{"title":"Endometrial thickness evaluation with ultrasonography assessment among normal and endometrial cancer across multi-ethnic Indonesian women.","authors":"Andi Darma Putra, Aldi Tamara Rahman, Naufal Syafiq Darmawan, Lasmini Syariatin, Firda Puspita","doi":"10.3389/frph.2026.1826142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endometrial thickness is a crucial indicator for reproductive health evaluation and initial detection of abnormalities. This study aims to comprehensively characterize and evaluate the endometrium in normal and cancer of Indonesian women using ultrasonography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective investigation analyzed ultrasound data from three hospitals during 2021-2024 in women who met predefined inclusion criteria. Subjects were classified according to age, ethnicity, menopausal status, and ultrasound-based examination category.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>Endometrial thickness was quantified in 170 women with normal gynecological result and 82 women with histopathologically confirmed endometrial cancer. The average age of the normal group was 40.63 ± 0.91 years while the cancer group had an average age of 52.28 ± 1.33 years, significantly indicating that cancer subjects were generally of greater age. Endometrial thickness significantly decreased with advancing age, with the reduces values in women over 50 years (post-menopausal). There was a significant difference in endometrial thickness between normal and cancer cases, with optimal diagnostic cut-off values of 12.85 mm (AUC 0.89, sensitivity 0.83, specificity 0.94) for women aged ≤50 years and 10.20 mm (AUC 0.99, sensitivity 0.97, specificity 1.00) for women aged >50 years. These results underscore the robust relationship between age, menopausal status, and endometrial pathology, and support the clinical utility of ultrasound as a non-invasive method for early detection and risk profiling of endometrial abnormalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":73103,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in reproductive health","volume":"8 ","pages":"1826142"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13443303/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in reproductive health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2026.1826142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Endometrial thickness is a crucial indicator for reproductive health evaluation and initial detection of abnormalities. This study aims to comprehensively characterize and evaluate the endometrium in normal and cancer of Indonesian women using ultrasonography.
Methods: This retrospective investigation analyzed ultrasound data from three hospitals during 2021-2024 in women who met predefined inclusion criteria. Subjects were classified according to age, ethnicity, menopausal status, and ultrasound-based examination category.
Results and discussion: Endometrial thickness was quantified in 170 women with normal gynecological result and 82 women with histopathologically confirmed endometrial cancer. The average age of the normal group was 40.63 ± 0.91 years while the cancer group had an average age of 52.28 ± 1.33 years, significantly indicating that cancer subjects were generally of greater age. Endometrial thickness significantly decreased with advancing age, with the reduces values in women over 50 years (post-menopausal). There was a significant difference in endometrial thickness between normal and cancer cases, with optimal diagnostic cut-off values of 12.85 mm (AUC 0.89, sensitivity 0.83, specificity 0.94) for women aged ≤50 years and 10.20 mm (AUC 0.99, sensitivity 0.97, specificity 1.00) for women aged >50 years. These results underscore the robust relationship between age, menopausal status, and endometrial pathology, and support the clinical utility of ultrasound as a non-invasive method for early detection and risk profiling of endometrial abnormalities.
子宫内膜厚度是评价生殖健康和初步发现异常的重要指标。本研究旨在利用超声技术全面表征和评价印尼女性正常和癌子宫内膜。方法:本回顾性调查分析了三家医院2021-2024年期间符合预定纳入标准的妇女的超声数据。受试者根据年龄、种族、绝经状态和超声检查类别进行分类。结果与讨论:对170例妇科检查结果正常的妇女和82例组织病理学证实的子宫内膜癌妇女进行子宫内膜厚度量化。正常组的平均年龄为40.63±0.91岁,而癌症组的平均年龄为52.28±1.33岁,明显表明癌症受试者年龄普遍偏大。随着年龄的增长,子宫内膜厚度显著下降,尤其是50岁以上(绝经后)的女性。正常和癌患者的子宫内膜厚度有显著差异,≤50岁女性的最佳诊断临界值为12.85 mm (AUC 0.89,敏感性0.83,特异性0.94),而≤50岁女性的最佳诊断临界值为10.20 mm (AUC 0.99,敏感性0.97,特异性1.00)。这些结果强调了年龄、绝经状态和子宫内膜病理之间的牢固关系,并支持超声作为子宫内膜异常早期检测和风险分析的非侵入性方法的临床应用。