Fernanda Roberta de Faria Rocha da Silva, Gilberto da Cruz Leal, Roberta de Carvalho Barabás, Katia Nemr
{"title":"What has been researched about implicit memory in speech-language-hearing pathology? A scoping review.","authors":"Fernanda Roberta de Faria Rocha da Silva, Gilberto da Cruz Leal, Roberta de Carvalho Barabás, Katia Nemr","doi":"10.1590/2317-1782/e20250338pt","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>to map how implicit memory has been addressed in international scientific speech-language-hearing production.</p><p><strong>Research strategies: </strong>An electronic search was conducted in the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases, supplemented by a manual search of references of the included studies. The scoping review was conducted based on the Joanna Briggs Institute Evidence Synthesis Manual, following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. The protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework (10.17605/OSF.IO/PNDWF).</p><p><strong>Selection: </strong>criteria: Studies addressing implicit memory in speech-language-hearing contexts, in Portuguese, English, or Spanish, regardless of year of publication, were included.</p><p><strong>Data: </strong>analysis: Two reviewers independently extracted data, considering design, population, objectives, and main outcomes. The studies were grouped by area of application and synthesized by descriptive and narrative analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,565 documents were identified, of which 39 comprised this review. The studies were grouped into three categories (language, audiology, and voice). The most frequent themes found were the application of implicit learning in speech-language-hearing contexts; the use of implicit tasks for the assessment and characterization of disorders; and investigations of biases, prejudices, and/or implicit perceptions in speech-language-hearing practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The literature deals with implicit memory in a limited and heterogeneous manner, mainly in language, audiology, and voice, focusing on implicit learning, assessment, and biases. Despite its clinical potential, there is a lack of conceptual and methodological systematization, indicating the need for future research to consolidate its use in the field.</p>","PeriodicalId":46547,"journal":{"name":"CoDAS","volume":"38 5","pages":"e20250338"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13445993/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CoDAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/e20250338pt","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: to map how implicit memory has been addressed in international scientific speech-language-hearing production.
Research strategies: An electronic search was conducted in the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases, supplemented by a manual search of references of the included studies. The scoping review was conducted based on the Joanna Briggs Institute Evidence Synthesis Manual, following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. The protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework (10.17605/OSF.IO/PNDWF).
Selection: criteria: Studies addressing implicit memory in speech-language-hearing contexts, in Portuguese, English, or Spanish, regardless of year of publication, were included.
Data: analysis: Two reviewers independently extracted data, considering design, population, objectives, and main outcomes. The studies were grouped by area of application and synthesized by descriptive and narrative analysis.
Results: A total of 2,565 documents were identified, of which 39 comprised this review. The studies were grouped into three categories (language, audiology, and voice). The most frequent themes found were the application of implicit learning in speech-language-hearing contexts; the use of implicit tasks for the assessment and characterization of disorders; and investigations of biases, prejudices, and/or implicit perceptions in speech-language-hearing practice.
Conclusion: The literature deals with implicit memory in a limited and heterogeneous manner, mainly in language, audiology, and voice, focusing on implicit learning, assessment, and biases. Despite its clinical potential, there is a lack of conceptual and methodological systematization, indicating the need for future research to consolidate its use in the field.
目的:绘制内隐记忆在国际科学言语-语言-听力生产中是如何被处理的。研究策略:在PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus、Embase、CINAHL和PsycINFO数据库中进行电子检索,并辅以人工检索纳入研究的参考文献。范围审查是根据乔安娜布里格斯研究所证据综合手册,遵循PRISMA-ScR指南进行的。该协议已在开放科学框架(10.17605/OSF.IO/PNDWF)中注册。选择:标准:包括语言听力背景下的内隐记忆研究,包括葡萄牙语、英语或西班牙语,与发表年份无关。数据:分析:两位审稿人独立提取数据,考虑设计、人群、目标和主要结果。这些研究按应用领域分组,并通过描述性和叙述性分析进行综合。结果:共纳入2565份文献,其中39份纳入本综述。研究分为三类(语言、听力学和声音)。最常见的主题是内隐学习在言语-语言-听力环境中的应用;使用隐性任务来评估和表征障碍;以及对言语听力练习中的偏见、偏见和/或内隐感知的调查。结论:文献对内隐记忆的研究是有限且异质性的,主要集中在语言、听力学和语音方面,重点关注内隐学习、评估和偏见。尽管它具有临床潜力,但缺乏概念和方法的系统化,这表明需要未来的研究来巩固其在该领域的应用。