Pathways into academia - A scoping review with implications for the health professions.

IF 3.4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Elizabeth Gatewood, Carrie Evans, Angel Kuo, Marianne Hultgren, Marieke van der Schaaf, Patricia O'sullivan
{"title":"Pathways into academia - A scoping review with implications for the health professions.","authors":"Elizabeth Gatewood, Carrie Evans, Angel Kuo, Marianne Hultgren, Marieke van der Schaaf, Patricia O'sullivan","doi":"10.1007/s10459-026-10571-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health professions are experiencing a shortage of faculty, especially faculty from diverse ethnic and racial backgrounds. While research on recruitment and retention is well established, there is a gap in the evidence on the factors that influence the decision to pursue an academic career. This scoping review aimed to identify facilitators and barriers to choosing an academic career, identify findings specific to underrepresented minority (URM) populations, and identify theories and models used in this research. Following Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review framework, we searched four databases for articles (Arksey & O'Malley, 2005). We included empirical studies within higher education settings in English since 2000. We reviewed 119 publications, primarily from North America and Europe, spanning medicine, nursing, pharmacy, dentistry, engineering, and general PhD preparation. Examining facilitators and barriers, we identified the overarching concept of ecosystem with three themes: (1) opportunity, (2) value, and (3) productivity. Facilitators included organizational and interpersonal support, research and teaching opportunities, mentorship, and academic productivity. Barriers involved a lack of career pathway and insufficient support. Fluidity within the ecosystem across areas of opportunity, value, and productivity influenced learners' career decisions. Few articles focused on learners from underrepresented populations, although many noted this gap and identified it as an opportunity for future research. Most articles did not specify or utilize a theory or model. The model proposed can enable researchers to conduct research, especially to encourage underrepresented learners to consider academic careers and to build theory in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":50959,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-026-10571-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Health professions are experiencing a shortage of faculty, especially faculty from diverse ethnic and racial backgrounds. While research on recruitment and retention is well established, there is a gap in the evidence on the factors that influence the decision to pursue an academic career. This scoping review aimed to identify facilitators and barriers to choosing an academic career, identify findings specific to underrepresented minority (URM) populations, and identify theories and models used in this research. Following Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review framework, we searched four databases for articles (Arksey & O'Malley, 2005). We included empirical studies within higher education settings in English since 2000. We reviewed 119 publications, primarily from North America and Europe, spanning medicine, nursing, pharmacy, dentistry, engineering, and general PhD preparation. Examining facilitators and barriers, we identified the overarching concept of ecosystem with three themes: (1) opportunity, (2) value, and (3) productivity. Facilitators included organizational and interpersonal support, research and teaching opportunities, mentorship, and academic productivity. Barriers involved a lack of career pathway and insufficient support. Fluidity within the ecosystem across areas of opportunity, value, and productivity influenced learners' career decisions. Few articles focused on learners from underrepresented populations, although many noted this gap and identified it as an opportunity for future research. Most articles did not specify or utilize a theory or model. The model proposed can enable researchers to conduct research, especially to encourage underrepresented learners to consider academic careers and to build theory in this area.

进入学术界的途径-对卫生专业的影响的范围审查。
卫生专业正面临师资短缺的问题,尤其是来自不同族裔和种族背景的师资。虽然关于招聘和留用的研究已经很成熟,但关于影响追求学术生涯决定的因素的证据还存在差距。本综述旨在确定选择学术生涯的促进因素和障碍,确定针对代表性不足的少数群体(URM)人群的研究结果,并确定本研究中使用的理论和模型。按照Arksey和O'Malley的范围审查框架,我们在四个数据库中搜索文章(Arksey和O'Malley, 2005)。自2000年以来,我们在英语高等教育环境中纳入了实证研究。我们回顾了119篇出版物,主要来自北美和欧洲,涵盖医学、护理、药学、牙科、工程和普通博士准备。通过研究促进因素和障碍,我们确定了生态系统的总体概念,包括三个主题:(1)机会,(2)价值,(3)生产力。促进因素包括组织和人际支持、研究和教学机会、指导和学术生产力。障碍包括缺乏职业道路和支持不足。在机会、价值和生产力领域的生态系统内的流动性影响着学习者的职业决策。很少有文章关注来自代表性不足的人群的学习者,尽管许多人注意到这一差距,并将其视为未来研究的机会。大多数文章没有具体说明或使用理论或模型。提出的模型可以使研究人员进行研究,特别是鼓励代表性不足的学习者考虑学术事业,并在这一领域建立理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Health Sciences Education is a forum for scholarly and state-of-the art research into all aspects of health sciences education. It will publish empirical studies as well as discussions of theoretical issues and practical implications. The primary focus of the Journal is linking theory to practice, thus priority will be given to papers that have a sound theoretical basis and strong methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书