Rethinking perioperative neurocognitive risk reduction in older surgical patients: mobility-preserving analgesia, early mobilization, and multidisciplinary care.

IF 4 4区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Keisuke Nakazawa
{"title":"Rethinking perioperative neurocognitive risk reduction in older surgical patients: mobility-preserving analgesia, early mobilization, and multidisciplinary care.","authors":"Keisuke Nakazawa","doi":"10.4097/kja.26138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Perioperative neurocognitive risk in older surgical patients may be influenced not only by intraoperative anesthetic management, but also by postoperative factors that are modifiable, including pain, opioid exposure, immobility, and delayed rehabilitation. Large randomized trials that compared general anesthesia with neuraxial anesthesia in older patients undergoing hip fracture surgery found no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative delirium (POD) or functional outcomes. These findings have been widely interpreted as evidence that the anesthetic modality used has little impact on perioperative neurocognitive disorders (PND); however, neuraxial techniques and peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) were not evaluated separately and postoperative analgesic strategies and early mobilization were not standardized in these studies. In this narrative review, we re-examine the current evidence and propose a shift in emphasis from the traditional dichotomy of \"general versus regional anesthesia\" toward postoperative analgesia, opioid minimization, and early mobilization. We found that, although neuroinflammation is relevant to the biological context of postoperative cognitive decline, direct evidence indicating that PNBs attenuate systemic inflammatory responses or improve neurocognitive outcomes via this mechanism in humans remains limited. Motor-sparing PNBs may be considered potential enablers of effective analgesia, reduced opioid exposure, and early mobilization within a multidisciplinary perioperative pathway, rather than as interventions with an established direct anti-inflammatory or neuroprotective effect. We review procedure-specific recommendations from the PROSPECT guidelines, discuss the role of PNBs within a Brain-Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (Brain-ERAS) framework, and identify priorities for the prospective evaluation of neurocognitive outcomes in older surgical patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":17855,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.26138","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Perioperative neurocognitive risk in older surgical patients may be influenced not only by intraoperative anesthetic management, but also by postoperative factors that are modifiable, including pain, opioid exposure, immobility, and delayed rehabilitation. Large randomized trials that compared general anesthesia with neuraxial anesthesia in older patients undergoing hip fracture surgery found no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative delirium (POD) or functional outcomes. These findings have been widely interpreted as evidence that the anesthetic modality used has little impact on perioperative neurocognitive disorders (PND); however, neuraxial techniques and peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) were not evaluated separately and postoperative analgesic strategies and early mobilization were not standardized in these studies. In this narrative review, we re-examine the current evidence and propose a shift in emphasis from the traditional dichotomy of "general versus regional anesthesia" toward postoperative analgesia, opioid minimization, and early mobilization. We found that, although neuroinflammation is relevant to the biological context of postoperative cognitive decline, direct evidence indicating that PNBs attenuate systemic inflammatory responses or improve neurocognitive outcomes via this mechanism in humans remains limited. Motor-sparing PNBs may be considered potential enablers of effective analgesia, reduced opioid exposure, and early mobilization within a multidisciplinary perioperative pathway, rather than as interventions with an established direct anti-inflammatory or neuroprotective effect. We review procedure-specific recommendations from the PROSPECT guidelines, discuss the role of PNBs within a Brain-Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (Brain-ERAS) framework, and identify priorities for the prospective evaluation of neurocognitive outcomes in older surgical patients.

重新思考老年外科患者围手术期神经认知风险的降低:保持活动能力的镇痛、早期活动和多学科护理。
老年外科患者围手术期神经认知风险不仅可能受到术中麻醉管理的影响,还可能受到术后可改变的因素的影响,包括疼痛、阿片类药物暴露、不活动和延迟康复。对老年髋部骨折手术患者进行全身麻醉与轴向麻醉比较的大型随机试验发现,在术后谵妄(POD)发生率或功能结局方面没有显著差异。这些发现被广泛解释为使用麻醉方式对围手术期神经认知障碍(PND)影响很小的证据;然而,在这些研究中,轴突技术和周围神经阻滞(PNBs)没有单独评估,术后镇痛策略和早期活动也没有标准化。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们重新审视了目前的证据,并提出将重点从传统的“全身麻醉与区域麻醉”的二分法转向术后镇痛、阿片类药物最小化和早期活动。我们发现,尽管神经炎症与术后认知能力下降的生物学背景有关,但在人类中,表明PNBs通过这一机制减轻全身炎症反应或改善神经认知结果的直接证据仍然有限。运动保留pnb可能被认为是有效镇痛、减少阿片类药物暴露和多学科围手术期早期动员的潜在促成因素,而不是作为具有直接抗炎或神经保护作用的干预措施。我们回顾了PROSPECT指南中具体的手术建议,讨论了pnb在脑后增强恢复(Brain-ERAS)框架中的作用,并确定了老年手术患者神经认知结果前瞻性评估的优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.90%
发文量
84
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书