Targeting Sensitivity and Selectivity in Data-Driven Mineral Prospectivity Mapping in Response to Mineral System-Based Geodata Annotation: Experimental Studies Using Pan-Canadian Copper Annotation and Philosophical Implications

IF 6 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Steven E. Zhang, Mohammad Parsa, Laura-Jane Eagleson, Christopher J. M. Lawley, Dianne Mitchinson, Renato Cumani
{"title":"Targeting Sensitivity and Selectivity in Data-Driven Mineral Prospectivity Mapping in Response to Mineral System-Based Geodata Annotation: Experimental Studies Using Pan-Canadian Copper Annotation and Philosophical Implications","authors":"Steven E. Zhang, Mohammad Parsa, Laura-Jane Eagleson, Christopher J. M. Lawley, Dianne Mitchinson, Renato Cumani","doi":"10.1007/s11053-026-10691-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The nature of targets extracted through data-driven mineral prospectivity mapping (DD-MPM) is dependent on geodata annotation. However, geodata annotation is noisy because mineral systems are complex systems and the definition of positivity changes with annotator, jurisdiction and time. Consequently, historically annotated data (HAD), which are the exhaustive collection of labeled samples (sites) that have accumulated over the history of exploration, is a noisy and subjective source of ground truth. However, the spatial sensitivity and selectivity of DD-MPM products to annotation is quantitatively unknown. Although HAD are always used at large scales of MPM, the cost-to-benefit analysis of improving and augmenting them is unclear because of inherent limitations of DD-MPM, including: (1) scientific confounds that ironically bias targeting toward the known as opposed to truly greenfield; (2) research design challenges that create circular logic during validation; and (3) geoscience and implementation uncertainty that make DD-MPM products heuristic. We conducted two experiments to: (1) verify the distribution of noisy positive samples in HAD and test whether a minority of samples carry a majority of information; and (2) assess the effectiveness of mineral system constraints by annotating maximally separable mineral systems of a commodity and relating their target overlap with class separability. Using a HAD database containing all copper samples in Canada, we observed that: (1) about 14% of the cleanest samples in HAD generated 71% of all spatial targets; and (2) fully separable mineral systems generated spatially overlapping targets, which is a hypothesis-generating finding. Together, these results (a) provide scientific evidence for annotation noise, its characteristics and impact; and (b) highlight the value of HAD and the need for more rigorous frameworks of mineral system-based DD-MPM.","PeriodicalId":54284,"journal":{"name":"Natural Resources Research","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Resources Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-026-10691-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The nature of targets extracted through data-driven mineral prospectivity mapping (DD-MPM) is dependent on geodata annotation. However, geodata annotation is noisy because mineral systems are complex systems and the definition of positivity changes with annotator, jurisdiction and time. Consequently, historically annotated data (HAD), which are the exhaustive collection of labeled samples (sites) that have accumulated over the history of exploration, is a noisy and subjective source of ground truth. However, the spatial sensitivity and selectivity of DD-MPM products to annotation is quantitatively unknown. Although HAD are always used at large scales of MPM, the cost-to-benefit analysis of improving and augmenting them is unclear because of inherent limitations of DD-MPM, including: (1) scientific confounds that ironically bias targeting toward the known as opposed to truly greenfield; (2) research design challenges that create circular logic during validation; and (3) geoscience and implementation uncertainty that make DD-MPM products heuristic. We conducted two experiments to: (1) verify the distribution of noisy positive samples in HAD and test whether a minority of samples carry a majority of information; and (2) assess the effectiveness of mineral system constraints by annotating maximally separable mineral systems of a commodity and relating their target overlap with class separability. Using a HAD database containing all copper samples in Canada, we observed that: (1) about 14% of the cleanest samples in HAD generated 71% of all spatial targets; and (2) fully separable mineral systems generated spatially overlapping targets, which is a hypothesis-generating finding. Together, these results (a) provide scientific evidence for annotation noise, its characteristics and impact; and (b) highlight the value of HAD and the need for more rigorous frameworks of mineral system-based DD-MPM.
基于矿物系统的地质数据注释在数据驱动的矿物找矿性制图中的敏感性和选择性:使用泛加拿大铜注释的实验研究及其哲学意义
通过数据驱动的矿产远景图(DD-MPM)提取的目标的性质依赖于地理数据标注。然而,由于矿物系统是复杂的系统,且正性的定义随标注者、管辖权和时间的变化而变化,因此地质数据标注存在噪声。因此,历史注释数据(HAD)是在勘探历史中积累的标记样本(地点)的详尽收集,是一个嘈杂和主观的地面真相来源。然而,DD-MPM产品对注释的空间敏感性和选择性在数量上是未知的。尽管HAD总是在大规模的MPM中使用,但由于DD-MPM的固有局限性,改进和扩大它们的成本效益分析尚不清楚,包括:(1)具有讽刺意味的偏向于已知目标而不是真正的绿地的科学混淆;(2)研究在验证过程中产生循环逻辑的设计挑战;(3)地球科学和实施的不确定性使得DD-MPM产品具有启发式。我们进行了两个实验:(1)验证有噪声的阳性样本在HAD中的分布,检验少数样本是否携带了大部分信息;(2)通过注释商品的最大可分离矿物系统并将其目标重叠与类可分离性联系起来,评估矿物系统约束的有效性。利用包含加拿大所有铜样品的HAD数据库,我们观察到:(1)HAD中最干净的样品中约14%产生了所有空间目标的71%;(2)完全可分离的矿物系统产生空间重叠目标,这是一个假设生成的发现。总之,这些结果(a)为注释噪声及其特征和影响提供了科学依据;(b)强调可持续发展评估的价值和需要更严格的以矿物系统为基础的可持续发展-资源管理框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Natural Resources Research
Natural Resources Research Environmental Science-General Environmental Science
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: This journal publishes quantitative studies of natural (mainly but not limited to mineral) resources exploration, evaluation and exploitation, including environmental and risk-related aspects. Typical articles use geoscientific data or analyses to assess, test, or compare resource-related aspects. NRR covers a wide variety of resources including minerals, coal, hydrocarbon, geothermal, water, and vegetation. Case studies are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书