Induced and spontaneous uterine leiomyomas in animal models: a scoping review.

IF 1.3
Acta cirurgica brasileira Pub Date : 2026-08-03 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1590/acb414426
Willane Bandeira de Sousa, João Nogueira Neto, Kauã Manuel Costa Araújo, Lyvia Maria Rodrigues de Sousa Gomes, Maria do Socorro de Sousa Cartagenes, João Batista Santos Garcia
{"title":"Induced and spontaneous uterine leiomyomas in animal models: a scoping review.","authors":"Willane Bandeira de Sousa, João Nogueira Neto, Kauã Manuel Costa Araújo, Lyvia Maria Rodrigues de Sousa Gomes, Maria do Socorro de Sousa Cartagenes, João Batista Santos Garcia","doi":"10.1590/acb414426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To map the experimental models of induced and spontaneous uterine leiomyomas (UL) in animals, describing induction techniques, evaluation methods, advantages, limitations, and research gaps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review of studies published between 2004 and 2024 with in-vivo animal experiments reporting UL induction or spontaneous occurrence. Data were extracted on animal species, sample size, induction methods, confirmation techniques, and reported advantages or disadvantages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 56 studies were included. Rats and mice were the most frequently used species. Induction methods comprised hormonal administration, genetic predisposition, chemical exposure (monosodium glutamate), ischemic injury, external stimulation, cell transplantation, xenotransplantation, and spontaneous development. A critical finding that emerged was that 60.7% of the studies failed to report confirmation of UL induction. Among the 22 studies that reported confirmation, caliper measurement was the most frequently used technique. This widespread lack of methodological rigor significantly undermines the credibility and reproducibility of many published models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This scoping review highlights not only the heterogeneity of UL animal models and the lack of standardized induction and evaluation protocols, but also identifies a critical gap in induction validation reporting that compromises the foundation of preclinical research in this field.</p>","PeriodicalId":93850,"journal":{"name":"Acta cirurgica brasileira","volume":"41 ","pages":"e414426"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13432877/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta cirurgica brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/acb414426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To map the experimental models of induced and spontaneous uterine leiomyomas (UL) in animals, describing induction techniques, evaluation methods, advantages, limitations, and research gaps.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review of studies published between 2004 and 2024 with in-vivo animal experiments reporting UL induction or spontaneous occurrence. Data were extracted on animal species, sample size, induction methods, confirmation techniques, and reported advantages or disadvantages.

Results: A total of 56 studies were included. Rats and mice were the most frequently used species. Induction methods comprised hormonal administration, genetic predisposition, chemical exposure (monosodium glutamate), ischemic injury, external stimulation, cell transplantation, xenotransplantation, and spontaneous development. A critical finding that emerged was that 60.7% of the studies failed to report confirmation of UL induction. Among the 22 studies that reported confirmation, caliper measurement was the most frequently used technique. This widespread lack of methodological rigor significantly undermines the credibility and reproducibility of many published models.

Conclusion: This scoping review highlights not only the heterogeneity of UL animal models and the lack of standardized induction and evaluation protocols, but also identifies a critical gap in induction validation reporting that compromises the foundation of preclinical research in this field.

动物模型诱导和自发子宫平滑肌瘤:范围综述。
目的:绘制动物诱导性和自发性子宫平滑肌瘤(UL)的实验模型,描述诱导技术、评价方法、优势、局限性和研究空白。方法:我们对2004年至2024年间发表的体内动物实验报告UL诱导或自发发生的研究进行了系统回顾。从动物种类、样本量、诱导方法、确认技术以及报告的优缺点等方面提取数据。结果:共纳入56项研究。大鼠和小鼠是最常用的物种。诱导方法包括激素管理、遗传易感性、化学暴露(谷氨酸钠)、缺血性损伤、外部刺激、细胞移植、异种移植和自发发育。出现的一个关键发现是,60.7%的研究未能报告确认UL诱导。在报告证实的22项研究中,卡尺测量是最常用的技术。这种普遍缺乏严谨的方法严重破坏了许多已发表模型的可信度和可重复性。结论:这项范围综述不仅突出了UL动物模型的异质性和缺乏标准化的诱导和评估方案,而且还发现了诱导验证报告中的一个关键空白,这危及了该领域临床前研究的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书