{"title":"Numerical Investigation of Natural Gas Pipeline Physical Explosions with a Compressibility-Factor-Based Non-Ideal Initial State Correction","authors":"Wenwen Li, Yuguang Cao, Ying Zhen, Qiqi Deng, Hongtu Lu, Zikang Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2026.109381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Long-distance high-pressure natural gas pipelines underpin low-carbon energy supply, and rupture of an in-service segment radiates an overpressure wave whose impact radius governs safety-distance determination. Current assessment relies on the TNT-equivalence method, whose point-source geometry, instantaneous energy deposition, and ideal-gas treatment contradict the cylindrical source, finite-rate efflux, and non-ideal initial state of an actual rupture, leaving safety distances systematically biased. An Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) fluid-structure interaction model coupling crack propagation with gas release is constructed in LS-DYNA, in which the initial gas state is corrected using the compressibility factor <ce:italic>Z</ce:italic>, representing a non-ideal initial-state correction rather than a fully real-gas equation of state. Benchmarked against the P4 full-scale X90 burst, the ALE framework reproduces the measured peak overpressure within 4.6% at 10<ce:hsp sp=\"0.25\"></ce:hsp>m and 29.0% at 50<ce:hsp sp=\"0.25\"></ce:hsp>m, whereas the TNT simulation overshoots the 10<ce:hsp sp=\"0.25\"></ce:hsp>m peak by 24.5% and underpredicts the 50<ce:hsp sp=\"0.25\"></ce:hsp>m peak by 69.4%. The Z-correction alone contributes a 9.7% peak uplift at 10<ce:hsp sp=\"0.25\"></ce:hsp>m, providing a physically consistent basis for refining pipeline safety-distance provisions.","PeriodicalId":20743,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","volume":"78 1","pages":"109381"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2026.109381","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Long-distance high-pressure natural gas pipelines underpin low-carbon energy supply, and rupture of an in-service segment radiates an overpressure wave whose impact radius governs safety-distance determination. Current assessment relies on the TNT-equivalence method, whose point-source geometry, instantaneous energy deposition, and ideal-gas treatment contradict the cylindrical source, finite-rate efflux, and non-ideal initial state of an actual rupture, leaving safety distances systematically biased. An Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) fluid-structure interaction model coupling crack propagation with gas release is constructed in LS-DYNA, in which the initial gas state is corrected using the compressibility factor Z, representing a non-ideal initial-state correction rather than a fully real-gas equation of state. Benchmarked against the P4 full-scale X90 burst, the ALE framework reproduces the measured peak overpressure within 4.6% at 10m and 29.0% at 50m, whereas the TNT simulation overshoots the 10m peak by 24.5% and underpredicts the 50m peak by 69.4%. The Z-correction alone contributes a 9.7% peak uplift at 10m, providing a physically consistent basis for refining pipeline safety-distance provisions.
期刊介绍:
The Process Safety and Environmental Protection (PSEP) journal is a leading international publication that focuses on the publication of high-quality, original research papers in the field of engineering, specifically those related to the safety of industrial processes and environmental protection. The journal encourages submissions that present new developments in safety and environmental aspects, particularly those that show how research findings can be applied in process engineering design and practice.
PSEP is particularly interested in research that brings fresh perspectives to established engineering principles, identifies unsolved problems, or suggests directions for future research. The journal also values contributions that push the boundaries of traditional engineering and welcomes multidisciplinary papers.
PSEP's articles are abstracted and indexed by a range of databases and services, which helps to ensure that the journal's research is accessible and recognized in the academic and professional communities. These databases include ANTE, Chemical Abstracts, Chemical Hazards in Industry, Current Contents, Elsevier Engineering Information database, Pascal Francis, Web of Science, Scopus, Engineering Information Database EnCompass LIT (Elsevier), and INSPEC. This wide coverage facilitates the dissemination of the journal's content to a global audience interested in process safety and environmental engineering.