Accuracy of tympanometry cutoff points in children from Central-Western Brazil.

IF 0.9 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
CoDAS Pub Date : 2026-08-03 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1590/2317-1782/e20250100en
Cláudia Cruvinel Câmara, Melissa Ameloti Gomes Avelino, Paulo Sergio Sucasas da Costa, Alexandre Siqueira Guedes Coelho, Maria Claret Costa Monteiro Hadler
{"title":"Accuracy of tympanometry cutoff points in children from Central-Western Brazil.","authors":"Cláudia Cruvinel Câmara, Melissa Ameloti Gomes Avelino, Paulo Sergio Sucasas da Costa, Alexandre Siqueira Guedes Coelho, Maria Claret Costa Monteiro Hadler","doi":"10.1590/2317-1782/e20250100en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated tympanometric cutoff points (tympanometric peak pressure and static compliance) for transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) and determined their diagnostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This analytical study, based on a randomized clinical trial, included 84 children (6-42 months; median 24 months) from public childcare centers in Brazil. Associations between cutoff points and TEOAEs were verified by Fisher's exact test and Chi-square. Kappa assessed agreement between ears, and the correlation between tympanometric peak pressure and static compliance was analyzed by Spearman. Diagnostic accuracy was determined using ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curves and confirmed with EpiDat 3.1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the 84 children, 66 right ears and 73 left ears were examined; however, 42 ears were randomly selected from each side for the final analysis. A significant correlation was found between peak pressure and static compliance. ROC analysis identified -180 daPa as the most accurate cutoff (AUC = 0.781; 95% CI: 0.656-0.905; p < 0.001). EpiDat indicated a specificity of 93.9%, a sensitivity of 55.6%, and an overall accuracy of 85.7%. Static compliance <0.2 mL showed comparable performance (specificity = 98.5%, sensitivity = 50.0%, accuracy = 88.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cutoff point of -180 daPa combined with static compliance <0.2 mL improved screening accuracy and reduced unnecessary referrals. It provided the best balance between specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy, aligning more closely with TEOAEs results and supporting updating this tympanometric criterion in infant hearing screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":46547,"journal":{"name":"CoDAS","volume":"38 5","pages":"e20250100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13445989/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CoDAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/e20250100en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated tympanometric cutoff points (tympanometric peak pressure and static compliance) for transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) and determined their diagnostic accuracy.

Methods: This analytical study, based on a randomized clinical trial, included 84 children (6-42 months; median 24 months) from public childcare centers in Brazil. Associations between cutoff points and TEOAEs were verified by Fisher's exact test and Chi-square. Kappa assessed agreement between ears, and the correlation between tympanometric peak pressure and static compliance was analyzed by Spearman. Diagnostic accuracy was determined using ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curves and confirmed with EpiDat 3.1.

Results: In the 84 children, 66 right ears and 73 left ears were examined; however, 42 ears were randomly selected from each side for the final analysis. A significant correlation was found between peak pressure and static compliance. ROC analysis identified -180 daPa as the most accurate cutoff (AUC = 0.781; 95% CI: 0.656-0.905; p < 0.001). EpiDat indicated a specificity of 93.9%, a sensitivity of 55.6%, and an overall accuracy of 85.7%. Static compliance <0.2 mL showed comparable performance (specificity = 98.5%, sensitivity = 50.0%, accuracy = 88.1%).

Conclusion: The cutoff point of -180 daPa combined with static compliance <0.2 mL improved screening accuracy and reduced unnecessary referrals. It provided the best balance between specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy, aligning more closely with TEOAEs results and supporting updating this tympanometric criterion in infant hearing screening.

巴西中西部儿童鼓室测量分界点的准确性。
目的:本研究评估瞬时诱发耳声发射(teoae)的鼓室测量截止点(鼓室测量峰值压力和静态顺应性),并确定其诊断准确性。方法:本分析性研究基于一项随机临床试验,包括84名来自巴西公共托儿中心的儿童(6-42个月,中位24个月)。截断点与teoae之间的关联通过Fisher精确检验和卡方检验验证。Kappa评估耳朵之间的一致性,Spearman分析鼓室峰值压力与静态顺应性之间的相关性。采用ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic)曲线确定诊断的准确性,并用EpiDat 3.1进行验证。结果:84例患儿中检查右耳66耳,左耳73耳;然而,从每侧随机抽取42只耳朵进行最终分析。峰值压力和静态顺应性之间存在显著的相关性。ROC分析确定-180 daPa为最准确的截止点(AUC = 0.781; 95% CI: 0.656-0.905; p < 0.001)。EpiDat特异性为93.9%,敏感性为55.6%,总体准确性为85.7%。结论:- 180dapa合并静态顺应性的截止点
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CoDAS
CoDAS AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
103
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书