Implementation of a national clinical guideline for cauda equina syndrome improves referral quality and reduces delays to MRI.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Orla Hennessy, Oisin M O'Connor, Niall P McGoldrick, Aiden Devitt, John F Quinlan
{"title":"Implementation of a national clinical guideline for cauda equina syndrome improves referral quality and reduces delays to MRI.","authors":"Orla Hennessy, Oisin M O'Connor, Niall P McGoldrick, Aiden Devitt, John F Quinlan","doi":"10.1016/j.surge.2026.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a neurological emergency with significant potential for permanent morbidity and medicolegal consequences. Timely MRI is essential, yet delays remain common. The Irish Health Service Executive (HSE) published a National Clinical Guideline for CES in June 2024. This study evaluates the impact of its introduction on referral quality and time to MRI in a tertiary, non-spinal centre.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of all suspected CES referrals from the emergency department to the orthopaedic department was performed over a 40-month period spanning guideline introduction (October 2022 to January 2026). Primary outcomes included triage-to-MRI and referral-to-MRI times. Secondary outcomes encompassed documentation of post-void residual volume (PVR), ASIA score, and red flag symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>124 pre-guideline and 71 post-guideline referrals were included. Mean triage-to-MRI time decreased from 20.5 to 13.0 h (36.5% reduction; p = 0.017), with standard deviation falling from 16.2 to 7.7 h, indicating greater consistency. The proportion scanned within 24 h rose from 73.9% to 89.1% (p = 0.046). Referral-to-MRI time was substantially longer for out-of-hours/weekend referrals than in-hours referrals in both periods (pre-guideline: 20.3 vs 7.2 h; post-guideline: 12.1 vs 4.3 h). ED-initiated MRI prior to orthopaedic referral increased from 1.5% to 26.1. Documentation improved across all metrics, with ASIA score recording showing the greatest improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of a national CES guideline significantly improved referral quality and reduced time to MRI. However, a persistent and clinically significant out-of-hours access gap highlights the need for dedicated overnight and weekend MRI pathways as a priority for future service development.</p>","PeriodicalId":49463,"journal":{"name":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2026.07.003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a neurological emergency with significant potential for permanent morbidity and medicolegal consequences. Timely MRI is essential, yet delays remain common. The Irish Health Service Executive (HSE) published a National Clinical Guideline for CES in June 2024. This study evaluates the impact of its introduction on referral quality and time to MRI in a tertiary, non-spinal centre.

Methods: A retrospective review of all suspected CES referrals from the emergency department to the orthopaedic department was performed over a 40-month period spanning guideline introduction (October 2022 to January 2026). Primary outcomes included triage-to-MRI and referral-to-MRI times. Secondary outcomes encompassed documentation of post-void residual volume (PVR), ASIA score, and red flag symptoms.

Results: 124 pre-guideline and 71 post-guideline referrals were included. Mean triage-to-MRI time decreased from 20.5 to 13.0 h (36.5% reduction; p = 0.017), with standard deviation falling from 16.2 to 7.7 h, indicating greater consistency. The proportion scanned within 24 h rose from 73.9% to 89.1% (p = 0.046). Referral-to-MRI time was substantially longer for out-of-hours/weekend referrals than in-hours referrals in both periods (pre-guideline: 20.3 vs 7.2 h; post-guideline: 12.1 vs 4.3 h). ED-initiated MRI prior to orthopaedic referral increased from 1.5% to 26.1. Documentation improved across all metrics, with ASIA score recording showing the greatest improvement.

Conclusion: Implementation of a national CES guideline significantly improved referral quality and reduced time to MRI. However, a persistent and clinically significant out-of-hours access gap highlights the need for dedicated overnight and weekend MRI pathways as a priority for future service development.

马尾综合征国家临床指南的实施提高了转诊质量,减少了MRI延误。
背景:马尾综合征(CES)是一种神经系统急症,具有永久性发病和医学后果的重大潜力。及时的核磁共振成像至关重要,但延迟仍然很常见。爱尔兰卫生服务执行局(HSE)于2024年6月发布了一份关于消费性生殖疾病的国家临床指南。本研究评估了在三级非脊柱中心引入MRI转诊质量和时间的影响。方法:回顾性分析从急诊科转介到骨科的所有疑似CES患者,时间跨度为指南引入(2022年10月至2026年1月)40个月。主要结局包括分诊至mri和转诊至mri的时间。次要结果包括空腔后残留体积(PVR)、ASIA评分和红旗症状的记录。结果:纳入124例指南前转诊和71例指南后转诊。平均分诊到mri时间从20.5降低到13.0 h(降低36.5%;p = 0.017),标准差从16.2降低到7.7 h,一致性增强。24 h内扫描的比例由73.9%上升到89.1% (p = 0.046)。在这两个时期,非工作时间/周末转诊到mri的时间比工作时间内转诊的时间要长得多(指南前:20.3 vs 7.2 h;指南后:12.1 vs 4.3 h)。骨科转诊前ed启动的MRI从1.5%增加到26.1%。所有指标的文档都得到了改善,其中ASIA的评分记录显示了最大的改善。结论:国家CES指南的实施显著提高了转诊质量,减少了MRI时间。然而,持续存在且临床意义重大的非工作时间访问差距突出了将专用的夜间和周末MRI路径作为未来服务发展的优先事项的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its establishment in 2003, The Surgeon has established itself as one of the leading multidisciplinary surgical titles, both in print and online. The Surgeon is published for the worldwide surgical and dental communities. The goal of the Journal is to achieve wider national and international recognition, through a commitment to excellence in original research. In addition, both Colleges see the Journal as an important educational service, and consequently there is a particular focus on post-graduate development. Much of our educational role will continue to be achieved through publishing expanded review articles by leaders in their field. Articles in related areas to surgery and dentistry, such as healthcare management and education, are also welcomed. We aim to educate, entertain, give insight into new surgical techniques and technology, and provide a forum for debate and discussion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书