Exploring the Sensitivity Limits of Neuronal Current Imaging With MRI and MEG in the Human Brain

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Milena Capiglioni, Davide Tabarelli, Stefano Tambalo, Federico Turco, Roland Wiest, Jorge Jovicich
{"title":"Exploring the Sensitivity Limits of Neuronal Current Imaging With MRI and MEG in the Human Brain","authors":"Milena Capiglioni,&nbsp;Davide Tabarelli,&nbsp;Stefano Tambalo,&nbsp;Federico Turco,&nbsp;Roland Wiest,&nbsp;Jorge Jovicich","doi":"10.1002/hbm.70624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Conventional BOLD-fMRI relies on hemodynamic responses that are temporally and spatially indirect markers of neural activity. Developing alternative contrasts, sensitive to neuroelectrical phenomena, is a critical challenge in brain imaging. Spin-lock (SL) fMRI has shown promise in phantom studies for detecting magnetic field changes associated with neuronal activity, but its in-vivo sensitivity and practicality remain unclear. This study evaluated whether SL contrast can effectively detect and localize human neuronal activation, benchmarked against complementary functional modalities, magnetoencephalography (MEG) and 3T BOLD-fMRI, to assess the sensitivity of MR-based neuronal current imaging. Thirteen healthy young volunteers underwent SL-based imaging during 8 Hz visual stimulation, along with BOLD and MEG acquisitions. Subjects viewed quadrant-checkerboard stimuli to elicit localized cortical responses. Two balanced SL contrast mechanisms, rotary excitation (REX) and stimulus-induced rotary saturation (SIRS), were employed. Postprocessing targeted stimulus-locked signal fluctuations using a regression-filtering-rectification strategy. Phantom experiments tested sensitivity and analysis pipeline performance. MEG revealed robust stimulus-locked responses in the occipital cortex, with estimated local magnetic field amplitudes of ~0.07 nT. Conventional BOLD-fMRI confirmed reliable hemodynamic activation. In contrast, neither balanced REX nor balanced SIRS produced consistent stimulus-related activation in vivo. Phantom experiments subsequently yielded detection thresholds of 0.2 nT for REX and 0.6 nT for SIRS, exceeding the MEG-estimated physiological field amplitudes. Under the present experimental conditions, the tested spin-lock fMRI implementations did not achieve sufficient sensitivity for reliable in vivo detection of neuronal magnetic fields at 3T. Phantom and MEG-based estimates indicate that physiological field amplitudes in the visual cortex lie below current detection limits. These findings establish quantitative constraints on direct neuronal current imaging with MRI and provide a benchmark for future methodological developments aimed at bridging electrophysiology and functional MRI.</p>","PeriodicalId":13019,"journal":{"name":"Human Brain Mapping","volume":"47 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13449028/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Brain Mapping","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.70624","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conventional BOLD-fMRI relies on hemodynamic responses that are temporally and spatially indirect markers of neural activity. Developing alternative contrasts, sensitive to neuroelectrical phenomena, is a critical challenge in brain imaging. Spin-lock (SL) fMRI has shown promise in phantom studies for detecting magnetic field changes associated with neuronal activity, but its in-vivo sensitivity and practicality remain unclear. This study evaluated whether SL contrast can effectively detect and localize human neuronal activation, benchmarked against complementary functional modalities, magnetoencephalography (MEG) and 3T BOLD-fMRI, to assess the sensitivity of MR-based neuronal current imaging. Thirteen healthy young volunteers underwent SL-based imaging during 8 Hz visual stimulation, along with BOLD and MEG acquisitions. Subjects viewed quadrant-checkerboard stimuli to elicit localized cortical responses. Two balanced SL contrast mechanisms, rotary excitation (REX) and stimulus-induced rotary saturation (SIRS), were employed. Postprocessing targeted stimulus-locked signal fluctuations using a regression-filtering-rectification strategy. Phantom experiments tested sensitivity and analysis pipeline performance. MEG revealed robust stimulus-locked responses in the occipital cortex, with estimated local magnetic field amplitudes of ~0.07 nT. Conventional BOLD-fMRI confirmed reliable hemodynamic activation. In contrast, neither balanced REX nor balanced SIRS produced consistent stimulus-related activation in vivo. Phantom experiments subsequently yielded detection thresholds of 0.2 nT for REX and 0.6 nT for SIRS, exceeding the MEG-estimated physiological field amplitudes. Under the present experimental conditions, the tested spin-lock fMRI implementations did not achieve sufficient sensitivity for reliable in vivo detection of neuronal magnetic fields at 3T. Phantom and MEG-based estimates indicate that physiological field amplitudes in the visual cortex lie below current detection limits. These findings establish quantitative constraints on direct neuronal current imaging with MRI and provide a benchmark for future methodological developments aimed at bridging electrophysiology and functional MRI.

利用MRI和MEG探索人脑神经元电流成像的灵敏度极限。
传统的BOLD-fMRI依赖于血液动力学反应,这是神经活动在时间和空间上的间接标记。开发对神经电现象敏感的替代对比,是脑成像的一个关键挑战。自旋锁(SL)功能磁共振成像在检测与神经元活动相关的磁场变化的幻影研究中显示出前景,但其体内灵敏度和实用性尚不清楚。本研究以互补功能模式、脑磁图(MEG)和3T BOLD-fMRI为基准,评估了SL造影剂是否能有效检测和定位人类神经元的激活,以评估基于mri的神经元电流成像的敏感性。13名健康的年轻志愿者在8赫兹视觉刺激下进行了基于sl的成像,同时进行了BOLD和MEG采集。受试者观看象限棋盘刺激以引起局部皮层反应。采用两种平衡的SL对比机制,旋转激发(REX)和刺激诱导旋转饱和(SIRS)。采用回归滤波整流策略对目标刺激锁定信号波动进行后处理。幻影实验测试灵敏度和分析管道性能。脑磁图显示枕叶皮层有强烈的刺激锁定反应,估计局部磁场振幅为~0.07 nT。常规BOLD-fMRI证实可靠的血流动力学激活。相比之下,平衡的REX和平衡的SIRS在体内都没有产生一致的刺激相关激活。幻影实验随后得出REX的检测阈值为0.2 nT, SIRS的检测阈值为0.6 nT,超过了meg估计的生理场振幅。在目前的实验条件下,所测试的自旋锁功能磁共振成像实现没有达到足够的灵敏度来可靠地检测3T时的神经元磁场。基于幻像和meg的估计表明,视觉皮层的生理场振幅低于当前的检测极限。这些发现为MRI直接神经元电流成像建立了定量限制,并为未来旨在桥接电生理学和功能MRI的方法学发展提供了基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Brain Mapping
Human Brain Mapping 医学-核医学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
401
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Brain Mapping publishes peer-reviewed basic, clinical, technical, and theoretical research in the interdisciplinary and rapidly expanding field of human brain mapping. The journal features research derived from non-invasive brain imaging modalities used to explore the spatial and temporal organization of the neural systems supporting human behavior. Imaging modalities of interest include positron emission tomography, event-related potentials, electro-and magnetoencephalography, magnetic resonance imaging, and single-photon emission tomography. Brain mapping research in both normal and clinical populations is encouraged. Article formats include Research Articles, Review Articles, Clinical Case Studies, and Technique, as well as Technological Developments, Theoretical Articles, and Synthetic Reviews. Technical advances, such as novel brain imaging methods, analyses for detecting or localizing neural activity, synergistic uses of multiple imaging modalities, and strategies for the design of behavioral paradigms and neural-systems modeling are of particular interest. The journal endorses the propagation of methodological standards and encourages database development in the field of human brain mapping.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书