The diverse relationship between self-prioritization effect and emotional valence: Self-positivity bias and self-negative repulsion.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Lingying Jin, Delin Yu, Jie Zhang, Mei Li, Hong Li
{"title":"The diverse relationship between self-prioritization effect and emotional valence: Self-positivity bias and self-negative repulsion.","authors":"Lingying Jin, Delin Yu, Jie Zhang, Mei Li, Hong Li","doi":"10.3758/s13415-026-01480-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although the self-positivity bias (SPB) suggests a preferential association with positive valence, emerging evidence indicates a more robust self-interaction with negativity. We propose self-negativity repulsion (SNR)-an active avoidance mechanism-as a distinct process complementing SPB. Using a novel nonsemantic paradigm, we examined the bidirectional influence between self-relevance (self, stranger, none) and emotional valence (positive, negative, neutral) across two tasks: one assessing emotional valence's impact on self-processing (Social Task), the other vice versa (Emotional Task). Analyses of behavioral (RTs) and electrophysiological data (ERPs, MVPC) revealed a dissociation. Positive valence yielded no behavioral benefits but showed subtle neural facilitation (e.g., enhanced decoding, distinct connectivity), suggesting a processing saturation effect. Conversely, negative valence consistently impaired behavior (slower RTs, reduced SPE). This was accompanied by a two-stage neural pattern: initial vigilance (a larger P2) followed by late-stage processing disruption (a reduced LPP). These findings provide converging evidence for dissociable SPB and SNR mechanisms. We suggest a dual-component model where SPB facilitates early processing and integration of positive self-information, while a distinct SNR mechanism actively modulates or inhibits negative self-information.</p>","PeriodicalId":50672,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-026-01480-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although the self-positivity bias (SPB) suggests a preferential association with positive valence, emerging evidence indicates a more robust self-interaction with negativity. We propose self-negativity repulsion (SNR)-an active avoidance mechanism-as a distinct process complementing SPB. Using a novel nonsemantic paradigm, we examined the bidirectional influence between self-relevance (self, stranger, none) and emotional valence (positive, negative, neutral) across two tasks: one assessing emotional valence's impact on self-processing (Social Task), the other vice versa (Emotional Task). Analyses of behavioral (RTs) and electrophysiological data (ERPs, MVPC) revealed a dissociation. Positive valence yielded no behavioral benefits but showed subtle neural facilitation (e.g., enhanced decoding, distinct connectivity), suggesting a processing saturation effect. Conversely, negative valence consistently impaired behavior (slower RTs, reduced SPE). This was accompanied by a two-stage neural pattern: initial vigilance (a larger P2) followed by late-stage processing disruption (a reduced LPP). These findings provide converging evidence for dissociable SPB and SNR mechanisms. We suggest a dual-component model where SPB facilitates early processing and integration of positive self-information, while a distinct SNR mechanism actively modulates or inhibits negative self-information.

自我优先效应与情绪效价的多元关系:自我积极偏向和自我消极排斥。
虽然自我积极倾向倾向(SPB)与正效倾向倾向相关,但新出现的证据表明,自我积极倾向倾向与负效倾向的相互作用更为强烈。我们提出自我负性排斥(SNR)-一种主动回避机制-作为补充SPB的独特过程。本研究采用一种新颖的非语义范式,考察了两种任务中自我关联(自我、陌生人、无)和情绪效价(积极、消极、中性)之间的双向影响:一种评估情绪效价对自我加工的影响(社会任务),另一种评估情绪效价对自我加工的影响(情绪任务)。行为(RTs)和电生理数据(erp, MVPC)的分析显示了分离。正效价对行为没有好处,但表现出微妙的神经促进作用(例如,解码增强,连接明显),表明加工饱和效应。相反,负效价持续损害行为(RTs变慢,SPE降低)。这伴随着一个两阶段的神经模式:最初的警觉(较大的P2),随后是后期的处理中断(降低的LPP)。这些发现为可分离SPB和信噪比机制提供了趋同的证据。我们提出了一个双成分模型,其中SPB促进积极自我信息的早期加工和整合,而独特的信噪比机制积极调节或抑制消极自我信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience (CABN) offers theoretical, review, and primary research articles on behavior and brain processes in humans. Coverage includes normal function as well as patients with injuries or processes that influence brain function: neurological disorders, including both healthy and disordered aging; and psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and depression. CABN is the leading vehicle for strongly psychologically motivated studies of brain–behavior relationships, through the presentation of papers that integrate psychological theory and the conduct and interpretation of the neuroscientific data. The range of topics includes perception, attention, memory, language, problem solving, reasoning, and decision-making; emotional processes, motivation, reward prediction, and affective states; and individual differences in relevant domains, including personality. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience is a publication of the Psychonomic Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书