Effectiveness of an educational intervention on intensive care nurses' knowledge and practice of endotracheal suctioning: a single-group pretest-posttest study.

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Imran Inayat Yousafzai, Ihsanur Rahman, Bakhtyar Ali Shah
{"title":"Effectiveness of an educational intervention on intensive care nurses' knowledge and practice of endotracheal suctioning: a single-group pretest-posttest study.","authors":"Imran Inayat Yousafzai, Ihsanur Rahman, Bakhtyar Ali Shah","doi":"10.1186/s12912-026-05049-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endotracheal tube (ETT) suctioning is a critical nursing procedure essential for airway management in mechanically ventilated patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). Proper suctioning practices help reduce complications, including ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). However, evidence suggests that ICU nurses' knowledge and practices regarding ETT suctioning remain suboptimal. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of an educational intervention on ICU nurses' knowledge and practices regarding ETT suctioning.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A quasi-experimental single-group pretest-posttest study was conducted in the intensive care units (ICUs) of three public sector tertiary care hospitals in Peshawar, Pakistan. Eligible ICU nurses who met the inclusion criteria and consented to participate were recruited using convenience sampling (n = 60). Knowledge and practice were assessed before and after the educational intervention using a structured knowledge questionnaire and an observational practice checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nurses' knowledge scores improved significantly following the intervention (pre-intervention: 6.57 ± 1.79 vs. post-intervention: 10.23 ± 1.68; mean difference = 3.66; p < 0.001), with a very large effect size (Cohen's d = 2.12). Practice scores also increased significantly from 12.65 ± 1.83 to 16.38 ± 1.43 (mean difference = 3.73; p < 0.001), corresponding to a very large effect size (Cohen's d = 2.27).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The educational intervention was associated with substantial improvements in ICU nurses' knowledge and practices regarding endotracheal suctioning. However, because this study employed a single-group pretest-posttest design without a control group, the findings should be interpreted with caution, as causal relationships cannot be established. Regular in-service education is recommended to maintain competency and promote adherence to evidence-based endotracheal suctioning practices.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13449507/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-026-05049-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endotracheal tube (ETT) suctioning is a critical nursing procedure essential for airway management in mechanically ventilated patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). Proper suctioning practices help reduce complications, including ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). However, evidence suggests that ICU nurses' knowledge and practices regarding ETT suctioning remain suboptimal. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of an educational intervention on ICU nurses' knowledge and practices regarding ETT suctioning.

Methodology: A quasi-experimental single-group pretest-posttest study was conducted in the intensive care units (ICUs) of three public sector tertiary care hospitals in Peshawar, Pakistan. Eligible ICU nurses who met the inclusion criteria and consented to participate were recruited using convenience sampling (n = 60). Knowledge and practice were assessed before and after the educational intervention using a structured knowledge questionnaire and an observational practice checklist.

Results: Nurses' knowledge scores improved significantly following the intervention (pre-intervention: 6.57 ± 1.79 vs. post-intervention: 10.23 ± 1.68; mean difference = 3.66; p < 0.001), with a very large effect size (Cohen's d = 2.12). Practice scores also increased significantly from 12.65 ± 1.83 to 16.38 ± 1.43 (mean difference = 3.73; p < 0.001), corresponding to a very large effect size (Cohen's d = 2.27).

Conclusion: The educational intervention was associated with substantial improvements in ICU nurses' knowledge and practices regarding endotracheal suctioning. However, because this study employed a single-group pretest-posttest design without a control group, the findings should be interpreted with caution, as causal relationships cannot be established. Regular in-service education is recommended to maintain competency and promote adherence to evidence-based endotracheal suctioning practices.

Clinical trial registration: Not applicable.

教育干预对重症监护护士气管内吸引知识和实践的有效性:单组前测后测研究。
背景:气管插管(ETT)吸引是重症监护病房(icu)机械通气患者气道管理的关键护理程序。正确的吸痰方法有助于减少并发症,包括呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)。然而,有证据表明,ICU护士对ETT抽吸的知识和实践仍然不够理想。本研究旨在评估教育干预对ICU护士ETT抽吸知识和实践的有效性。方法:在巴基斯坦白沙瓦的三家公立三级医院的重症监护病房(icu)进行了一项准实验性单组前测后测研究。采用方便抽样方法招募符合纳入标准并同意参与的合格ICU护士(n = 60)。采用结构化知识问卷和观察性实践检查表对教育干预前后的知识和实践进行评估。结果:干预后护士的知识得分显著提高(干预前:6.57±1.79 vs干预后:10.23±1.68;平均差值= 3.66;p)结论:教育干预与ICU护士气管吸痰知识和操作的显著提高相关。然而,由于本研究采用单组前测后测设计,没有对照组,因此研究结果应谨慎解释,因为无法建立因果关系。建议定期进行在职教育,以保持能力并促进坚持循证气管内吸痰做法。临床试验注册:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书