Programmable shunt valve stability after MRI: a 2-year institutional experience across valve types and field strengths.

IF 1.2
Brannan E O'Neill, Adelaide Pfeuffer, Dallas J Soyland, Sonora Robles, Saige Teti, Kerri B Thorn, Carl J Bailey, Robert Crowder, Amiya Rattley, Abdullah Feroze, Daniel A Donoho, Chima O Oluigbo, John S Myseros, Hasan R Syed, Robert F Keating
{"title":"Programmable shunt valve stability after MRI: a 2-year institutional experience across valve types and field strengths.","authors":"Brannan E O'Neill, Adelaide Pfeuffer, Dallas J Soyland, Sonora Robles, Saige Teti, Kerri B Thorn, Carl J Bailey, Robert Crowder, Amiya Rattley, Abdullah Feroze, Daniel A Donoho, Chima O Oluigbo, John S Myseros, Hasan R Syed, Robert F Keating","doi":"10.1007/s00381-026-07409-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Programmable cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt valves permit noninvasive adjustment of opening pressure but remain vulnerable to inadvertent setting changes when exposed to magnetic fields. This study evaluated the incidence, direction, and clinical significance of MRI-associated setting changes across six contemporary programmable valve models at both 1.5-T and 3-T field strengths.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All brain MRI scans performed between October 2023 and October 2025 in patients with cranially implanted programmable valves at a single tertiary pediatric center were prospectively documented using a standardized pre- and post-MRI valve-check protocol. Valve type, magnet strength, and setting changes were recorded, and statistical analyses incorporated Fisher's exact testing and mixed-effects logistic regression to account for repeated scans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 240 MRI examinations were performed in 87 patients. Overall, 64/240 scans (26.7%) resulted in valve setting changes, with the highest rates occurring in Medtronic Strata valves (28/38, 73.7%), followed by Sophysa Polaris (21/68, 30.9%), Certas Plus (14/115, 12.2%), and proGAV (1/10, 10.0%). No setting changes occurred in Strata MR (0/3) or proGAV 2.0 (0/6) valves. Two valves were non-programmable during assessment. After adjustment for valve type and clustering by patient, magnet strength was not independently associated with valve change. No adverse neurological outcomes occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MRI-related setting changes remain common in certain programmable valves despite newer designs. Brand is the dominant factor, whereas MRI strength alone does not predict risk. Routine pre- and post-MRI valve checks are recommended for all programmable valves.</p>","PeriodicalId":520587,"journal":{"name":"Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-026-07409-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Programmable cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt valves permit noninvasive adjustment of opening pressure but remain vulnerable to inadvertent setting changes when exposed to magnetic fields. This study evaluated the incidence, direction, and clinical significance of MRI-associated setting changes across six contemporary programmable valve models at both 1.5-T and 3-T field strengths.

Methods: All brain MRI scans performed between October 2023 and October 2025 in patients with cranially implanted programmable valves at a single tertiary pediatric center were prospectively documented using a standardized pre- and post-MRI valve-check protocol. Valve type, magnet strength, and setting changes were recorded, and statistical analyses incorporated Fisher's exact testing and mixed-effects logistic regression to account for repeated scans.

Results: A total of 240 MRI examinations were performed in 87 patients. Overall, 64/240 scans (26.7%) resulted in valve setting changes, with the highest rates occurring in Medtronic Strata valves (28/38, 73.7%), followed by Sophysa Polaris (21/68, 30.9%), Certas Plus (14/115, 12.2%), and proGAV (1/10, 10.0%). No setting changes occurred in Strata MR (0/3) or proGAV 2.0 (0/6) valves. Two valves were non-programmable during assessment. After adjustment for valve type and clustering by patient, magnet strength was not independently associated with valve change. No adverse neurological outcomes occurred.

Conclusions: MRI-related setting changes remain common in certain programmable valves despite newer designs. Brand is the dominant factor, whereas MRI strength alone does not predict risk. Routine pre- and post-MRI valve checks are recommended for all programmable valves.

MRI后可编程分流阀的稳定性:2年的机构经验,涉及阀门类型和现场优势。
目的:可编程脑脊液(CSF)分流阀允许无创调节开启压力,但暴露于磁场时仍容易受到无意设置变化的影响。本研究评估了六种现代可编程瓣膜模型在1.5 t和3-T场强下mri相关设置改变的发生率、方向和临床意义。方法:在2023年10月至2025年10月期间,在单一三级儿科中心对颅骨植入可编程瓣膜的患者进行了所有脑MRI扫描,使用标准化的MRI前和MRI后瓣膜检查方案进行前瞻性记录。记录阀门类型、磁铁强度和设置变化,并结合Fisher精确测试和混合效应逻辑回归进行统计分析,以解释重复扫描。结果:87例患者共行MRI检查240次。总体而言,64/240次扫描导致阀门设置改变(26.7%),其中美敦力Strata阀门发生率最高(28/38,73.7%),其次是Sophysa Polaris(21/68, 30.9%)、Certas Plus(14/115, 12.2%)和proGAV(1/10, 10.0%)。Strata MR(0/3)或proGAV 2.0(0/6)阀门没有发生设置变化。两个阀门在评估时是不可编程的。经患者调整瓣膜类型和聚类后,磁铁强度与瓣膜变化不独立相关。未发生不良神经系统预后。结论:mri相关的设置改变在某些可编程阀中仍然很常见,尽管有新的设计。品牌是主要因素,而MRI强度本身并不能预测风险。建议对所有可编程阀门进行常规核磁共振前后阀门检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书