Martine Maron, Michelle Ward, Jeremy S. Simmonds, Brendan A. Wintle, Hugh P. Possingham, Ruben Venegas, Donald Butler, Andrew Macintosh, April E. Reside, Laura Sonter, Daniel C. Dunn, Ailsa Kerswell, Jaana Dielenberg, James E. M. Watson
{"title":"Ecological Irreplaceability in the Era of Nature Positive","authors":"Martine Maron, Michelle Ward, Jeremy S. Simmonds, Brendan A. Wintle, Hugh P. Possingham, Ruben Venegas, Donald Butler, Andrew Macintosh, April E. Reside, Laura Sonter, Daniel C. Dunn, Ailsa Kerswell, Jaana Dielenberg, James E. M. Watson","doi":"10.1111/con4.70073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Global biodiversity decline has breached safe limits, prompting ambitious goals to halt and reverse nature loss. Meeting these goals requires a shift from minimizing losses to securing an absolute net gain of nature and biodiversity. We argue that foundational to this is respecting ecological irreplaceability—the recognition that some ecological assets, such as certain ecosystem types and habitat features upon which species depend, cannot plausibly be restored or replaced within timeframes relevant to the conservation of those ecosystems and species. Despite this ecological reality, many policy settings, particularly around environmental impact assessment and planning, are underpinned by the assumption that lost nature is replaceable. We outline ecological irreplaceability and its implications in the context of nature-positive ambitions. We show how it can be operationalized as the basis of a necessary, fundamental shift in biodiversity policy and conservation decision-making. Embedding the concept in policy is essential to safeguard the potential to achieve nature-positive goals and restore credibility to policy mechanisms that have too often enabled cumulative and irreversible biodiversity loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":157,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Letters","volume":"19 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/con4.70073","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/con4.70073","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Global biodiversity decline has breached safe limits, prompting ambitious goals to halt and reverse nature loss. Meeting these goals requires a shift from minimizing losses to securing an absolute net gain of nature and biodiversity. We argue that foundational to this is respecting ecological irreplaceability—the recognition that some ecological assets, such as certain ecosystem types and habitat features upon which species depend, cannot plausibly be restored or replaced within timeframes relevant to the conservation of those ecosystems and species. Despite this ecological reality, many policy settings, particularly around environmental impact assessment and planning, are underpinned by the assumption that lost nature is replaceable. We outline ecological irreplaceability and its implications in the context of nature-positive ambitions. We show how it can be operationalized as the basis of a necessary, fundamental shift in biodiversity policy and conservation decision-making. Embedding the concept in policy is essential to safeguard the potential to achieve nature-positive goals and restore credibility to policy mechanisms that have too often enabled cumulative and irreversible biodiversity loss.
期刊介绍:
Conservation Letters is a reputable scientific journal that is devoted to the publication of both empirical and theoretical research that has important implications for the conservation of biological diversity. The journal warmly invites submissions from various disciplines within the biological and social sciences, with a particular interest in interdisciplinary work. The primary aim is to advance both pragmatic conservation objectives and scientific knowledge. Manuscripts are subject to a rapid communication schedule, therefore they should address current and relevant topics. Research articles should effectively communicate the significance of their findings in relation to conservation policy and practice.