The Impact of Denoising Approaches on the Relationship Between Alzheimer's Disease Diagnostic Status and Network Topology Measures

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Jenna K. Blujus, Hwamee Oh, for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
{"title":"The Impact of Denoising Approaches on the Relationship Between Alzheimer's Disease Diagnostic Status and Network Topology Measures","authors":"Jenna K. Blujus,&nbsp;Hwamee Oh,&nbsp;for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative","doi":"10.1002/hbm.70622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Graph theory provides a promising technique to investigate Alzheimer's disease (AD)-related alterations in brain network properties. However, there are discrepancies in the reported disruptions that occur to network topology across the AD continuum. In this study, we examined whether diagnostic group differences in graph metrics are attributed to differences in denoising approach used in fMRI processing. Resting state data from 60 cognitively normal (CN), 55 Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), and 38 <span>AD</span> participants from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database were denoised using 11 pipelines including combinations of confound regression (head motion parameters, white matter [WM], cerebrospinal fluid [CSF], global signal), volume censoring (scrubbing, spike regression), and component-based noise removal (Independent Component Analysis-based Automatic Removal of Motion Artifacts [ICA-AROMA], anatomical and temporal component correction). Graph metrics representing network segregation (clustering coefficient, modularity, local efficiency), network integration (largest connected component, path length, global efficiency), and small-worldness were calculated. The results revealed that diagnostic group differences in modularity and local efficiency were dependent on denoising approach, especially in high-parameter regression models in combination with censoring methods (36 parameters and spike regressor or volume censoring). Independent of denoising approach, CN exhibited more segregated (clustering coefficient) but less integrated (largest component, path length, global efficiency) networks than MCI and AD. Independent of diagnosis, denoising strategy significantly affected the magnitude of all metrics, particularly models including global signal regression. Collectively, these results suggest that the directionality of the diagnostic differences in network topology, particularly in global metrics of network segregation, can vary based upon the denoising approach employed, although the effect size is small. Transparent reporting of preprocessing decisions is critical for the accurate interpretation of graph theoretical findings in the context of AD and a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying pathological aging.</p>","PeriodicalId":13019,"journal":{"name":"Human Brain Mapping","volume":"47 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13451523/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Brain Mapping","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.70622","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Graph theory provides a promising technique to investigate Alzheimer's disease (AD)-related alterations in brain network properties. However, there are discrepancies in the reported disruptions that occur to network topology across the AD continuum. In this study, we examined whether diagnostic group differences in graph metrics are attributed to differences in denoising approach used in fMRI processing. Resting state data from 60 cognitively normal (CN), 55 Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), and 38 AD participants from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database were denoised using 11 pipelines including combinations of confound regression (head motion parameters, white matter [WM], cerebrospinal fluid [CSF], global signal), volume censoring (scrubbing, spike regression), and component-based noise removal (Independent Component Analysis-based Automatic Removal of Motion Artifacts [ICA-AROMA], anatomical and temporal component correction). Graph metrics representing network segregation (clustering coefficient, modularity, local efficiency), network integration (largest connected component, path length, global efficiency), and small-worldness were calculated. The results revealed that diagnostic group differences in modularity and local efficiency were dependent on denoising approach, especially in high-parameter regression models in combination with censoring methods (36 parameters and spike regressor or volume censoring). Independent of denoising approach, CN exhibited more segregated (clustering coefficient) but less integrated (largest component, path length, global efficiency) networks than MCI and AD. Independent of diagnosis, denoising strategy significantly affected the magnitude of all metrics, particularly models including global signal regression. Collectively, these results suggest that the directionality of the diagnostic differences in network topology, particularly in global metrics of network segregation, can vary based upon the denoising approach employed, although the effect size is small. Transparent reporting of preprocessing decisions is critical for the accurate interpretation of graph theoretical findings in the context of AD and a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying pathological aging.

去噪方法对阿尔茨海默病诊断状态与网络拓扑度量关系的影响。
图论为研究阿尔茨海默病(AD)相关脑网络特性的改变提供了一种很有前途的技术。然而,在AD连续体的网络拓扑中发生的报告中断存在差异。在这项研究中,我们研究了诊断组在图形度量上的差异是否归因于fMRI处理中使用的去噪方法的差异。来自阿尔茨海默病神经影像学计划(ADNI)数据库的60名认知正常(CN)、55名轻度认知障碍(MCI)和38名AD参与者的静息状态数据使用11个管道进行去噪,包括混合回归(头部运动参数、白质、脑脊液、全局信号)、体积剔除(刷洗、峰值回归)、以及基于分量的噪声去除(基于独立分量分析的自动去除运动伪影[ICA-AROMA],解剖和时间分量校正)。计算了表示网络隔离(聚类系数、模块化、局部效率)、网络集成(最大连接组件、路径长度、全局效率)和小世界性的图度量。结果表明,诊断组在模块性和局部效率方面的差异取决于去噪方法,特别是在高参数回归模型与滤波方法(36参数和峰值回归或体积滤波)相结合的情况下。在不去噪的情况下,与MCI和AD相比,CN表现出更多的分离性(聚类系数),但更少的集成性(最大分量、路径长度、全局效率)。独立于诊断,去噪策略显著影响所有指标的大小,特别是包括全局信号回归的模型。总的来说,这些结果表明,网络拓扑中诊断差异的方向性,特别是在网络隔离的全局度量中,可以根据所采用的去噪方法而变化,尽管效应大小很小。透明的预处理决策报告对于准确解释AD背景下的图形理论发现和更好地理解病理性衰老的机制至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Brain Mapping
Human Brain Mapping 医学-核医学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
401
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Brain Mapping publishes peer-reviewed basic, clinical, technical, and theoretical research in the interdisciplinary and rapidly expanding field of human brain mapping. The journal features research derived from non-invasive brain imaging modalities used to explore the spatial and temporal organization of the neural systems supporting human behavior. Imaging modalities of interest include positron emission tomography, event-related potentials, electro-and magnetoencephalography, magnetic resonance imaging, and single-photon emission tomography. Brain mapping research in both normal and clinical populations is encouraged. Article formats include Research Articles, Review Articles, Clinical Case Studies, and Technique, as well as Technological Developments, Theoretical Articles, and Synthetic Reviews. Technical advances, such as novel brain imaging methods, analyses for detecting or localizing neural activity, synergistic uses of multiple imaging modalities, and strategies for the design of behavioral paradigms and neural-systems modeling are of particular interest. The journal endorses the propagation of methodological standards and encourages database development in the field of human brain mapping.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书