Enhancing Broiler Production With Humic Acid and Probiotics: Effects on Growth Performance, Carcass Traits, Immune Response, Gut Microbiota, and Economic Feasibility.

IF 2.3 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Veterinary Medicine International Pub Date : 2026-08-05 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1155/vmi/5944905
Md Khalaquzzman, Md Mufazzal Hossain, Md Imran Hossain
{"title":"Enhancing Broiler Production With Humic Acid and Probiotics: Effects on Growth Performance, Carcass Traits, Immune Response, Gut Microbiota, and Economic Feasibility.","authors":"Md Khalaquzzman, Md Mufazzal Hossain, Md Imran Hossain","doi":"10.1155/vmi/5944905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Humic acid and probiotics are increasingly used as natural alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters in poultry production. Humic substances have been reported to support nutrient absorption and gut health, while probiotics enhance microbial balance and immune function.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the individual and combined effects of humic acid and probiotics on growth performance, carcass characteristics, immune parameters, caecal bacterial populations (<i>Escherichia coli</i>, <i>Salmonella</i> spp., and <i>Lactobacillus</i> spp.), and the financial feasibility of broiler production.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 195 one-day-old Lohmann Meat (Indian River) broiler chicks were allocated in a completely randomized design with five dietary treatments and 3 replicates of 13 birds each. Dietary treatments were as follows: a basal diet (control), a basal diet with 0.05% humic acid, a basal diet with 0.10% humic acid, a basal diet with 0.02% probiotics, and a basal diet containing both 0.05% humic acid and 0.02% probiotics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dietary inclusion of humic acid or probiotics did not significantly affect (<i>p</i> > 0.05) body weight gain, feed intake, or feed conversion ratio at 28 days (market age), but significant improvements were observed at 7, 14, and 21 days. However, the combined supplementation of 0.05% humic acid and 0.02% probiotics significantly improved several carcass traits (thigh, drumstick, back, wing, and liver weights), reduced caecal pathogenic bacteria (<i>E. coli</i> and <i>Salmonella spp</i>.), increased beneficial <i>Lactobacillus spp</i>., and enhanced immune parameters (higher lymphocyte percentage and lower white blood cell counts) compared to the control (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Hematological values remained within normal physiological ranges across all treatments. Economic analysis revealed that the combined supplementation group recorded the highest net present value (176.44 USD), internal rate of return (43.51%), and benefit-cost ratio (1.22), and the shortest payback period (1.93 years).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, this study demonstrated that dietary supplementation with humic acid and probiotics, particularly in combination, improved carcass traits, reduced pathogenic bacterial loads, enhanced selected immune parameters, and increased economic returns without affecting growth performance at 28 days.</p>","PeriodicalId":23503,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Medicine International","volume":"2026 ","pages":"5944905"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13443120/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Medicine International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/vmi/5944905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Humic acid and probiotics are increasingly used as natural alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters in poultry production. Humic substances have been reported to support nutrient absorption and gut health, while probiotics enhance microbial balance and immune function.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the individual and combined effects of humic acid and probiotics on growth performance, carcass characteristics, immune parameters, caecal bacterial populations (Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., and Lactobacillus spp.), and the financial feasibility of broiler production.

Methods: A total of 195 one-day-old Lohmann Meat (Indian River) broiler chicks were allocated in a completely randomized design with five dietary treatments and 3 replicates of 13 birds each. Dietary treatments were as follows: a basal diet (control), a basal diet with 0.05% humic acid, a basal diet with 0.10% humic acid, a basal diet with 0.02% probiotics, and a basal diet containing both 0.05% humic acid and 0.02% probiotics.

Results: Dietary inclusion of humic acid or probiotics did not significantly affect (p > 0.05) body weight gain, feed intake, or feed conversion ratio at 28 days (market age), but significant improvements were observed at 7, 14, and 21 days. However, the combined supplementation of 0.05% humic acid and 0.02% probiotics significantly improved several carcass traits (thigh, drumstick, back, wing, and liver weights), reduced caecal pathogenic bacteria (E. coli and Salmonella spp.), increased beneficial Lactobacillus spp., and enhanced immune parameters (higher lymphocyte percentage and lower white blood cell counts) compared to the control (p < 0.05). Hematological values remained within normal physiological ranges across all treatments. Economic analysis revealed that the combined supplementation group recorded the highest net present value (176.44 USD), internal rate of return (43.51%), and benefit-cost ratio (1.22), and the shortest payback period (1.93 years).

Conclusions: Overall, this study demonstrated that dietary supplementation with humic acid and probiotics, particularly in combination, improved carcass traits, reduced pathogenic bacterial loads, enhanced selected immune parameters, and increased economic returns without affecting growth performance at 28 days.

腐植酸和益生菌提高肉鸡产量:对生长性能、胴体性状、免疫反应、肠道菌群和经济可行性的影响
背景:腐植酸和益生菌越来越多地被用作家禽生产中抗生素生长促进剂的天然替代品。据报道,腐殖质物质支持营养吸收和肠道健康,而益生菌增强微生物平衡和免疫功能。目的:本研究旨在评价腐植酸和益生菌对肉鸡生长性能、胴体特性、免疫参数、盲肠菌群(大肠杆菌、沙门氏菌和乳杆菌)的单独和联合影响,以及肉鸡生产的经济可行性。方法:选用195只1日龄罗曼肉(印度河)肉鸡,采用完全随机设计,分为5个饲粮处理,每3个重复,每个重复13只鸡。饲粮处理为:基础饲粮(对照)、基础饲粮中添加0.05%腐植酸、基础饲粮中添加0.10%腐植酸、基础饲粮中添加0.02%益生菌、基础饲粮中同时添加0.05%腐植酸和0.02%益生菌。结果:饲粮中添加腐植酸或益生菌对28日龄(市场日龄)的增重、采食量或饲料系数无显著影响(p < 0.05),但在7、14和21日龄有显著改善。然而,与对照组相比,0.05%腐植酸和0.02%益生菌联合添加显著改善了胴体性状(大腿、鸡腿、背部、翅膀和肝脏重量),减少了盲肠致病菌(大肠杆菌和沙门氏菌),增加了有益乳杆菌,增强了免疫参数(淋巴细胞百分比提高,白细胞计数降低)(p < 0.05)。在所有治疗过程中,血液学值保持在正常的生理范围内。经济分析显示,联合补充组净现值最高(176.44美元),内部收益率(43.51%),效益成本比(1.22),投资回收期最短(1.93年)。结论:总体而言,本研究表明,饲粮中添加腐植酸和益生菌,特别是组合添加,在不影响28日龄生长性能的情况下,改善了胴体性状,减少了致病菌负荷,增强了选定的免疫参数,提高了经济回报。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary Medicine International
Veterinary Medicine International Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
55
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Medicine International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles and review articles in all areas of veterinary research. The journal will consider articles on the biological basis of disease, as well as diagnosis, prevention, treatment, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书