Social exchange theory tenets and the employment of persons with disabilities in the Western Cape, South Africa.

IF 1.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
African Journal of Disability Pub Date : 2026-07-15 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.4102/ajod.v15i0.1976
Warren P Charles, Tendency Beretu
{"title":"Social exchange theory tenets and the employment of persons with disabilities in the Western Cape, South Africa.","authors":"Warren P Charles, Tendency Beretu","doi":"10.4102/ajod.v15i0.1976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Employment of persons with disabilities (PWDs) in South Africa's public sector remains persistently low despite progressive legislative frameworks. This reflects enduring structural, organisational and attitudinal barriers that limit meaningful inclusion, particularly at a provincial level. Compliance-driven approaches have proven insufficient in addressing the organisational dynamics shaping inclusion. This study is grounded in the social model of disability and applies social exchange theory (SET) to examine how perceptions of costs, benefits and reciprocity influence employment decisions.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study applied SET to: (1) understand perceived costs/benefits of employing PWDs; (2) explore the role of social structures/actors; (3) propose SET-informed strategies to enhance equity.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A qualitative study, situated within the transformative paradigm and using a case study design, was conducted in the Western Cape provincial public service. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 10 senior officials and analysed thematically using key SET principles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three interrelated themes emerged: the importance of enabling structures and actors, the role of reinforcement in sustaining inclusive practices, and the significance of reciprocal professional relationships. Findings indicate that inclusion is constrained by perceived costs and limited institutional support, but can be strengthened through structural investment, incentive mechanisms and relational engagement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Social exchange theory provides a robust framework for reconceptualising PWD employment as a mutually beneficial social exchange, guiding more sustainable, relational inclusion strategies.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>The study advances SET as a practical lens for designing interventions that address both structural and relational barriers to disability inclusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":45606,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Disability","volume":"15 ","pages":"1976"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13443599/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Disability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v15i0.1976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Employment of persons with disabilities (PWDs) in South Africa's public sector remains persistently low despite progressive legislative frameworks. This reflects enduring structural, organisational and attitudinal barriers that limit meaningful inclusion, particularly at a provincial level. Compliance-driven approaches have proven insufficient in addressing the organisational dynamics shaping inclusion. This study is grounded in the social model of disability and applies social exchange theory (SET) to examine how perceptions of costs, benefits and reciprocity influence employment decisions.

Objectives: This study applied SET to: (1) understand perceived costs/benefits of employing PWDs; (2) explore the role of social structures/actors; (3) propose SET-informed strategies to enhance equity.

Method: A qualitative study, situated within the transformative paradigm and using a case study design, was conducted in the Western Cape provincial public service. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 10 senior officials and analysed thematically using key SET principles.

Results: Three interrelated themes emerged: the importance of enabling structures and actors, the role of reinforcement in sustaining inclusive practices, and the significance of reciprocal professional relationships. Findings indicate that inclusion is constrained by perceived costs and limited institutional support, but can be strengthened through structural investment, incentive mechanisms and relational engagement.

Conclusion: Social exchange theory provides a robust framework for reconceptualising PWD employment as a mutually beneficial social exchange, guiding more sustainable, relational inclusion strategies.

Contribution: The study advances SET as a practical lens for designing interventions that address both structural and relational barriers to disability inclusion.

社会交换理论原则与南非西开普省残疾人就业。
背景:尽管立法框架取得了进步,但南非公共部门的残疾人就业率仍然很低。这反映了长期存在的结构性、组织性和态度上的障碍,这些障碍限制了有意义的包容,尤其是在省级层面。事实证明,合规性驱动的方法不足以解决塑造包容性的组织动态。本研究以残疾的社会模型为基础,运用社会交换理论(SET)来研究成本、收益和互惠的感知如何影响就业决策。目的:本研究将SET应用于:(1)了解雇用残疾人士的感知成本/收益;(2)探索社会结构/行动者的作用;(3)提出SET-informed战略以提高公平性。方法:定性研究,位于转型范式和使用案例研究设计,在西开普省公共服务进行。通过与10名高级官员的半结构化访谈收集数据,并使用关键的SET原则进行主题分析。结果:出现了三个相互关联的主题:扶持结构和行动者的重要性,强化在维持包容性实践中的作用,以及互惠专业关系的重要性。研究结果表明,包容性受到感知成本和有限的制度支持的制约,但可以通过结构性投资、激励机制和关系参与来加强。结论:社会交换理论为将残疾人就业重新定义为一种互利的社会交换提供了一个强有力的框架,指导更可持续的关系包容战略。贡献:该研究将SET作为设计干预措施的实用视角,以解决残疾包容的结构性和关系障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
African Journal of Disability
African Journal of Disability HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
50
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The African Journal of Disability, the official journal of CRS, AfriNEAD and CEDRES, introduce and discuss issues and experiences relating to and supporting the act of better understanding the interfaces between disability, poverty and practices of exclusion and marginalisation. Its articles yield new insight into established human development practices, evaluate new educational techniques and disability research, examine current cultural and social discrimination, and bring serious critical analysis to bear on problems shared across the African continent. Emphasis is on all aspects of disability particularity in the developing African context. This includes, amongst others: -disability studies as an emerging field of public health enquiry -rehabilitation, including vocational and community-based rehabilitation -community development and medical issues related to disability and poverty -disability-related stigma and discrimination -inclusive education -legal, policy, human rights and advocacy issues related to disability -the role of arts and media in relation to disability -disability as part of global Sustainable Development Goals transformation agendas -disability and postcolonial issues -globalisation and cultural change in relation to disability -environmental and climate-related issues linked to disability -disability, diversity and intersections of identity -disability and the promotion of human development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书