Eva de Bruijn, Mathilde Laetitia Pas, Donatienne Castelain, Alexander Dufourni, Ellen Paulussen, Bart Pardon
{"title":"Evaluation of sequential serum amyloid A measurements for the prediction of sepsis and survival in critically ill neonatal foals.","authors":"Eva de Bruijn, Mathilde Laetitia Pas, Donatienne Castelain, Alexander Dufourni, Ellen Paulussen, Bart Pardon","doi":"10.1093/jvimsj/aalag155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Single measurements of serum amyloid A (SAA) concentration at hospital admission has limited sensitivity for predicting sepsis and death.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis/objectives: </strong>To determine whether differences in SAA during the first 2 days of hospitalization could predict sepsis and death in critically ill foals.</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>One hundred twenty-seven critically ill neonatal foals, <14 days of age.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective cohort study. SAA was measured at hospital admission and on day 2 of hospitalization using a validated point-of-care test. Logistic regression was conducted to evaluate the predictive value of individual SAA measurements for diagnosing sepsis and assess whether change in SAA during 48 h could predict sepsis or death. Cox survival analysis assessed the association between SAA concentration and death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Serum amyloid A (SAA) concentrations were measured on day 0 (n = 127) and day 2 (n = 97) of hospitalization. On admission and day 2, SAA was not significantly associated with death (P = .20 and P = .08), but was significantly associated with neutropenia (OR 1.001; 95% CI, 1.001-1.1002; P ≤ .001), blood culture positivity (OR 1.001; 95% CI, 1.0-1.1001; P = .002), or both (OR 1.002; 95% CI, 1.001-1.1003; P ≤ .001), with optimal cut-offs of 419 μg/mL on day 0, with moderate sensitivity and specificity (80% and 81%, respectively). Changes between day 0 and day 2 were not predictive for death (P = .49), neutropenia (P = .36), blood culture positivity (P = .41) or both (P = .17).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical importance: </strong>In this cohort, SAA only had moderate ability to rule in or rule out sepsis or predict death. Repeated measurements after 48 h did not improve accuracy, suggesting that SAA should not be used as a standalone test.</p>","PeriodicalId":17462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine","volume":"40 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13446502/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jvimsj/aalag155","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Single measurements of serum amyloid A (SAA) concentration at hospital admission has limited sensitivity for predicting sepsis and death.
Hypothesis/objectives: To determine whether differences in SAA during the first 2 days of hospitalization could predict sepsis and death in critically ill foals.
Animals: One hundred twenty-seven critically ill neonatal foals, <14 days of age.
Methods: Prospective cohort study. SAA was measured at hospital admission and on day 2 of hospitalization using a validated point-of-care test. Logistic regression was conducted to evaluate the predictive value of individual SAA measurements for diagnosing sepsis and assess whether change in SAA during 48 h could predict sepsis or death. Cox survival analysis assessed the association between SAA concentration and death.
Results: Serum amyloid A (SAA) concentrations were measured on day 0 (n = 127) and day 2 (n = 97) of hospitalization. On admission and day 2, SAA was not significantly associated with death (P = .20 and P = .08), but was significantly associated with neutropenia (OR 1.001; 95% CI, 1.001-1.1002; P ≤ .001), blood culture positivity (OR 1.001; 95% CI, 1.0-1.1001; P = .002), or both (OR 1.002; 95% CI, 1.001-1.1003; P ≤ .001), with optimal cut-offs of 419 μg/mL on day 0, with moderate sensitivity and specificity (80% and 81%, respectively). Changes between day 0 and day 2 were not predictive for death (P = .49), neutropenia (P = .36), blood culture positivity (P = .41) or both (P = .17).
Conclusions and clinical importance: In this cohort, SAA only had moderate ability to rule in or rule out sepsis or predict death. Repeated measurements after 48 h did not improve accuracy, suggesting that SAA should not be used as a standalone test.
期刊介绍:
The mission of the Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine is to advance veterinary medical knowledge and improve the lives of animals by publication of authoritative scientific articles of animal diseases.