Development, Reliability, and Validity Testing of a KAP-Based Analgesic Assessment Scale.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Siping Yu, Chunlin Zhou, Chunmei Yang, Guojiang Zheng, Min Yu, Qirong Lei
{"title":"Development, Reliability, and Validity Testing of a KAP-Based Analgesic Assessment Scale.","authors":"Siping Yu, Chunlin Zhou, Chunmei Yang, Guojiang Zheng, Min Yu, Qirong Lei","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2026.07.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop a multidimensional KAP assessment scale evaluating patients' knowledge, attitude and practice toward analgesics, test its reliability and validity, and offer a standardized evaluation tool to carry out targeted health education and boost medication adherence among pain patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Methodological research of scale development and psychometric verification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The initial item pool was established based on KAP theoretical framework, relevant literature review and Delphi expert consultation, followed by item screening to form the preliminary scale. A convenience sampling strategy was adopted. A total of 200 inpatients and outpatients from the pain department, oncology department, bone and joint surgery department, and spinal surgery department of a local tertiary hospital were enrolled to complete the questionnaire. Item analysis, internal consistency reliability test, content validity evaluation, and exploratory factor analysis were conducted to comprehensively verify the psychometric properties of the scale, with the statistical significance level set as α = 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The finalized scale contained 17 items covering three dimensions: 9 knowledge items, 5 attitude (belief) items and 3 practice (behavior) items. The overall Cronbach's α of the scale was 0.85. Deleting any single item could not raise the overall Cronbach's α, and the Cronbach's α of each dimension remained above 0.82. The item-level content validity index (I-CVI) of all items was ≥ 0.98, and the scale-level content validity index (S-CVI) reached 0.91. Exploratory factor analysis extracted five common latent factors, which jointly explained 71.16% of the total variance of all items.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The self-developed multidimensional KAP scale for patients' cognition, belief and behavior related to analgesics possesses satisfactory reliability, good construct validity and favorable clinical applicability. It can serve as a reliable quantitative evaluation instrument for pain-related patient assessment.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>This standardized KAP scale can help clinical medical staff objectively identify patients' misunderstandings, negative attitudes and non-compliant behaviors regarding analgesic use. It supports personalized pain health education, standardizes refined pain management, optimizes patients' analgesic medication compliance, and ultimately improves the overall quality of clinical pain control.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2026.07.015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To develop a multidimensional KAP assessment scale evaluating patients' knowledge, attitude and practice toward analgesics, test its reliability and validity, and offer a standardized evaluation tool to carry out targeted health education and boost medication adherence among pain patients.

Design: Methodological research of scale development and psychometric verification.

Methods: The initial item pool was established based on KAP theoretical framework, relevant literature review and Delphi expert consultation, followed by item screening to form the preliminary scale. A convenience sampling strategy was adopted. A total of 200 inpatients and outpatients from the pain department, oncology department, bone and joint surgery department, and spinal surgery department of a local tertiary hospital were enrolled to complete the questionnaire. Item analysis, internal consistency reliability test, content validity evaluation, and exploratory factor analysis were conducted to comprehensively verify the psychometric properties of the scale, with the statistical significance level set as α = 0.05.

Results: The finalized scale contained 17 items covering three dimensions: 9 knowledge items, 5 attitude (belief) items and 3 practice (behavior) items. The overall Cronbach's α of the scale was 0.85. Deleting any single item could not raise the overall Cronbach's α, and the Cronbach's α of each dimension remained above 0.82. The item-level content validity index (I-CVI) of all items was ≥ 0.98, and the scale-level content validity index (S-CVI) reached 0.91. Exploratory factor analysis extracted five common latent factors, which jointly explained 71.16% of the total variance of all items.

Conclusions: The self-developed multidimensional KAP scale for patients' cognition, belief and behavior related to analgesics possesses satisfactory reliability, good construct validity and favorable clinical applicability. It can serve as a reliable quantitative evaluation instrument for pain-related patient assessment.

Clinical significance: This standardized KAP scale can help clinical medical staff objectively identify patients' misunderstandings, negative attitudes and non-compliant behaviors regarding analgesic use. It supports personalized pain health education, standardizes refined pain management, optimizes patients' analgesic medication compliance, and ultimately improves the overall quality of clinical pain control.

基于kap的镇痛评估量表的开发、信度和效度测试。
目的:编制多维度的KAP量表,评估患者对镇痛药的知识、态度和行为,并检验其信度和效度,为开展有针对性的健康教育和提高疼痛患者的药物依从性提供标准化的评估工具。设计:量表开发与心理测量验证的方法学研究。方法:基于KAP理论框架、相关文献回顾和德尔菲专家咨询建立初始题库,进行题项筛选形成初步量表。采用方便采样策略。选取当地某三级医院疼痛科、肿瘤科、骨关节外科、脊柱外科共200名住院和门诊患者完成问卷调查。采用项目分析、内部一致性信度检验、内容效度评价和探索性因子分析对量表的心理测量特性进行综合验证,显著性水平设为α = 0.05。结果:定稿的量表共17个项目,涵盖三个维度:9个知识项目、5个态度(信念)项目和3个实践(行为)项目。量表的总体Cronbach's α为0.85。删除任何单项并不能提高整体Cronbach’s α,各维度的Cronbach’s α保持在0.82以上。所有条目的项目级内容效度指数(I-CVI)均≥0.98,量表级内容效度指数(S-CVI)达到0.91。探索性因子分析提取了5个常见的潜在因子,它们共同解释了所有项目总方差的71.16%。结论:自行编制的患者镇痛药认知、信念和行为多维度KAP量表具有满意的信度、良好的结构效度和良好的临床适用性。它可以作为一种可靠的定量评估工具,用于疼痛相关患者的评估。临床意义:该标准化的KAP量表可以帮助临床医务人员客观地识别患者对镇痛药使用的误解、消极态度和不合规行为。支持个性化疼痛健康教育,规范精细疼痛管理,优化患者镇痛用药依从性,最终提高临床疼痛控制的整体质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Management Nursing
Pain Management Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书