impact on learner engagement and retention. Furthermore, regional payment restrictions and ambiguous subscription terms disproportionately disadvantage learners in low-resource settings, significantly undermining the inclusivity of online learning platforms. The research highlights how carefully structured platform design and robust technical infrastructure have a significant influence on digital learning outcomes. Practical implications underscore the need for platform providers to enhance platform usability, promote transparent pricing and adopt inclusive technological solutions, particularly to ensure equitable access and engagement among diverse global audiences.</p><p>\n \n </p>","PeriodicalId":48315,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Educational Technology","volume":"57 5","pages":"1348-1373"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.70066","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the critical influence of technical and structural factors—such as interface design, technical performance, payment barriers, certification access, pricing models and accessibility constraints—on learner Engagement, Retention and Inclusivity (ERI) in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) and other large-scale online learning platforms. Employing a novel mixed-methods analytical method termed 2TS (Topic Modelling, Sentiment Classification, Systematic Keyword Selection and Thematic Analysis), we analysed over 226,000 user reviews from six globally recognised online learning platforms, including traditional MOOC providers and other large-scale digital learning systems: Coursera, edX, Udemy, Alison, uLesson and Khan Academy. Our findings suggest that technical instability, limited offline functionalities and unclear pricing structures have a negative impact on learner engagement and retention. Furthermore, regional payment restrictions and ambiguous subscription terms disproportionately disadvantage learners in low-resource settings, significantly undermining the inclusivity of online learning platforms. The research highlights how carefully structured platform design and robust technical infrastructure have a significant influence on digital learning outcomes. Practical implications underscore the need for platform providers to enhance platform usability, promote transparent pricing and adopt inclusive technological solutions, particularly to ensure equitable access and engagement among diverse global audiences.

超越mooc:技术和结构因素如何影响在线学习平台上学习者的参与度、留存率和包容性
本研究考察了技术和结构因素(如界面设计、技术性能、支付障碍、认证获取、定价模型和可访问性限制)对大规模在线开放课程(MOOCs)和其他大型在线学习平台中学习者参与度、保留率和包容性(ERI)的关键影响。采用一种名为2TS(主题建模、情感分类、系统关键词选择和主题分析)的新型混合方法分析方法,我们分析了来自六个全球公认的在线学习平台的226,000多条用户评论,包括传统的MOOC提供商和其他大型数字学习系统:Coursera、edX、Udemy、Alison、uLesson和可汗学院。我们的研究结果表明,技术不稳定、有限的离线功能和不明确的定价结构对学习者的参与和保留有负面影响。此外,区域支付限制和模糊的订阅条款对资源匮乏地区的学习者造成了不成比例的不利影响,严重破坏了在线学习平台的包容性。该研究强调了精心构建的平台设计和强大的技术基础设施如何对数字学习成果产生重大影响。实际影响突出表明,平台提供商需要提高平台可用性,促进透明定价,采用包容性技术解决方案,特别是确保全球不同受众的公平获取和参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Educational Technology
British Journal of Educational Technology EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: BJET is a primary source for academics and professionals in the fields of digital educational and training technology throughout the world. The Journal is published by Wiley on behalf of The British Educational Research Association (BERA). It publishes theoretical perspectives, methodological developments and high quality empirical research that demonstrate whether and how applications of instructional/educational technology systems, networks, tools and resources lead to improvements in formal and non-formal education at all levels, from early years through to higher, technical and vocational education, professional development and corporate training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书