Empagliflozin versus dapagliflozin in patients with liver cirrhosis: A comparative real-world study on hepatic decompensation.

IF 2.1 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hepatology Forum Pub Date : 2026-04-14 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.14744/hf.2026.11444
Hatem Ahmed, Imad Alabdul Razzak, Eyad Abdulrazzak, Sameh Gomaa, Joelle Lauchner
{"title":"Empagliflozin versus dapagliflozin in patients with liver cirrhosis: A comparative real-world study on hepatic decompensation.","authors":"Hatem Ahmed, Imad Alabdul Razzak, Eyad Abdulrazzak, Sameh Gomaa, Joelle Lauchner","doi":"10.14744/hf.2026.11444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors may improve outcomes in liver cirrhosis, but comparative evidence between individual agents is limited. We compared real-world outcomes of empagliflozin versus dapagliflozin in adults with liver cirrhosis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX US Collaborative Network (69 healthcare organizations). Adults with cirrhosis who were newly prescribed empagliflozin or dapagliflozin after the diagnosis of cirrhosis between March 1, 2013 and January 1, 2025, were included. Propensity score matching (1:1) was used to balance baseline characteristics. Outcomes were assessed from day 1 after the index prescription through 5 years. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and all-cause hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included hepatic decompensation events. Tertiary outcomes included prognostic hepatic and renal biomarkers. Safety outcomes included the incidence of acute kidney injury, urinary tract infection, and diabetic ketoacidosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before matching, 17,700 empagliflozin users and 8,619 dapagliflozin users were identified; 7,852 patients remained in each cohort after matching. Five-year mortality was similar between groups (12.7% vs. 12.6%; odds ratio [OR]: 1.012, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.921-1.112; p=0.8075), as was the risk of hospitalization (14.7% vs. 13.4%; OR: 1.105, 95% CI: 0.94-1.30; p=0.216). Empagliflozin was associated with lower rates of hepatic encephalopathy (4.0% vs. 4.7%; OR: 0.84; p=0.0295), hepatorenal syndrome (1.0% vs. 1.6%; OR: 0.614; p=0.0007), and paracentesis (2.9% vs. 3.7%; OR: 0.785; p=0.0083). Albumin levels were higher and bilirubin levels were lower with empagliflozin (p<0.01 for both). Safety outcomes were similar between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In matched adults with cirrhosis, empagliflozin and dapagliflozin demonstrated comparable five-year mortality and hospitalization rates. However, empagliflozin was associated with fewer selected decompensation events without an increase in adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":29722,"journal":{"name":"Hepatology Forum","volume":"7 2","pages":"139-145"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13442726/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatology Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/hf.2026.11444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors may improve outcomes in liver cirrhosis, but comparative evidence between individual agents is limited. We compared real-world outcomes of empagliflozin versus dapagliflozin in adults with liver cirrhosis.

Materials and methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX US Collaborative Network (69 healthcare organizations). Adults with cirrhosis who were newly prescribed empagliflozin or dapagliflozin after the diagnosis of cirrhosis between March 1, 2013 and January 1, 2025, were included. Propensity score matching (1:1) was used to balance baseline characteristics. Outcomes were assessed from day 1 after the index prescription through 5 years. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and all-cause hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included hepatic decompensation events. Tertiary outcomes included prognostic hepatic and renal biomarkers. Safety outcomes included the incidence of acute kidney injury, urinary tract infection, and diabetic ketoacidosis.

Results: Before matching, 17,700 empagliflozin users and 8,619 dapagliflozin users were identified; 7,852 patients remained in each cohort after matching. Five-year mortality was similar between groups (12.7% vs. 12.6%; odds ratio [OR]: 1.012, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.921-1.112; p=0.8075), as was the risk of hospitalization (14.7% vs. 13.4%; OR: 1.105, 95% CI: 0.94-1.30; p=0.216). Empagliflozin was associated with lower rates of hepatic encephalopathy (4.0% vs. 4.7%; OR: 0.84; p=0.0295), hepatorenal syndrome (1.0% vs. 1.6%; OR: 0.614; p=0.0007), and paracentesis (2.9% vs. 3.7%; OR: 0.785; p=0.0083). Albumin levels were higher and bilirubin levels were lower with empagliflozin (p<0.01 for both). Safety outcomes were similar between groups.

Conclusion: In matched adults with cirrhosis, empagliflozin and dapagliflozin demonstrated comparable five-year mortality and hospitalization rates. However, empagliflozin was associated with fewer selected decompensation events without an increase in adverse events.

肝硬化患者的恩格列净与达格列净:肝脏失代偿的比较现实世界研究。
背景和目的:钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2抑制剂可能改善肝硬化的预后,但个体药物之间的比较证据有限。我们比较了恩格列净与达格列净在成人肝硬化患者中的实际结果。材料和方法:我们使用TriNetX美国协作网络(69家医疗机构)进行了一项多中心回顾性队列研究。在2013年3月1日至2025年1月1日期间诊断为肝硬化后新开恩格列净或达格列净的肝硬化成人纳入研究。倾向评分匹配(1:1)用于平衡基线特征。从指标处方后第1天到5年评估结果。主要结局为全因死亡率和全因住院。次要结局包括肝失代偿事件。第三期预后包括肝和肾生物标志物的预后。安全性指标包括急性肾损伤、尿路感染和糖尿病酮症酸中毒的发生率。结果:配对前,共识别出依帕列净使用者17,700人,达帕列净使用者8,619人;配对后,每个队列中仍有7852名患者。两组间5年死亡率相似(12.7%比12.6%;比值比[OR]: 1.012, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.921-1.112; p=0.8075),住院风险相似(14.7%比13.4%;OR: 1.105, 95% CI: 0.94-1.30; p=0.216)。恩格列净与肝性脑病(4.0% vs. 4.7%; OR: 0.84; p=0.0295)、肝肾综合征(1.0% vs. 1.6%; OR: 0.614; p=0.0007)和穿刺(2.9% vs. 3.7%; OR: 0.785; p=0.0083)发生率较低相关。恩帕列净组白蛋白水平较高,胆红素水平较低(结论:在配对的肝硬化成人中,恩帕列净和达格列净的5年死亡率和住院率相当。然而,恩格列净与较少的选择性失代偿事件相关,而不良事件没有增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书