Ecological Irreplaceability in the Era of Nature Positive

IF 5.5 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Martine Maron, Michelle Ward, Jeremy S. Simmonds, Brendan A. Wintle, Hugh P. Possingham, Ruben Venegas, Donald Butler, Andrew Macintosh, April E. Reside, Laura Sonter, Daniel C. Dunn, Ailsa Kerswell, Jaana Dielenberg, James E. M. Watson
{"title":"Ecological Irreplaceability in the Era of Nature Positive","authors":"Martine Maron,&nbsp;Michelle Ward,&nbsp;Jeremy S. Simmonds,&nbsp;Brendan A. Wintle,&nbsp;Hugh P. Possingham,&nbsp;Ruben Venegas,&nbsp;Donald Butler,&nbsp;Andrew Macintosh,&nbsp;April E. Reside,&nbsp;Laura Sonter,&nbsp;Daniel C. Dunn,&nbsp;Ailsa Kerswell,&nbsp;Jaana Dielenberg,&nbsp;James E. M. Watson","doi":"10.1111/con4.70073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Global biodiversity decline has breached safe limits, prompting ambitious goals to halt and reverse nature loss. Meeting these goals requires a shift from minimizing losses to securing an absolute net gain of nature and biodiversity. We argue that foundational to this is respecting ecological irreplaceability—the recognition that some ecological assets, such as certain ecosystem types and habitat features upon which species depend, cannot plausibly be restored or replaced within timeframes relevant to the conservation of those ecosystems and species. Despite this ecological reality, many policy settings, particularly around environmental impact assessment and planning, are underpinned by the assumption that lost nature is replaceable. We outline ecological irreplaceability and its implications in the context of nature-positive ambitions. We show how it can be operationalized as the basis of a necessary, fundamental shift in biodiversity policy and conservation decision-making. Embedding the concept in policy is essential to safeguard the potential to achieve nature-positive goals and restore credibility to policy mechanisms that have too often enabled cumulative and irreversible biodiversity loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":157,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Letters","volume":"19 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/con4.70073","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/con4.70073","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Global biodiversity decline has breached safe limits, prompting ambitious goals to halt and reverse nature loss. Meeting these goals requires a shift from minimizing losses to securing an absolute net gain of nature and biodiversity. We argue that foundational to this is respecting ecological irreplaceability—the recognition that some ecological assets, such as certain ecosystem types and habitat features upon which species depend, cannot plausibly be restored or replaced within timeframes relevant to the conservation of those ecosystems and species. Despite this ecological reality, many policy settings, particularly around environmental impact assessment and planning, are underpinned by the assumption that lost nature is replaceable. We outline ecological irreplaceability and its implications in the context of nature-positive ambitions. We show how it can be operationalized as the basis of a necessary, fundamental shift in biodiversity policy and conservation decision-making. Embedding the concept in policy is essential to safeguard the potential to achieve nature-positive goals and restore credibility to policy mechanisms that have too often enabled cumulative and irreversible biodiversity loss.

自然积极时代的生态不可替代性
全球生物多样性的下降已经突破了安全限度,促使人们制定了遏制和扭转自然损失的宏伟目标。实现这些目标需要从尽量减少损失转向确保自然和生物多样性的绝对净收益。我们认为,这样做的基础是尊重生态的不可替代性——认识到某些生态资产,如物种所依赖的某些生态系统类型和栖息地特征,在与保护这些生态系统和物种相关的时间框架内,是无法合理地恢复或取代的。尽管存在这样的生态现实,但许多政策制定,特别是围绕环境影响评估和规划的政策制定,都是基于这样一种假设,即失去的自然是可以替代的。我们概述了生态不可替代性及其在自然积极雄心背景下的含义。我们展示了如何将其作为生物多样性政策和保护决策的必要、根本转变的基础。将这一概念纳入政策,对于维护实现自然积极目标的潜力和恢复政策机制的可信度至关重要,这些政策机制往往导致了累积和不可逆转的生物多样性损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Conservation Letters
Conservation Letters BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
70
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Conservation Letters is a reputable scientific journal that is devoted to the publication of both empirical and theoretical research that has important implications for the conservation of biological diversity. The journal warmly invites submissions from various disciplines within the biological and social sciences, with a particular interest in interdisciplinary work. The primary aim is to advance both pragmatic conservation objectives and scientific knowledge. Manuscripts are subject to a rapid communication schedule, therefore they should address current and relevant topics. Research articles should effectively communicate the significance of their findings in relation to conservation policy and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书