The usefulness of a simultaneous immunoassay for hepatitis C virus antigen-antibody using the ELECSYS HCV Duo assay.

IF 2.1 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hepatology Forum Pub Date : 2026-04-14 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.14744/hf.2025.27743
Keisuke Amano, Tomoya Sano, Tatsuya Ide, Dan Nakano, Shigemune Bekki, Teruko Arinaga-Hino, Takumi Kawaguchi
{"title":"The usefulness of a simultaneous immunoassay for hepatitis C virus antigen-antibody using the ELECSYS HCV Duo assay.","authors":"Keisuke Amano, Tomoya Sano, Tatsuya Ide, Dan Nakano, Shigemune Bekki, Teruko Arinaga-Hino, Takumi Kawaguchi","doi":"10.14744/hf.2025.27743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>The World Health Organization has a goal to eliminate the hepatitis C virus (HCV) by 2030. To achieve this, effective screening for HCV is essential. We evaluated the utility of the ELECSYS® HCV Duo immunoassay (Duo assay) for HCV screening.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective study included 184 HCV patients from 2014 to 2017. We measured HCV antibody (Duo/Ab) and HCV core antigen (Duo/cAg) using the Duo assay in HCV RNA-positive samples obtained before DAA therapy. We compared Duo/cAg positivity rates according to host and viral factors. We also performed logistic regression analysis and decision tree analysis to identify independent factors and profiles for Duo/cAg false-negative results, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Duo/Ab positivity rates were 100%, and Duo/cAg positivity rates were 78% in all subjects. Duo/cAg positivity rates were 40.0%, 78.6%, and 92.9% at HCV RNA levels ≤4.9, 5.0-5.9, and ≥6.0 log IU/mL, respectively (p<0.0001). There were no significant differences in Duo/cAg positivity rates by gender, age, body mass index, ALT >30 U/L, and HCV genotype. In multivariate analysis, the HCV RNA level (Unit -1.0 log IU/mL, OR 5.49, CI 3.12-10.56, p<0.0001) was the only independent factor associated with Duo/cAg false-negative results. Decision tree analysis revealed that HCV RNA ≥5.7 log IU/mL was the profile associated with the lowest false-negative rate (7.4%). In contrast, HCV RNA <4.4 log IU/mL was the profile associated with the highest false-negative rate (100%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Duo assay identified approximately 80% of HCV carriers without HCV RNA measurement, regardless of patient background, providing substantial clinical, economic, and time-saving benefits. However, clinicians should be aware of limitations in patients with low HCV RNA levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":29722,"journal":{"name":"Hepatology Forum","volume":"7 2","pages":"118-124"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13442722/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatology Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/hf.2025.27743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: The World Health Organization has a goal to eliminate the hepatitis C virus (HCV) by 2030. To achieve this, effective screening for HCV is essential. We evaluated the utility of the ELECSYS® HCV Duo immunoassay (Duo assay) for HCV screening.

Materials and methods: This single-center retrospective study included 184 HCV patients from 2014 to 2017. We measured HCV antibody (Duo/Ab) and HCV core antigen (Duo/cAg) using the Duo assay in HCV RNA-positive samples obtained before DAA therapy. We compared Duo/cAg positivity rates according to host and viral factors. We also performed logistic regression analysis and decision tree analysis to identify independent factors and profiles for Duo/cAg false-negative results, respectively.

Results: Duo/Ab positivity rates were 100%, and Duo/cAg positivity rates were 78% in all subjects. Duo/cAg positivity rates were 40.0%, 78.6%, and 92.9% at HCV RNA levels ≤4.9, 5.0-5.9, and ≥6.0 log IU/mL, respectively (p<0.0001). There were no significant differences in Duo/cAg positivity rates by gender, age, body mass index, ALT >30 U/L, and HCV genotype. In multivariate analysis, the HCV RNA level (Unit -1.0 log IU/mL, OR 5.49, CI 3.12-10.56, p<0.0001) was the only independent factor associated with Duo/cAg false-negative results. Decision tree analysis revealed that HCV RNA ≥5.7 log IU/mL was the profile associated with the lowest false-negative rate (7.4%). In contrast, HCV RNA <4.4 log IU/mL was the profile associated with the highest false-negative rate (100%).

Conclusion: The Duo assay identified approximately 80% of HCV carriers without HCV RNA measurement, regardless of patient background, providing substantial clinical, economic, and time-saving benefits. However, clinicians should be aware of limitations in patients with low HCV RNA levels.

使用ELECSYS HCV Duo法同时免疫测定丙型肝炎病毒抗原抗体的有效性
背景和目的:世界卫生组织的目标是到2030年消除丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)。为实现这一目标,有效筛查丙型肝炎病毒至关重要。我们评估了ELECSYS®HCV Duo免疫分析法(Duo assay)在HCV筛查中的效用。材料和方法:本单中心回顾性研究纳入2014 - 2017年184例HCV患者。在DAA治疗前获得的HCV rna阳性样本中,我们使用Duo法检测HCV抗体(Duo/Ab)和HCV核心抗原(Duo/cAg)。根据宿主和病毒因素比较Duo/cAg阳性率。我们还分别进行了逻辑回归分析和决策树分析,以确定Duo/cAg假阴性结果的独立因素和特征。结果:所有受试者Duo/Ab阳性率为100%,Duo/cAg阳性率为78%。HCV RNA水平≤4.9、5.0-5.9和≥6.0 log IU/mL时,HCV基因型的Duo/cAg阳性率分别为40.0%、78.6%和92.9% (p30 U/L)。在多变量分析中,HCV RNA水平(单位-1.0 log IU/mL, OR 5.49, CI 3.12-10.56, p)结论:无论患者背景如何,Duo检测方法可以识别出大约80%的HCV携带者,无需检测HCV RNA,提供了大量的临床、经济和节省时间的好处。然而,临床医生应该意识到低HCV RNA水平患者的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书