{"title":"Is reliable climate change information ‘predictably uncertain’?","authors":"Matthias Ackermann","doi":"10.1007/s13194-026-00757-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent discussion suggests that uncertainty in climate models’ representation of the interaction between external radiative forcing and internal variability prevents scientists from reliably providing local (or regional) climate change information anytime soon. In this paper, I articulate ‘predictable uncertainty’ as an epistemic criterion of reliable climate change information: the ability of climate scientists to systematically characterize and constrain the uncertainty envelope associated with their epistemic situation. There are two related implications. First, internal variability can be an informative signal for future climate change, and controlling for it can help identify the scales at which climate model-based or climate model-supported information may be reliable. Second, the reliability of local climate change information should be evaluated based not primarily on the amount of uncertainty in the interaction between the forced response and internal variability, but rather on climate scientists’ ability to characterize and constrain that uncertainty.","PeriodicalId":48832,"journal":{"name":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-026-00757-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Recent discussion suggests that uncertainty in climate models’ representation of the interaction between external radiative forcing and internal variability prevents scientists from reliably providing local (or regional) climate change information anytime soon. In this paper, I articulate ‘predictable uncertainty’ as an epistemic criterion of reliable climate change information: the ability of climate scientists to systematically characterize and constrain the uncertainty envelope associated with their epistemic situation. There are two related implications. First, internal variability can be an informative signal for future climate change, and controlling for it can help identify the scales at which climate model-based or climate model-supported information may be reliable. Second, the reliability of local climate change information should be evaluated based not primarily on the amount of uncertainty in the interaction between the forced response and internal variability, but rather on climate scientists’ ability to characterize and constrain that uncertainty.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal for Philosophy of Science publishes groundbreaking works that can deepen understanding of the concepts and methods of the sciences, as they explore increasingly many facets of the world we live in. It is of direct interest to philosophers of science coming from different perspectives, as well as scientists, citizens and policymakers. The journal is interested in articles from all traditions and all backgrounds, as long as they engage with the sciences in a constructive, and critical, way. The journal represents the various longstanding European philosophical traditions engaging with the sciences, but welcomes articles from every part of the world.