A Hitchhiker's Guide to Physical and Cognitive Effort.

IF 11 1区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Lukas Hack, Israel Halperin, Wanja Wolff
{"title":"A Hitchhiker's Guide to Physical and Cognitive Effort.","authors":"Lukas Hack, Israel Halperin, Wanja Wolff","doi":"10.1007/s40279-026-02510-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Effort is integral to the regulation of behavior. It can be central for achieving goals in a range of activities, including sports, exercise, learning, and work. For centuries, researchers have tried to understand what effort is and how it shapes human behavior. Yet, despite its importance, there is no overarching consensus on what effort represents and how it should be measured. Attesting to this, academic disciplines conceptualize and measure effort in strikingly different ways. While this highlights the multitude of factors relevant to understanding effort, it has also led to siloed approaches, making interdisciplinary integration challenging. To facilitate interdisciplinary exchange, this guide aims to provide a descriptive and impartial overview of frequently used effort conceptualization and proxies. We first review three prominent conceptualizations of effort: force-based, resource-based, and mediation-based accounts. Second, we present a broad overview of commonly used effort proxies, reflecting changes in one system: neurophysiological, metabolic, psychological, and behavioral output. For each, we provide a brief review of properties, applications, and limitations relevant to effort-related research. With this approach, our aim is not to resolve disciplinary differences by pitting the utility of different conceptualizations and proxies against each other. Rather, we aim to provide a shared conceptual framework on which more integrative theorizing and cumulative progress in effort research can be achieved across disciplines.</p>","PeriodicalId":21969,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-026-02510-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effort is integral to the regulation of behavior. It can be central for achieving goals in a range of activities, including sports, exercise, learning, and work. For centuries, researchers have tried to understand what effort is and how it shapes human behavior. Yet, despite its importance, there is no overarching consensus on what effort represents and how it should be measured. Attesting to this, academic disciplines conceptualize and measure effort in strikingly different ways. While this highlights the multitude of factors relevant to understanding effort, it has also led to siloed approaches, making interdisciplinary integration challenging. To facilitate interdisciplinary exchange, this guide aims to provide a descriptive and impartial overview of frequently used effort conceptualization and proxies. We first review three prominent conceptualizations of effort: force-based, resource-based, and mediation-based accounts. Second, we present a broad overview of commonly used effort proxies, reflecting changes in one system: neurophysiological, metabolic, psychological, and behavioral output. For each, we provide a brief review of properties, applications, and limitations relevant to effort-related research. With this approach, our aim is not to resolve disciplinary differences by pitting the utility of different conceptualizations and proxies against each other. Rather, we aim to provide a shared conceptual framework on which more integrative theorizing and cumulative progress in effort research can be achieved across disciplines.

《身体和认知努力的搭便车指南》。
努力是行为规范不可或缺的一部分。它是实现一系列活动目标的核心,包括运动、锻炼、学习和工作。几个世纪以来,研究人员一直试图理解努力是什么,以及它如何塑造人类行为。然而,尽管它很重要,但对于努力代表什么以及应该如何衡量,并没有达成总体共识。证明这一点的是,学术学科以截然不同的方式概念化和衡量努力。虽然这突出了与理解努力相关的众多因素,但它也导致了孤立的方法,使跨学科集成具有挑战性。为了促进跨学科的交流,本指南旨在对经常使用的努力概念化和代理提供一个描述性和公正的概述。我们首先回顾三个突出的努力概念:基于力量的、基于资源的和基于中介的账户。其次,我们提出了一个广泛的概述常用的努力代理,反映一个系统的变化:神经生理,代谢,心理和行为输出。对于每一个,我们提供了一个简短的性质,应用程序和限制相关的努力相关的研究综述。使用这种方法,我们的目标不是通过将不同概念化和代理的效用相互对立来解决学科差异。相反,我们的目标是提供一个共享的概念框架,在这个框架上,跨学科的努力研究可以实现更综合的理论化和累积的进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sports Medicine
Sports Medicine 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
165
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Sports Medicine focuses on providing definitive and comprehensive review articles that interpret and evaluate current literature, aiming to offer insights into research findings in the sports medicine and exercise field. The journal covers major topics such as sports medicine and sports science, medical syndromes associated with sport and exercise, clinical medicine's role in injury prevention and treatment, exercise for rehabilitation and health, and the application of physiological and biomechanical principles to specific sports. Types of Articles: Review Articles: Definitive and comprehensive reviews that interpret and evaluate current literature to provide rationale for and application of research findings. Leading/Current Opinion Articles: Overviews of contentious or emerging issues in the field. Original Research Articles: High-quality research articles. Enhanced Features: Additional features like slide sets, videos, and animations aimed at increasing the visibility, readership, and educational value of the journal's content. Plain Language Summaries: Summaries accompanying articles to assist readers in understanding important medical advances. Peer Review Process: All manuscripts undergo peer review by international experts to ensure quality and rigor. The journal also welcomes Letters to the Editor, which will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书