Liyan Yu, Dan Liu, Jonathan M Payne, Heather L Thompson, Xian Wu, Julia Moreira, Lauren Morey, Michael Peper, Hannah Iroff, Benjamin F Mujica, Yang Hou
{"title":"Oral Language Skills of Children and Adolescents with Neurofibromatosis Type 1: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Liyan Yu, Dan Liu, Jonathan M Payne, Heather L Thompson, Xian Wu, Julia Moreira, Lauren Morey, Michael Peper, Hannah Iroff, Benjamin F Mujica, Yang Hou","doi":"10.1007/s11065-026-09698-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This meta-analysis aimed to robustly estimate mean differences in oral language skills between children and adolescents with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and the general population, and to examine potential moderators contributing to variability in these group differences. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across Scopus, PsycINFO, Web of Science, PubMed, and ProQuest on March 31, 2025, yielding 2,531 records. Among them, 44 studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 2,479 individuals with NF1 (45.10% female; M<sub>age</sub> = 8.58 years, SD = 3.81). Results showed that individuals with NF1 performed significantly lower than controls in overall oral language skills (n = 45, k = 131, g = -0.66, 95% CI [-0.78, -0.54], I<sup>2</sup> = 82.91%), as well as in all subdomains including core language skills (g = -0.79, 95% CI [-0.99, -0.58]), expressive language (g = -0.63, 95% CI [-0.80, -0.47]), receptive language (g = -0.59, 95% CI [-0.79, -0.39]), and phonological awareness (g = -0.68, 95% CI [-0.86, -0.51]). These group differences remained consistent across studies that vary in sample mean age, sex composition, NF1 inheritance mode, ADHD or learning disorder diagnosis, intelligence, working memory, comparison group type, sampling resources, and measures. The findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to improve oral language skills among individuals with NF1 and emphasize the importance of exploring underlying factors using individual-level data and large representative samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":49754,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychology Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-026-09698-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This meta-analysis aimed to robustly estimate mean differences in oral language skills between children and adolescents with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and the general population, and to examine potential moderators contributing to variability in these group differences. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across Scopus, PsycINFO, Web of Science, PubMed, and ProQuest on March 31, 2025, yielding 2,531 records. Among them, 44 studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 2,479 individuals with NF1 (45.10% female; Mage = 8.58 years, SD = 3.81). Results showed that individuals with NF1 performed significantly lower than controls in overall oral language skills (n = 45, k = 131, g = -0.66, 95% CI [-0.78, -0.54], I2 = 82.91%), as well as in all subdomains including core language skills (g = -0.79, 95% CI [-0.99, -0.58]), expressive language (g = -0.63, 95% CI [-0.80, -0.47]), receptive language (g = -0.59, 95% CI [-0.79, -0.39]), and phonological awareness (g = -0.68, 95% CI [-0.86, -0.51]). These group differences remained consistent across studies that vary in sample mean age, sex composition, NF1 inheritance mode, ADHD or learning disorder diagnosis, intelligence, working memory, comparison group type, sampling resources, and measures. The findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to improve oral language skills among individuals with NF1 and emphasize the importance of exploring underlying factors using individual-level data and large representative samples.
期刊介绍:
Neuropsychology Review is a quarterly, refereed publication devoted to integrative review papers on substantive content areas in neuropsychology, with particular focus on populations with endogenous or acquired conditions affecting brain and function and on translational research providing a mechanistic understanding of clinical problems. Publication of new data is not the purview of the journal. Articles are written by international specialists in the field, discussing such complex issues as distinctive functional features of central nervous system disease and injury; challenges in early diagnosis; the impact of genes and environment on function; risk factors for functional impairment; treatment efficacy of neuropsychological rehabilitation; the role of neuroimaging, neuroelectrophysiology, and other neurometric modalities in explicating function; clinical trial design; neuropsychological function and its substrates characteristic of normal development and aging; and neuropsychological dysfunction and its substrates in neurological, psychiatric, and medical conditions. The journal''s broad perspective is supported by an outstanding, multidisciplinary editorial review board guided by the aim to provide students and professionals, clinicians and researchers with scholarly articles that critically and objectively summarize and synthesize the strengths and weaknesses in the literature and propose novel hypotheses, methods of analysis, and links to other fields.