Embolization of spontaneous portosystemic shunts for refractory hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis patients:A meta-analysis.

IF 2.1 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hepatology Forum Pub Date : 2026-04-28 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.14744/hf.2025.59487
Parth Patel, Mohamad Ebrahim, Eli Zaher, Himsikhar Khataniar, Priyadarshini Loganathan, Douglas G Adler
{"title":"Embolization of spontaneous portosystemic shunts for refractory hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis patients:A meta-analysis.","authors":"Parth Patel, Mohamad Ebrahim, Eli Zaher, Himsikhar Khataniar, Priyadarshini Loganathan, Douglas G Adler","doi":"10.14744/hf.2025.59487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Hepatic encephalopathy is an important cause of morbidity in cirrhosis patients. The presence of spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSS) is associated with an increased risk of recurrent/refractory hepatic encephalopathy (HE). Embolization of SPSS has been shown to improve HE symptoms, but it may worsen portal hypertension and related complications. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of SPSS embolization for recurrent/refractory HE.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Five databases were screened to identify studies assessing the efficacy of SPSS embolization for HE. The random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled rates, and I2% values were used to assess heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 331 patients with recurrent or refractory HE despite medical management. The etiology of cirrhosis included ethanol abuse, chronic viral hepatitis, MASH, and others. Following embolization, 82% of patients had HE-related clinical improvement, and 71% of patients became free from HE-related hospitalization. The mean difference in pre- and post-embolization serum ammonia levels was 104 [77-130], p<0.01. Worsening portal hypertension following embolization presented as gastrointestinal bleeding (10%), new or aggravated varices (15%), and new or aggravated ascites (15%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SPSS embolization demonstrated improvement in HE-related clinical symptoms with a decreased need for hospitalization, but it exacerbates portal hypertension, increasing the risks of ascites, varices, and gastrointestinal bleeding. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy of SPSS embolization against standard medical management.</p>","PeriodicalId":29722,"journal":{"name":"Hepatology Forum","volume":"7 2","pages":"91-100"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13442353/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatology Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/hf.2025.59487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: Hepatic encephalopathy is an important cause of morbidity in cirrhosis patients. The presence of spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSS) is associated with an increased risk of recurrent/refractory hepatic encephalopathy (HE). Embolization of SPSS has been shown to improve HE symptoms, but it may worsen portal hypertension and related complications. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of SPSS embolization for recurrent/refractory HE.

Materials and methods: Five databases were screened to identify studies assessing the efficacy of SPSS embolization for HE. The random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled rates, and I2% values were used to assess heterogeneity.

Results: Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 331 patients with recurrent or refractory HE despite medical management. The etiology of cirrhosis included ethanol abuse, chronic viral hepatitis, MASH, and others. Following embolization, 82% of patients had HE-related clinical improvement, and 71% of patients became free from HE-related hospitalization. The mean difference in pre- and post-embolization serum ammonia levels was 104 [77-130], p<0.01. Worsening portal hypertension following embolization presented as gastrointestinal bleeding (10%), new or aggravated varices (15%), and new or aggravated ascites (15%).

Conclusion: SPSS embolization demonstrated improvement in HE-related clinical symptoms with a decreased need for hospitalization, but it exacerbates portal hypertension, increasing the risks of ascites, varices, and gastrointestinal bleeding. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy of SPSS embolization against standard medical management.

肝硬化难治性肝性脑病患者自发性门系统分流栓塞治疗:荟萃分析。
背景与目的:肝性脑病是肝硬化患者发病的重要原因。自发性门系统分流(SPSS)的存在与复发性/难治性肝性脑病(HE)的风险增加有关。SPSS栓塞已被证明可以改善HE症状,但它可能加重门脉高压和相关并发症。本研究的目的是确定SPSS栓塞治疗复发/难治性HE的疗效。材料和方法:筛选5个数据库,以确定评估SPSS栓塞治疗HE疗效的研究。随机效应模型用于计算合并率,I2%值用于评估异质性。结果:21项研究符合纳入标准,包括331例经医学治疗后复发或难治性HE患者。肝硬化的病因包括酒精滥用、慢性病毒性肝炎、MASH等。栓塞后,82%的患者有he相关临床改善,71%的患者没有he相关住院。栓塞前后血清氨水平的平均差异为104[77-130]。结论:SPSS栓塞可改善he相关临床症状,减少住院需求,但会加剧门静脉高压,增加腹水、静脉曲张和胃肠道出血的风险。需要未来的随机对照试验来评估SPSS栓塞与标准医疗管理的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书