Hydrodissection and hydrodilatation for joint pain: a scoping review.

IF 2.5 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) Pub Date : 2026-07-23 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpain.2026.1851291
Benjamin Leahy, Harry McGrath, Dominic Harmon
{"title":"Hydrodissection and hydrodilatation for joint pain: a scoping review.","authors":"Benjamin Leahy, Harry McGrath, Dominic Harmon","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2026.1851291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the current evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided hydrodissection (US-HD) in the management of joint-related pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was conducted for studies published in the past 15 years. Eligible studies included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, and case series investigating hydrodissection for joint pain (e.g., shoulder, hip, knee, sacroiliac joint). Outcomes included pain reduction, functional improvement, and complication rates. Data extraction and qualitative synthesis were performed due to heterogeneity in study design and outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 138 studies were identified, of which 21 met inclusion criteria. Evidence suggests that US-HD may provide significant pain relief and functional improvement in conditions such as adhesive capsulitis, greater trochanteric pain syndrome, and knee osteoarthritis. Studies consistently reported low complication rates. However, heterogeneity in technique, injectate composition, and outcome measures was noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultrasound-guided hydrodissection appears to be a safe and promising intervention for joint-related pain. While early evidence is encouraging, larger high-quality trials are required to establish standardised protocols and confirm long-term efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":73097,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":"7 ","pages":"1851291"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13443037/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2026.1851291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the current evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided hydrodissection (US-HD) in the management of joint-related pain.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was conducted for studies published in the past 15 years. Eligible studies included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, and case series investigating hydrodissection for joint pain (e.g., shoulder, hip, knee, sacroiliac joint). Outcomes included pain reduction, functional improvement, and complication rates. Data extraction and qualitative synthesis were performed due to heterogeneity in study design and outcome measures.

Results: A total of 138 studies were identified, of which 21 met inclusion criteria. Evidence suggests that US-HD may provide significant pain relief and functional improvement in conditions such as adhesive capsulitis, greater trochanteric pain syndrome, and knee osteoarthritis. Studies consistently reported low complication rates. However, heterogeneity in technique, injectate composition, and outcome measures was noted.

Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided hydrodissection appears to be a safe and promising intervention for joint-related pain. While early evidence is encouraging, larger high-quality trials are required to establish standardised protocols and confirm long-term efficacy.

关节疼痛的水分离和水扩张:范围审查。
目的:评价超声引导下水解剖术(US-HD)治疗关节相关疼痛的有效性和安全性。方法:系统检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library和谷歌Scholar,检索近15年发表的研究。符合条件的研究包括随机对照试验(RCTs)、队列研究和调查关节疼痛(如肩、髋、膝、骶髂关节)的水解剖病例系列。结果包括疼痛减轻、功能改善和并发症发生率。由于研究设计和结果测量的异质性,进行了数据提取和定性综合。结果:共纳入138项研究,其中21项符合纳入标准。有证据表明,US-HD可能对粘连性囊炎、大转子疼痛综合征和膝关节骨关节炎等疾病提供显著的疼痛缓解和功能改善。研究一致报告低并发症发生率。然而,注意到技术、注射剂组成和结果测量的异质性。结论:超声引导下的水解剖似乎是一种安全且有希望的关节相关疼痛干预措施。虽然早期证据令人鼓舞,但需要更大规模的高质量试验来建立标准化方案并确认长期疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书