Prognostic Value of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Patients Admitted With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: A Prospective Observational Study From a Tertiary Referral Centre.

International journal of heart failure Pub Date : 2026-07-27 eCollection Date: 2026-07-01 DOI:10.36628/ijhf.2025.0090
Tanmay Boob, Pooja Vyas, Kewal Kanabar, Krutika Patel, Ravina Modi, Mohit Khare, Iva Patel
{"title":"Prognostic Value of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Patients Admitted With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: A Prospective Observational Study From a Tertiary Referral Centre.","authors":"Tanmay Boob, Pooja Vyas, Kewal Kanabar, Krutika Patel, Ravina Modi, Mohit Khare, Iva Patel","doi":"10.36628/ijhf.2025.0090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Heart failure (HF) remains a major cause of morbidity and frequent readmissions in India. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) offers dynamic evaluation of blood pressure (BP) patterns, BP variability and morning blood pressure surge (MBPS) which may provide prognostic value in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study enrolling 300 patients admitted with ADHF. After stabilization and prior to discharge, all patients underwent ABPM and were categorized based on dipper patterns. Clinical outcomes, including mortality and re-hospitalization at 3 months, were assessed. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the cohort was 60.2 years; 68% were male. Most patients had HF with reduced ejection fraction (84%), and 57% were hypertensive. Dipper patterns were distributed: normal dipper 51%, non-dipper 36%, reverse dipper 11%, and extreme dipper 2%. At 3 months, mortality was 5.3% and re-hospitalization in 44% of patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed increased mortality in reverse dippers, highest average real variability percentile, and low/high MBPS groups (p<0.0001). Multivariable Cox regression identified extreme dipper (hazard ratio [HR], 9.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.85-46.49; p=0.007), reverse dipper (HR, 7.53; 95% CI, 2.47-22.10; p=0.01), low systolic BP (HR, 3.70; 95% CI, 1.22-11.22; p=0.02) associated to mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ABPM is a practical tool for risk stratification in HF. Abnormal nocturnal BP dipper patterns and increased BP variability were associated with increased adverse short-term outcomes in ADHF. Discharge ABPM may aid early risk stratification, while other circadian BP abnormalities primarily reflect disease severity rather than independent risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":101410,"journal":{"name":"International journal of heart failure","volume":"8 3","pages":"219-227"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13447190/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of heart failure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36628/ijhf.2025.0090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Heart failure (HF) remains a major cause of morbidity and frequent readmissions in India. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) offers dynamic evaluation of blood pressure (BP) patterns, BP variability and morning blood pressure surge (MBPS) which may provide prognostic value in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF).

Methods: A prospective observational study enrolling 300 patients admitted with ADHF. After stabilization and prior to discharge, all patients underwent ABPM and were categorized based on dipper patterns. Clinical outcomes, including mortality and re-hospitalization at 3 months, were assessed. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox regression.

Results: The mean age of the cohort was 60.2 years; 68% were male. Most patients had HF with reduced ejection fraction (84%), and 57% were hypertensive. Dipper patterns were distributed: normal dipper 51%, non-dipper 36%, reverse dipper 11%, and extreme dipper 2%. At 3 months, mortality was 5.3% and re-hospitalization in 44% of patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed increased mortality in reverse dippers, highest average real variability percentile, and low/high MBPS groups (p<0.0001). Multivariable Cox regression identified extreme dipper (hazard ratio [HR], 9.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.85-46.49; p=0.007), reverse dipper (HR, 7.53; 95% CI, 2.47-22.10; p=0.01), low systolic BP (HR, 3.70; 95% CI, 1.22-11.22; p=0.02) associated to mortality.

Conclusions: ABPM is a practical tool for risk stratification in HF. Abnormal nocturnal BP dipper patterns and increased BP variability were associated with increased adverse short-term outcomes in ADHF. Discharge ABPM may aid early risk stratification, while other circadian BP abnormalities primarily reflect disease severity rather than independent risk.

动态血压监测对急性失代偿性心力衰竭患者的预后价值:一项来自三级转诊中心的前瞻性观察研究
背景和目的:心力衰竭(HF)仍然是印度发病率和频繁再入院的主要原因。动态血压监测(ABPM)对急性失代偿性心力衰竭(ADHF)患者的血压(BP)模式、血压变异性和晨间血压激增(MBPS)进行动态评估,可能具有预后价值。方法:一项前瞻性观察研究,纳入300例ADHF患者。稳定后和出院前,所有患者都进行了ABPM,并根据杓型进行了分类。评估临床结果,包括3个月时的死亡率和再次住院。生存率分析采用Kaplan-Meier曲线和多变量Cox回归。结果:队列的平均年龄为60.2岁;68%是男性。大多数患者有心力衰竭伴射血分数降低(84%),57%为高血压。斗型分布:正斗51%,非斗36%,反斗11%,极端斗2%。3个月时,死亡率为5.3%,44%的患者再次住院。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,反向倾斜、最高平均真实变异性百分位数和低/高MBPS组的死亡率增加(结论:ABPM是心衰风险分层的实用工具)。夜间血压下降模式异常和血压变异性增加与ADHF的短期不良预后增加有关。出院ABPM可能有助于早期风险分层,而其他昼夜血压异常主要反映疾病严重程度,而不是独立风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书