Is reliable climate change information ‘predictably uncertain’?

IF 1.5 1区 哲学 Q1 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Matthias Ackermann
{"title":"Is reliable climate change information ‘predictably uncertain’?","authors":"Matthias Ackermann","doi":"10.1007/s13194-026-00757-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent discussion suggests that uncertainty in climate models’ representation of the interaction between external radiative forcing and internal variability prevents scientists from reliably providing local (or regional) climate change information anytime soon. In this paper, I articulate ‘predictable uncertainty’ as an epistemic criterion of reliable climate change information: the ability of climate scientists to systematically characterize and constrain the uncertainty envelope associated with their epistemic situation. There are two related implications. First, internal variability can be an informative signal for future climate change, and controlling for it can help identify the scales at which climate model-based or climate model-supported information may be reliable. Second, the reliability of local climate change information should be evaluated based not primarily on the amount of uncertainty in the interaction between the forced response and internal variability, but rather on climate scientists’ ability to characterize and constrain that uncertainty.","PeriodicalId":48832,"journal":{"name":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-026-00757-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent discussion suggests that uncertainty in climate models’ representation of the interaction between external radiative forcing and internal variability prevents scientists from reliably providing local (or regional) climate change information anytime soon. In this paper, I articulate ‘predictable uncertainty’ as an epistemic criterion of reliable climate change information: the ability of climate scientists to systematically characterize and constrain the uncertainty envelope associated with their epistemic situation. There are two related implications. First, internal variability can be an informative signal for future climate change, and controlling for it can help identify the scales at which climate model-based or climate model-supported information may be reliable. Second, the reliability of local climate change information should be evaluated based not primarily on the amount of uncertainty in the interaction between the forced response and internal variability, but rather on climate scientists’ ability to characterize and constrain that uncertainty.
可靠的气候变化信息是“可预测的不确定性”吗?
最近的讨论表明,气候模式对外部辐射强迫与内部变率之间相互作用的表述存在不确定性,这阻碍了科学家在短期内可靠地提供局部(或区域)气候变化信息。在本文中,我阐明了“可预测的不确定性”作为可靠气候变化信息的认知标准:气候科学家系统地表征和约束与其认知情况相关的不确定性包络的能力。有两个相关的含义。首先,内部变率可以是未来气候变化的信息信号,控制它可以帮助确定基于气候模式或气候模式支持的信息可能可靠的尺度。其次,评估当地气候变化信息的可靠性时,不应主要基于强迫响应与内部变率之间相互作用的不确定性程度,而应基于气候科学家描述和约束这种不确定性的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal for Philosophy of Science
European Journal for Philosophy of Science HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
13.30%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: The European Journal for Philosophy of Science publishes groundbreaking works that can deepen understanding of the concepts and methods of the sciences, as they explore increasingly many facets of the world we live in. It is of direct interest to philosophers of science coming from different perspectives, as well as scientists, citizens and policymakers. The journal is interested in articles from all traditions and all backgrounds, as long as they engage with the sciences in a constructive, and critical, way. The journal represents the various longstanding European philosophical traditions engaging with the sciences, but welcomes articles from every part of the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书