Use of a cell saver device for perioperative autotransfusion in 102 dogs and one cat.

IF 1.3 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Veterinary Surgery Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-07 DOI:10.1111/vsu.70144
Anna Michalska, Jonathan Bray
{"title":"Use of a cell saver device for perioperative autotransfusion in 102 dogs and one cat.","authors":"Anna Michalska, Jonathan Bray","doi":"10.1111/vsu.70144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the application of a cell saver device (CSD) to manage blood loss in dogs and cats.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>A total of 102 client-owned dogs and one cat.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical records were reviewed for all animals in which autotransfusion using blood generated by the CSD was used. Data retrieved included signalment, surgical details, blood test results, degree of blood loss, blood collection method, transfusion volume, timing of administration, additional blood products used, variations in packed cell volume (PCV), and incidence of transfusion reactions. Short-term complications and overall outcome were assessed by telephone follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 103 autotransfusions performed, during emergency (n = 40) and elective (n = 63) procedures. The mean transfusion volume was 14 mL/kg. For every 1 mL of blood transfused per kilogram of bodyweight, PCV increased by approximately 0.6%. Allogeneic blood products (ABPs) were used in addition to autologous blood in 14% of cases. The transfusion reaction rate associated with autotransfusion was 1%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of a CSD appeared safe and versatile for management of blood loss in dogs. The inclusion of only a single feline case highlights the need for further studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of this technique in cats.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Autotransfusion using a CSD is applicable in a wide range of emergency and elective surgeries, presenting an alternative to ABPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23667,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1188-1197"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.70144","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To describe the application of a cell saver device (CSD) to manage blood loss in dogs and cats.

Study design: Retrospective study.

Animals: A total of 102 client-owned dogs and one cat.

Methods: Medical records were reviewed for all animals in which autotransfusion using blood generated by the CSD was used. Data retrieved included signalment, surgical details, blood test results, degree of blood loss, blood collection method, transfusion volume, timing of administration, additional blood products used, variations in packed cell volume (PCV), and incidence of transfusion reactions. Short-term complications and overall outcome were assessed by telephone follow-up.

Results: There were 103 autotransfusions performed, during emergency (n = 40) and elective (n = 63) procedures. The mean transfusion volume was 14 mL/kg. For every 1 mL of blood transfused per kilogram of bodyweight, PCV increased by approximately 0.6%. Allogeneic blood products (ABPs) were used in addition to autologous blood in 14% of cases. The transfusion reaction rate associated with autotransfusion was 1%.

Conclusion: The use of a CSD appeared safe and versatile for management of blood loss in dogs. The inclusion of only a single feline case highlights the need for further studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of this technique in cats.

Clinical significance: Autotransfusion using a CSD is applicable in a wide range of emergency and elective surgeries, presenting an alternative to ABPs.

细胞保存装置在102只狗和1只猫围手术期自身输血中的应用。
目的:描述细胞保存装置(CSD)在狗和猫失血管理中的应用。研究设计:回顾性研究。动物:共有102只客户拥有的狗和一只猫。方法:回顾了所有使用CSD产生的血液进行自身输血的动物的医疗记录。检索到的数据包括信号、手术细节、血液检查结果、失血程度、采血方法、输血量、给药时间、使用的其他血液制品、堆积细胞体积(PCV)的变化以及输血反应的发生率。通过电话随访评估短期并发症和总体结果。结果:103例自体输血,包括急诊(n = 40)和择期(n = 63)。平均输血量为14 mL/kg。每千克体重输血1毫升,PCV增加约0.6%。在14%的病例中,除了自体血液外,还使用同种异体血液制品(ABPs)。与自体输血相关的输血反应率为1%。结论:使用CSD对狗的失血管理是安全的和通用的。仅纳入一只猫的病例强调了进一步研究评估该技术在猫中的安全性和有效性的必要性。临床意义:使用CSD的自体输血广泛适用于急诊和选择性手术,是abp的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary Surgery
Veterinary Surgery 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
22.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Surgery, the official publication of the American College of Veterinary Surgeons and European College of Veterinary Surgeons, is a source of up-to-date coverage of surgical and anesthetic management of animals, addressing significant problems in veterinary surgery with relevant case histories and observations. It contains original, peer-reviewed articles that cover developments in veterinary surgery, and presents the most current review of the field, with timely articles on surgical techniques, diagnostic aims, care of infections, and advances in knowledge of metabolism as it affects the surgical patient. The journal places new developments in perspective, encompassing new concepts and peer commentary to help better understand and evaluate the surgical patient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书