The Neural Basis of Avoidance Learning and Its Relation to Safety Processing.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
eNeuro Pub Date : 2026-08-26 Print Date: 2026-08-01 DOI:10.1523/ENEURO.0170-26.2026
Lieselotte Claes, Patrick A F Laing, Trevor Steward, Kim L Felmingham, Bram Vervliet, Christopher G Davey, Bradford Moffat, Rebecca K Glarin, Ben J Harrison
{"title":"The Neural Basis of Avoidance Learning and Its Relation to Safety Processing.","authors":"Lieselotte Claes, Patrick A F Laing, Trevor Steward, Kim L Felmingham, Bram Vervliet, Christopher G Davey, Bradford Moffat, Rebecca K Glarin, Ben J Harrison","doi":"10.1523/ENEURO.0170-26.2026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Persistent avoidance plays a major role in maintaining anxiety disorders. The few studies that have explored the neural basis of avoidance have predominantly examined established avoidance behaviors rather than the learning processes that establish avoidance responses. We aimed to characterize the temporal dynamics and neural mechanisms of avoidance learning using a novel paradigm combined with 7 tesla fMRI in 82 healthy participants (37 male and 45 female). Participants were first conditioned to two threat stimuli and a compound safety stimulus. Next, they were trained to avoid one threat stimulus while the other remained unavoidable. Behavioral data confirmed accurate learning of task contingencies. Successful avoidance was associated with prominent activation of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex compared with unsuccessful avoidance, with additional nucleus accumbens and orbitofrontal cortex engagement when compared with safety learning (<i>P</i> <sub>FDR</sub> whole-brain corrected). Critically, early compared with late avoidance learning was distinctly associated with activation of midbrain-striatal circuits, including the periaqueductal gray (PAG), mediodorsal thalamus, substantia nigra, and anterior insular cortex-regions associated with threat processing and learning-related signaling. These findings suggest that initial avoidance learning relies on subcortical threat-responsive and learning-related circuits, whereas established avoidance responses engage cortical safety-processing regions. This dissociation parallels recent findings in safety learning and provides novel mechanistic insights for interventions targeting maladaptive avoidance patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":11617,"journal":{"name":"eNeuro","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13528696/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eNeuro","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0170-26.2026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Persistent avoidance plays a major role in maintaining anxiety disorders. The few studies that have explored the neural basis of avoidance have predominantly examined established avoidance behaviors rather than the learning processes that establish avoidance responses. We aimed to characterize the temporal dynamics and neural mechanisms of avoidance learning using a novel paradigm combined with 7 tesla fMRI in 82 healthy participants (37 male and 45 female). Participants were first conditioned to two threat stimuli and a compound safety stimulus. Next, they were trained to avoid one threat stimulus while the other remained unavoidable. Behavioral data confirmed accurate learning of task contingencies. Successful avoidance was associated with prominent activation of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex compared with unsuccessful avoidance, with additional nucleus accumbens and orbitofrontal cortex engagement when compared with safety learning (P FDR whole-brain corrected). Critically, early compared with late avoidance learning was distinctly associated with activation of midbrain-striatal circuits, including the periaqueductal gray (PAG), mediodorsal thalamus, substantia nigra, and anterior insular cortex-regions associated with threat processing and learning-related signaling. These findings suggest that initial avoidance learning relies on subcortical threat-responsive and learning-related circuits, whereas established avoidance responses engage cortical safety-processing regions. This dissociation parallels recent findings in safety learning and provides novel mechanistic insights for interventions targeting maladaptive avoidance patterns.

回避学习的神经基础及其与安全加工的关系。
持续回避在维持焦虑障碍中起着重要作用。少数探索回避的神经基础的研究主要是研究既定的回避行为,而不是建立回避反应的学习过程。我们的目的是利用一种新的范式结合7-特斯拉功能磁共振成像(fMRI)来表征82名健康参与者(37名男性和45名女性)的回避学习的时间动态和神经机制。参与者首先接受两种威胁刺激和一种复合安全刺激。接下来,他们被训练避免一种威胁刺激,而另一种仍然不可避免。行为数据证实了任务偶然性的准确学习。与不成功的回避相比,成功的回避与腹内侧前额叶皮层(vmPFC)、后扣带皮层(PCC)和腹外侧前额叶皮层的显著激活有关,与安全学习相比,额外的伏隔核和眶额皮质参与(P FDR全脑校正)。至关重要的是,与晚期相比,早期回避学习明显与中脑纹状体回路的激活相关,包括导水管周围灰质(PAG)、丘脑中背侧、黑质和前岛叶皮质,这些区域与威胁处理和学习相关的信号传导有关。这些发现表明,最初的回避学习依赖于皮层下的威胁反应和学习相关回路,而建立的回避反应则依赖于皮层的安全处理区域。这种分离与最近在安全学习方面的发现相似,并为针对不适应回避模式的干预提供了新的机制见解。回避行为是焦虑障碍的核心,然而,人们对学习回避的神经机制知之甚少。利用7-特斯拉功能磁共振成像和82名参与者的新范式,我们发现人类最初的回避学习涉及中脑纹状体回路——包括导尿管周围灰质、黑质和丘脑——而建立的回避依赖于以腹内侧前额叶皮层为中心的皮质安全处理区域。这种时间分离与巴甫洛夫安全学习的最新发现相似,并确定了一个潜在的机制窗口,在此期间,不适应的回避模式可能最容易受到干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
eNeuro
eNeuro Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
486
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An open-access journal from the Society for Neuroscience, eNeuro publishes high-quality, broad-based, peer-reviewed research focused solely on the field of neuroscience. eNeuro embodies an emerging scientific vision that offers a new experience for authors and readers, all in support of the Society’s mission to advance understanding of the brain and nervous system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书