Scenario validation for skills training through urinary catheterisation simulation in neonates: a methodological study.

IF 2.1 Q2 NURSING
Márcia Andréia da Conceição de Jesus, Cristianne Teixeira Carneiro, Georje de Neiva Pereira, Thiago Gonçalves Mangueira, Karinne Vieira de Carvalho, Ruth Cardoso Rocha, José Cláudio Garcia Lira Neto, Mychelangela de Assis Brito, Maria Augusta Rocha Bezerra
{"title":"Scenario validation for skills training through urinary catheterisation simulation in neonates: a methodological study.","authors":"Márcia Andréia da Conceição de Jesus, Cristianne Teixeira Carneiro, Georje de Neiva Pereira, Thiago Gonçalves Mangueira, Karinne Vieira de Carvalho, Ruth Cardoso Rocha, José Cláudio Garcia Lira Neto, Mychelangela de Assis Brito, Maria Augusta Rocha Bezerra","doi":"10.1177/17449871261456617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Simulation-based training supports the development of technical and non-technical nursing skills, promoting safe learning for complex neonatal procedures.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To validate a simulation-based scenario for skills training in indwelling urinary catheterisation in male neonates.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A methodological study conducted between May 2023 and February 2024, structured into five stages: overview, scenario development, scenario progression design, debriefing and assessment. Content validation was performed by 11 experts, and a pilot test was carried out with six nursing students. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and the Content Validation Index (CVI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The scenario and verification checklist showed excellent content validity, with CVI values exceeding 0.90 for all items. Sixty suggested revisions resulted in improvements, including adjustment of briefing and debriefing time, inclusion of laboratory tests and neonatal pain indicators, simulation in pairs and removal of non-recommended procedural steps. In the pilot test, students demonstrated increased learning outcomes, with theoretical knowledge improving by 15.0% and practical skills by 22.5% after participating in the simulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The scenario was validated and demonstrated applicability as an educational tool for developing skills in neonatal indwelling urinary catheterisation, supporting safer and more standardised nursing practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":47172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"17449871261456617"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13442688/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17449871261456617","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Simulation-based training supports the development of technical and non-technical nursing skills, promoting safe learning for complex neonatal procedures.

Aim: To validate a simulation-based scenario for skills training in indwelling urinary catheterisation in male neonates.

Method: A methodological study conducted between May 2023 and February 2024, structured into five stages: overview, scenario development, scenario progression design, debriefing and assessment. Content validation was performed by 11 experts, and a pilot test was carried out with six nursing students. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and the Content Validation Index (CVI).

Results: The scenario and verification checklist showed excellent content validity, with CVI values exceeding 0.90 for all items. Sixty suggested revisions resulted in improvements, including adjustment of briefing and debriefing time, inclusion of laboratory tests and neonatal pain indicators, simulation in pairs and removal of non-recommended procedural steps. In the pilot test, students demonstrated increased learning outcomes, with theoretical knowledge improving by 15.0% and practical skills by 22.5% after participating in the simulation.

Conclusions: The scenario was validated and demonstrated applicability as an educational tool for developing skills in neonatal indwelling urinary catheterisation, supporting safer and more standardised nursing practice.

新生儿导尿模拟技能训练的情景验证:一项方法学研究。
基于模拟的培训支持技术和非技术护理技能的发展,促进复杂新生儿手术的安全学习。目的:验证男性新生儿留置导尿技能培训的模拟情景。方法:在2023年5月至2024年2月期间进行方法学研究,分为五个阶段:概述、情景开发、情景递进设计、汇报和评估。11位专家进行了内容验证,6名护生进行了中试。数据分析采用描述性统计和内容验证指数(CVI)。结果:情景和验证表内容效度良好,所有项目的CVI值均超过0.90。60项修订建议产生了改进,包括调整简报和汇报时间、纳入实验室检查和新生儿疼痛指标、成对模拟和取消非建议的程序步骤。在试点测试中,学生的学习效果有所提高,参与模拟后,理论知识提高了15.0%,实践技能提高了22.5%。结论:该情景得到了验证,并证明了作为发展新生儿留置导尿技能的教育工具的适用性,支持更安全和更标准化的护理实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: The Journal of Research in Nursing is a leading peer reviewed journal that blends good research with contemporary debates about policy and practice. The Journal of Research in Nursing contributes knowledge to nursing practice, research and local, national and international health and social care policy. Each issue contains a variety of papers and review commentaries within a specific theme. The editors are advised and supported by a board of key academics, practitioners and policy makers of international standing. The Journal of Research in Nursing will: • Ensure an evidence base to your practice and policy development • Inform your research work at an advanced level • Challenge you to critically reflect on the interface between practice, policy and research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书