Insights from the development of an online toolkit to promote community-engaged substance use research in the Southwest Borderlands Region.

IF 2.7 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2026-07-16 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1017/cts.2026.10804
Andrew Gorvetzian, Maria Sanchez, Christina Phillips, Joseph Allbright, Alexandra Yonkovich, Cynthia Killough, Randy Benally, Janet Page-Reeves, Mary Alice Scott, Kimberly Page, Ivan de la Rosa
{"title":"Insights from the development of an online toolkit to promote community-engaged substance use research in the Southwest Borderlands Region.","authors":"Andrew Gorvetzian, Maria Sanchez, Christina Phillips, Joseph Allbright, Alexandra Yonkovich, Cynthia Killough, Randy Benally, Janet Page-Reeves, Mary Alice Scott, Kimberly Page, Ivan de la Rosa","doi":"10.1017/cts.2026.10804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Underrepresented communities in the Southwestern United States Borderlands region face disproportionate substance use disorder (SUD) burdens yet remain largely excluded from clinical trials. No existing resource integrates health beliefs, research literacy, and vulnerability frameworks to support diverse community engagement in SUD clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed the Exploring Health Beliefs for Community Engagement and Diversity in Clinical Trials (EXPLORE) Toolkit through a multi-phase process (2021-2024) including systematic review of existing toolkits, domain development, platform design, individual interviews (<i>n</i> = 10), and two rounds of theater testing with community health workers serving Hispanic communities in Southern New Mexico (<i>n</i> = 60) and American Indian communities in Northern New Mexico (<i>n</i> = 25). Pre/post surveys assessed feasibility, acceptability, community interest, and research literacy. Ripple Effects Mapping evaluated the development process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Domain-specific toolkit importance ratings averaged 4.48-4.61 on a 5-point scale; 79% of participants rated the toolkit \"very important\" for promoting culturally competent research, and 64% were \"very likely\" to recommend it. Post-theater testing scores improved for perceived feasibility of conducting clinical research in participants' communities (pre: 7.19 vs. post: 7.94, 10-point scale) and research terminology understanding (pre: 7.97 vs. post: 8.74). Qualitative themes included cultural appropriateness, the role of community gatekeepers, and confidentiality concerns in rural and border communities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The EXPLORE Toolkit demonstrates promise for bridging researcher-community gaps in SUD clinical trials. Findings highlight the value of interdisciplinary, community-centered development and the need for ongoing cultural adaptation. The toolkit is freely available at https://www.exploretoolkit.org/.</p>","PeriodicalId":15529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"10 1","pages":"e139"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13445463/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2026.10804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Underrepresented communities in the Southwestern United States Borderlands region face disproportionate substance use disorder (SUD) burdens yet remain largely excluded from clinical trials. No existing resource integrates health beliefs, research literacy, and vulnerability frameworks to support diverse community engagement in SUD clinical trials.

Methods: We developed the Exploring Health Beliefs for Community Engagement and Diversity in Clinical Trials (EXPLORE) Toolkit through a multi-phase process (2021-2024) including systematic review of existing toolkits, domain development, platform design, individual interviews (n = 10), and two rounds of theater testing with community health workers serving Hispanic communities in Southern New Mexico (n = 60) and American Indian communities in Northern New Mexico (n = 25). Pre/post surveys assessed feasibility, acceptability, community interest, and research literacy. Ripple Effects Mapping evaluated the development process.

Results: Domain-specific toolkit importance ratings averaged 4.48-4.61 on a 5-point scale; 79% of participants rated the toolkit "very important" for promoting culturally competent research, and 64% were "very likely" to recommend it. Post-theater testing scores improved for perceived feasibility of conducting clinical research in participants' communities (pre: 7.19 vs. post: 7.94, 10-point scale) and research terminology understanding (pre: 7.97 vs. post: 8.74). Qualitative themes included cultural appropriateness, the role of community gatekeepers, and confidentiality concerns in rural and border communities.

Conclusions: The EXPLORE Toolkit demonstrates promise for bridging researcher-community gaps in SUD clinical trials. Findings highlight the value of interdisciplinary, community-centered development and the need for ongoing cultural adaptation. The toolkit is freely available at https://www.exploretoolkit.org/.

从开发在线工具包中获得的见解,以促进西南边境地区社区参与的物质使用研究。
背景:美国西南部边境地区代表性不足的社区面临着不成比例的物质使用障碍(SUD)负担,但在很大程度上仍被排除在临床试验之外。没有现有的资源整合健康信念、研究素养和脆弱性框架来支持不同社区参与SUD临床试验。方法:我们通过多阶段过程(2021-2024)开发了探索社区参与和临床试验多样性的健康信念(EXPLORE)工具包,包括对现有工具包的系统回顾、领域开发、平台设计、个人访谈(n = 10),以及对服务于新墨西哥州南部西班牙裔社区(n = 60)和新墨西哥州北部美洲印第安社区(n = 25)的社区卫生工作者的两轮剧院测试。前后调查评估了可行性、可接受性、社区兴趣和研究素养。Ripple Effects Mapping评估了开发过程。结果:特定领域的工具包重要性评级平均为4.48-4.61(5分制);79%的参与者认为该工具包对促进文化能力研究“非常重要”,64%的人“很可能”推荐它。在参与者社区进行临床研究的感知可行性(前:7.19 vs后:7.94,10分制)和研究术语理解(前:7.97 vs后:8.74)方面,戏剧后测试得分有所提高。定性主题包括文化适宜性、社区看门人的作用以及农村和边境社区的保密问题。结论:EXPLORE工具包展示了在SUD临床试验中弥合研究人员与社区差距的希望。研究结果强调了跨学科、以社区为中心的发展的价值,以及不断适应文化的必要性。该工具包可在https://www.exploretoolkit.org/免费获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
26.90%
发文量
437
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书