Retention of fellows to the faculty at a research-intensive academic medical center: a mixed-methods study.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Medical Education Online Pub Date : 2026-12-31 Epub Date: 2026-08-07 DOI:10.1080/10872981.2026.2714642
Janice L Hanson, Maria Pérez, Yaheng Lu, Eva M Aagaard, Donna B Jeffe
{"title":"Retention of fellows to the faculty at a research-intensive academic medical center: a mixed-methods study.","authors":"Janice L Hanson, Maria Pérez, Yaheng Lu, Eva M Aagaard, Donna B Jeffe","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2026.2714642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As clinical practice provides >50% of medical schools' revenue, research-intensive medical schools often seek to retain fellows with clinical-care interests. Fellows' considerations when deciding whether to stay at research-intensive institutions where they trained remain understudied. We sought to identify experiential factors associated with faculty-position offers and decisions of fellows in training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a mixed-methods study using a survey and semi-structured interview. We invited 471 fellows training in all clinical departments at our institution to complete an anonymous survey between April and June 2021 to examine their level of agreement (strongly disagree [1] to strongly agree [7]) with positive training and mentoring experiences and their academic-medicine career goals in association with being offered a position and, if offered, accepting or declining. After survey completion, we invited fellows for interviews about their decision-making to seek, accept, or decline post-fellowship faculty-positions as well as what our institution could do to encourage fellows to accept offered positions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed survey data from 168 (35.7%) fellows. Of 48 fellows who were offered faculty positions, 21 accepted and 27 declined; 56 fellows were not offered a position and 64 were too early in training to have received an offer. Fellows who were offered/accepted positions reported higher mean (SD) agreement with positive training (5.9 [1.2]; <i>p</i> < 0.02) and mentoring (6.1 [1.0]; <i>p</i> < 0.001) experiences and having academic-medicine career goals (5.8 [0.8]; <i>p</i> < 0.001) than fellows in other faculty-offer groups. In interviews, 24 fellows reported career goals and institutional resources as influencing decisions. Fellows described institutional opportunities for intervention, especially enhanced communication about institutional priorities and potential positions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clear communication with clinical fellows about their academic-medicine career goals and fellowship-training and mentoring experiences can inform decision-making about faculty offers and better equip institutional leaders to retain fellows who align with institutional needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":"31 1","pages":"2714642"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13455691/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education Online","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2026.2714642","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As clinical practice provides >50% of medical schools' revenue, research-intensive medical schools often seek to retain fellows with clinical-care interests. Fellows' considerations when deciding whether to stay at research-intensive institutions where they trained remain understudied. We sought to identify experiential factors associated with faculty-position offers and decisions of fellows in training.

Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods study using a survey and semi-structured interview. We invited 471 fellows training in all clinical departments at our institution to complete an anonymous survey between April and June 2021 to examine their level of agreement (strongly disagree [1] to strongly agree [7]) with positive training and mentoring experiences and their academic-medicine career goals in association with being offered a position and, if offered, accepting or declining. After survey completion, we invited fellows for interviews about their decision-making to seek, accept, or decline post-fellowship faculty-positions as well as what our institution could do to encourage fellows to accept offered positions.

Results: We analyzed survey data from 168 (35.7%) fellows. Of 48 fellows who were offered faculty positions, 21 accepted and 27 declined; 56 fellows were not offered a position and 64 were too early in training to have received an offer. Fellows who were offered/accepted positions reported higher mean (SD) agreement with positive training (5.9 [1.2]; p < 0.02) and mentoring (6.1 [1.0]; p < 0.001) experiences and having academic-medicine career goals (5.8 [0.8]; p < 0.001) than fellows in other faculty-offer groups. In interviews, 24 fellows reported career goals and institutional resources as influencing decisions. Fellows described institutional opportunities for intervention, especially enhanced communication about institutional priorities and potential positions.

Conclusions: Clear communication with clinical fellows about their academic-medicine career goals and fellowship-training and mentoring experiences can inform decision-making about faculty offers and better equip institutional leaders to retain fellows who align with institutional needs.

在一个研究密集型学术医疗中心保留研究员:一项混合方法研究。
背景:由于临床实践提供了医学院50%的收入,研究密集型医学院通常寻求留住对临床护理感兴趣的研究员。研究人员在决定是否留在他们接受培训的研究密集型机构时,考虑的因素仍未得到充分研究。我们试图确定与教师职位提供和培训人员决定相关的经验因素。方法:采用调查法和半结构化访谈法进行混合方法研究。我们邀请了471名在我们机构所有临床部门接受培训的研究员,在2021年4月至6月期间完成了一项匿名调查,以检查他们对积极的培训和指导经历的同意程度(强烈反对[1]到强烈同意[7]),以及他们的学术医学职业目标与获得职位的关系,如果获得职位,接受或拒绝。在调查完成后,我们邀请研究员接受采访,了解他们寻求、接受或拒绝博士后教职职位的决定,以及我们的机构可以做些什么来鼓励研究员接受提供的职位。结果:我们分析了168名(35.7%)患者的调查数据。在获得教职的48名研究员中,21人接受,27人拒绝;56名研究员没有获得职位,64名由于培训太早而没有获得职位。被提供/接受职位的研究员报告了更高的平均(SD)与积极培训的一致性(5.9 [1.2];p p p结论:与临床研究员就其学术医学职业目标、奖学金培训和指导经历进行清晰的沟通,可以为教师招聘决策提供信息,并使机构领导者更好地留住符合机构需求的研究员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Education Online
Medical Education Online EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education Online is an open access journal of health care education, publishing peer-reviewed research, perspectives, reviews, and early documentation of new ideas and trends. Medical Education Online aims to disseminate information on the education and training of physicians and other health care professionals. Manuscripts may address any aspect of health care education and training, including, but not limited to: -Basic science education -Clinical science education -Residency education -Learning theory -Problem-based learning (PBL) -Curriculum development -Research design and statistics -Measurement and evaluation -Faculty development -Informatics/web
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书