A multidimensional item response theory analysis of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire: measurement precision, differential item functioning, and potential for item reduction.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Henry U Michael, Todd A Wilson, Danielle A Southern, Oluwagbohunmi A Awosoga, Michelle M Graham, Stephen B Wilton, Matthew T James, Lisa M Lix, Tolulope T Sajobi
{"title":"A multidimensional item response theory analysis of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire: measurement precision, differential item functioning, and potential for item reduction.","authors":"Henry U Michael, Todd A Wilson, Danielle A Southern, Oluwagbohunmi A Awosoga, Michelle M Graham, Stephen B Wilton, Matthew T James, Lisa M Lix, Tolulope T Sajobi","doi":"10.1007/s11136-026-04368-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) is widely used to measure disease-specific health status in coronary artery disease, but its psychometric properties have not been evaluated using multidimensional item response theory (MIRT). We evaluated the SAQ's dimensional structure, measurement precision, differential item functioning (DIF), and short form performance in a population-based cohort.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>SAQ responses collected within two weeks of coronary angiography from 6,665 patients in the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) registry were analyzed using a confirmatory five-factor multidimensional graded response model. Item fit, local dependence, and conditional standard errors were evaluated. DIF by sex and age was examined using a two-step anchored multigroup approach. Short forms were derived based on discrimination, test information, and DIF magnitude.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The confirmatory five-factor model demonstrated good global fit (RMSEA = 0.031, CFI = 0.987, TLI = 0.982), supporting three distinct Physical Limitation dimensions: Basic, Moderate, and Strenuous. Empirical reliability ranged from 0.748 (Basic Physical Limitation) to 0.900 (Moderate Physical Limitation), with precision sufficient for individual-level interpretation in Moderate and Strenuous Physical Limitation. Moderate sex-related DIF was noted on Basic and Moderate Physical Limitation items, with females scoring lower than males. Age-related DIF was negligible to small. The 14-item short form preserved all five factors with theta correlations of 0.964 with the 18-item version.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MIRT revealed three distinct Physical Limitation dimensions, enabling targeted functional monitoring. Precision gradients and sex-related DIF inform interpretation, and the 14-item short form is supported as the preferred version.</p>","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":"35 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality of Life Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-026-04368-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) is widely used to measure disease-specific health status in coronary artery disease, but its psychometric properties have not been evaluated using multidimensional item response theory (MIRT). We evaluated the SAQ's dimensional structure, measurement precision, differential item functioning (DIF), and short form performance in a population-based cohort.

Method: SAQ responses collected within two weeks of coronary angiography from 6,665 patients in the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) registry were analyzed using a confirmatory five-factor multidimensional graded response model. Item fit, local dependence, and conditional standard errors were evaluated. DIF by sex and age was examined using a two-step anchored multigroup approach. Short forms were derived based on discrimination, test information, and DIF magnitude.

Result: The confirmatory five-factor model demonstrated good global fit (RMSEA = 0.031, CFI = 0.987, TLI = 0.982), supporting three distinct Physical Limitation dimensions: Basic, Moderate, and Strenuous. Empirical reliability ranged from 0.748 (Basic Physical Limitation) to 0.900 (Moderate Physical Limitation), with precision sufficient for individual-level interpretation in Moderate and Strenuous Physical Limitation. Moderate sex-related DIF was noted on Basic and Moderate Physical Limitation items, with females scoring lower than males. Age-related DIF was negligible to small. The 14-item short form preserved all five factors with theta correlations of 0.964 with the 18-item version.

Conclusion: MIRT revealed three distinct Physical Limitation dimensions, enabling targeted functional monitoring. Precision gradients and sex-related DIF inform interpretation, and the 14-item short form is supported as the preferred version.

西雅图心绞痛问卷的多维项目反应理论分析:测量精度、差异项目功能和项目减少潜力。
目的:西雅图心绞痛问卷(SAQ)被广泛用于测量冠状动脉疾病的疾病特异性健康状况,但其心理测量特性尚未采用多维项目反应理论(MIRT)进行评估。我们在以人群为基础的队列中评估了SAQ的维度结构、测量精度、差异项目功能(DIF)和简短形式表现。方法:从阿尔伯塔省冠心病结局评估项目(APPROACH)登记的6,665名患者中收集的冠状动脉造影两周内的SAQ回答,使用验证性五因素多维分级反应模型进行分析。评估项目拟合、局部依赖和条件标准误差。采用两步锚定多组方法检查性别和年龄的DIF。根据判别、测试信息和DIF大小推导出短形式。结果:验证性五因素模型整体拟合良好(RMSEA = 0.031, CFI = 0.987, TLI = 0.982),支持基本、中等和剧烈三个不同的物理限制维度。经验信度范围从0.748(基本物理限制)到0.900(中度物理限制),精度足以在中度和剧烈物理限制中进行个人层面的解释。在基本和中度身体限制项目中存在中度与性别相关的DIF,女性得分低于男性。与年龄相关的DIF可以忽略不计。14项短表保留了所有5个因素,与18项短表的theta相关系数为0.964。结论:MIRT显示了三个不同的物理限制维度,实现了有针对性的功能监测。精度梯度和与性别相关的DIF通知解释,并且支持14项简短形式作为首选版本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quality of Life Research
Quality of Life Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
8.60%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Quality of Life Research is an international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the rapid communication of original research, theoretical articles and methodological reports related to the field of quality of life, in all the health sciences. The journal also offers editorials, literature, book and software reviews, correspondence and abstracts of conferences. Quality of life has become a prominent issue in biometry, philosophy, social science, clinical medicine, health services and outcomes research. The journal''s scope reflects the wide application of quality of life assessment and research in the biological and social sciences. All original work is subject to peer review for originality, scientific quality and relevance to a broad readership. This is an official journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书