Fostering computational thinking through robotics in kindergarten: A systematic review of learning strategies, frameworks, and assessment

IF 10.3 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Educational Research Review Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-03 DOI:10.1016/j.edurev.2026.100829
Soultana Tsingidou, Theodosios Sapounidis
{"title":"Fostering computational thinking through robotics in kindergarten: A systematic review of learning strategies, frameworks, and assessment","authors":"Soultana Tsingidou,&nbsp;Theodosios Sapounidis","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2026.100829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Computational Thinking (CT) is considered a core 21st-century skill that should be developed early. Educational robotics has been introduced to kindergarten settings to foster the CT learning process. However, there is no systematic review documenting the learning strategies and CT frameworks employed for CT development in kindergarten through robotics. Similarly, there is no updated presentation of the examined CT skills at this level. Furthermore, there is no up-to-date systematic record and classification of the CT assessment tools used to measure CT skills specifically in the kindergarten context. The existing reviews of CT assessment examine broad educational settings ranging from kindergarten through higher education, and do not focus exclusively on educational robotics. Therefore, this systematic review analyses 53 out of 2306 studies published from 2015 to March 2026 across 7 databases, examining robot-mediated CT development in kindergarten. It explored the learning strategies, CT frameworks, CT skills, and assessment tools employed. Our findings indicate that problem-based learning, storytelling, and scaffolding are the most frequently employed strategies in robot-mediated CT learning. In the reviewed articles, four CT frameworks were identified, although most of the studies did not specify any framework. CT concepts and practices are most frequently examined, while CT perspectives remain underexplored. Total CT, sequencing, debugging, and algorithmic design are the most assessed CT skills. Regarding CT assessment tools, TechCheck-K is the most widely used, although in many cases, the assessment tools are developed ad hoc and lack formal validation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"52 ","pages":"Article 100829"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X26000680","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Computational Thinking (CT) is considered a core 21st-century skill that should be developed early. Educational robotics has been introduced to kindergarten settings to foster the CT learning process. However, there is no systematic review documenting the learning strategies and CT frameworks employed for CT development in kindergarten through robotics. Similarly, there is no updated presentation of the examined CT skills at this level. Furthermore, there is no up-to-date systematic record and classification of the CT assessment tools used to measure CT skills specifically in the kindergarten context. The existing reviews of CT assessment examine broad educational settings ranging from kindergarten through higher education, and do not focus exclusively on educational robotics. Therefore, this systematic review analyses 53 out of 2306 studies published from 2015 to March 2026 across 7 databases, examining robot-mediated CT development in kindergarten. It explored the learning strategies, CT frameworks, CT skills, and assessment tools employed. Our findings indicate that problem-based learning, storytelling, and scaffolding are the most frequently employed strategies in robot-mediated CT learning. In the reviewed articles, four CT frameworks were identified, although most of the studies did not specify any framework. CT concepts and practices are most frequently examined, while CT perspectives remain underexplored. Total CT, sequencing, debugging, and algorithmic design are the most assessed CT skills. Regarding CT assessment tools, TechCheck-K is the most widely used, although in many cases, the assessment tools are developed ad hoc and lack formal validation.
通过幼儿园机器人培养计算思维:学习策略、框架和评估的系统回顾
计算思维(CT)被认为是21世纪的核心技能,应该及早培养。教育机器人已被引入幼儿园环境,以促进CT学习过程。然而,目前还没有系统的综述记录了通过机器人技术在幼儿园发展CT所采用的学习策略和CT框架。同样,在这一级别没有更新的CT检查技能的展示。此外,没有最新的系统记录和分类的CT评估工具,用于测量CT技能,特别是在幼儿园的背景下。现有的CT评估审查了从幼儿园到高等教育的广泛教育环境,并没有专门关注教育机器人。因此,本系统综述分析了2015年至2026年3月在7个数据库中发表的2306项研究中的53项,研究了机器人介导的幼儿园CT发展。它探讨了学习策略、CT框架、CT技能和使用的评估工具。我们的研究结果表明,基于问题的学习、讲故事和搭建是机器人介导的CT学习中最常用的策略。在回顾的文章中,确定了四种CT框架,尽管大多数研究没有指定任何框架。CT的概念和实践是最常被检查的,而CT的观点仍然没有得到充分的探索。全CT、排序、调试和算法设计是最受评估的CT技能。在CT评估工具方面,TechCheck-K是使用最广泛的,尽管在许多情况下,评估工具是临时开发的,缺乏正式的验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educational Research Review
Educational Research Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
19.40
自引率
0.90%
发文量
53
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Educational Research Review is an international journal catering to researchers and diverse agencies keen on reviewing studies and theoretical papers in education at any level. The journal welcomes high-quality articles that address educational research problems through a review approach, encompassing thematic or methodological reviews and meta-analyses. With an inclusive scope, the journal does not limit itself to any specific age range and invites articles across various settings where learning and education take place, such as schools, corporate training, and both formal and informal educational environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书