{"title":"Artificial intelligence in haematology laboratory diagnosis: Current applications, challenges, and future directions.","authors":"Hussam A Osman","doi":"10.4102/ajlm.v15i1.3130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming haematology diagnostics by improving accuracy, efficiency, and reproducibility in workflows traditionally reliant on manual microscopy and expert interpretation. Integrating AI into laboratory medicine presents opportunities to enhance diagnostic precision and reduce variability, particularly in resource-limited settings.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This narrative review examines the application of AI across major domains of haematology, morphological diagnosis, flow cytometry, cytogenetics, genomics, and clinical decision support, while addressing ethical, regulatory, and economic considerations relevant to global and African laboratory contexts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE identified studies describing or evaluating AI algorithms in haematologic diagnostics, focusing on model performance, validation level, and clinical applicability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Recent studies demonstrate strong performance of deep learning models, particularly convolutional neural networks and hybrid convolutional neural networks-transformer architectures, in automating blood and bone marrow morphology, detecting subtle dysplastic changes, and supporting digital workflows. In flow cytometry, AI enhances automated gating and rare event detection, while cytogenetic and genomic tools aid in karyotyping, variant classification, and structural abnormality recognition. Decision-support systems further assist in diagnostic triage and treatment planning. However, widespread implementation is limited by data heterogeneity, inadequate multicentre validation, and evolving ethical and regulatory frameworks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Advancing AI integration in haematology will require robust validation studies, explainable AI approaches, and equitable adoption strategies. Strengthening African laboratory systems through such innovations offers a pathway toward improved diagnostic capacity and sustainable digital transformation.</p><p><strong>What this study adds: </strong>The current study highlighted that AI is improving haematology laboratory tasks such as cell identification, differential diagnosis assistance, and result interpretation, but still faces challenges in validation, bias, and workflow integration. Future progress depends on stronger external validation, better explainable models, and closer collaboration between laboratory experts and AI specialists.</p>","PeriodicalId":45412,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Laboratory Medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":"3130"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13443926/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v15i1.3130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming haematology diagnostics by improving accuracy, efficiency, and reproducibility in workflows traditionally reliant on manual microscopy and expert interpretation. Integrating AI into laboratory medicine presents opportunities to enhance diagnostic precision and reduce variability, particularly in resource-limited settings.
Aim: This narrative review examines the application of AI across major domains of haematology, morphological diagnosis, flow cytometry, cytogenetics, genomics, and clinical decision support, while addressing ethical, regulatory, and economic considerations relevant to global and African laboratory contexts.
Methods: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE identified studies describing or evaluating AI algorithms in haematologic diagnostics, focusing on model performance, validation level, and clinical applicability.
Results: Recent studies demonstrate strong performance of deep learning models, particularly convolutional neural networks and hybrid convolutional neural networks-transformer architectures, in automating blood and bone marrow morphology, detecting subtle dysplastic changes, and supporting digital workflows. In flow cytometry, AI enhances automated gating and rare event detection, while cytogenetic and genomic tools aid in karyotyping, variant classification, and structural abnormality recognition. Decision-support systems further assist in diagnostic triage and treatment planning. However, widespread implementation is limited by data heterogeneity, inadequate multicentre validation, and evolving ethical and regulatory frameworks.
Conclusion: Advancing AI integration in haematology will require robust validation studies, explainable AI approaches, and equitable adoption strategies. Strengthening African laboratory systems through such innovations offers a pathway toward improved diagnostic capacity and sustainable digital transformation.
What this study adds: The current study highlighted that AI is improving haematology laboratory tasks such as cell identification, differential diagnosis assistance, and result interpretation, but still faces challenges in validation, bias, and workflow integration. Future progress depends on stronger external validation, better explainable models, and closer collaboration between laboratory experts and AI specialists.
背景:人工智能(AI)正在通过提高传统上依赖人工显微镜和专家解释的工作流程的准确性、效率和可重复性,改变血液学诊断。将人工智能纳入实验室医学提供了提高诊断准确性和减少可变性的机会,特别是在资源有限的环境中。目的:本文回顾了人工智能在血液学、形态学诊断、流式细胞术、细胞遗传学、基因组学和临床决策支持等主要领域的应用,同时解决了与全球和非洲实验室背景相关的伦理、监管和经济问题。方法:对PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和EMBASE进行综合文献检索,确定描述或评估血液学诊断中人工智能算法的研究,重点关注模型性能、验证水平和临床适用性。结果:最近的研究表明,深度学习模型,特别是卷积神经网络和混合卷积神经网络-变压器架构,在自动化血液和骨髓形态、检测细微的发育不良变化和支持数字工作流程方面具有强大的性能。在流式细胞术中,人工智能增强了自动门控和罕见事件检测,而细胞遗传学和基因组学工具有助于核型、变异分类和结构异常识别。决策支持系统进一步协助诊断分类和治疗计划。然而,广泛实施受到数据异质性、多中心验证不足以及不断发展的伦理和监管框架的限制。结论:推进人工智能在血液学中的整合将需要强有力的验证研究、可解释的人工智能方法和公平的采用策略。通过此类创新加强非洲实验室系统,为提高诊断能力和实现可持续数字化转型提供了一条途径。本研究补充:目前的研究强调,人工智能正在改善血液学实验室任务,如细胞鉴定、鉴别诊断辅助和结果解释,但在验证、偏倚和工作流程集成方面仍面临挑战。未来的进展取决于更强的外部验证、更好的可解释模型,以及实验室专家和人工智能专家之间更密切的合作。
期刊介绍:
The African Journal of Laboratory Medicine, the official journal of ASLM, focuses on the role of the laboratory and its professionals in the clinical and public healthcare sectors,and is specifically based on an African frame of reference. Emphasis is on all aspects that promote and contribute to the laboratory medicine practices of Africa. This includes, amongst others: laboratories, biomedical scientists and clinicians, medical community, public health officials and policy makers, laboratory systems and policies (translation of laboratory knowledge, practices and technologies in clinical care), interfaces of laboratory with medical science, laboratory-based epidemiology, laboratory investigations, evidence-based effectiveness in real world (actual) settings.