Farzad Pourghazi, Seyed Mohammad Amin Alavi, Takahiro Matsuo, Georges Baaklini, Matthew P Abdel, Aaron J Tande, Elie F Berbari
{"title":"Management and outcomes of culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Farzad Pourghazi, Seyed Mohammad Amin Alavi, Takahiro Matsuo, Georges Baaklini, Matthew P Abdel, Aaron J Tande, Elie F Berbari","doi":"10.5194/jbji-11-413-2026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>: Culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection (CN-PJI) remains a major diagnostic and therapeutic challenge because antimicrobial and surgical management are often empirical. <b>Methods</b>: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate treatment strategies and outcomes of CN-PJI. MEDLINE and Scopus were searched through 3 July 2025, and 27 cohort studies including 1399 CN-PJI patients were included. <b>Results</b>: Random-effect meta-analyses showed a pooled treatment success proportion of 83.6 % (95 % CI, 78.2-87.9), a pooled failure proportion of 17.2 % (95 % CI, 12.6-22.9), and a pooled mortality proportion of 2.4 % (95 % CI, 1.3-4.6). Subgroup analyses demonstrated lower success and higher failure with debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention compared with one-stage and two-stage exchange arthroplasty. Hip CN-PJI showed higher reported success than knee CN-PJI. Antimicrobial regimens were highly heterogeneous and were not suitable for pooled analysis. <b>Conclusion</b>: Overall, CN-PJI may have favorable outcomes, particularly with exchange arthroplasty, but prospective studies with standardized definitions and treatment reporting are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","volume":"11 4","pages":"413-430"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13448843/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-11-413-2026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection (CN-PJI) remains a major diagnostic and therapeutic challenge because antimicrobial and surgical management are often empirical. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate treatment strategies and outcomes of CN-PJI. MEDLINE and Scopus were searched through 3 July 2025, and 27 cohort studies including 1399 CN-PJI patients were included. Results: Random-effect meta-analyses showed a pooled treatment success proportion of 83.6 % (95 % CI, 78.2-87.9), a pooled failure proportion of 17.2 % (95 % CI, 12.6-22.9), and a pooled mortality proportion of 2.4 % (95 % CI, 1.3-4.6). Subgroup analyses demonstrated lower success and higher failure with debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention compared with one-stage and two-stage exchange arthroplasty. Hip CN-PJI showed higher reported success than knee CN-PJI. Antimicrobial regimens were highly heterogeneous and were not suitable for pooled analysis. Conclusion: Overall, CN-PJI may have favorable outcomes, particularly with exchange arthroplasty, but prospective studies with standardized definitions and treatment reporting are needed.