Multiomics Integration Reveals Coexpression Regulatory Networks in Osteoporosis and Osteosarcoma

Dongming Fu, Ran Li, Bo Wang
{"title":"Multiomics Integration Reveals Coexpression Regulatory Networks in Osteoporosis and Osteosarcoma","authors":"Dongming Fu,&nbsp;Ran Li,&nbsp;Bo Wang","doi":"10.1155/ijog/9619903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Osteoporosis and osteosarcoma impose a substantial and rising global health burden, yet their transcriptomic landscapes have not been systematically compared. We performed a multiomics characterization integrating bulk transcriptomics, coexpression network analysis, immune deconvolution, single-cell RNA sequencing, and diagnostic classifier construction.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Bulk transcriptomic profiling was performed using GSE56815 (circulating blood monocytes, <i>n</i> = 80; 40 low-BMD/40 high-BMD) and the TARGET-OS database (<i>n</i> = 88 osteosarcoma tumor samples; DNA methylation <i>n</i> = 86; copy number <i>n</i> = 81). Differential expression was assessed by Welch′s <i>t</i>-test with Benjamini–Hochberg correction. Coexpression modules were identified by hierarchical clustering of the Top 2000 most variable probes with dynamic tree cutting. A logistic regression classifier was constructed from the Top 20 differentially expressed probes using fivefold-stratified cross-validation. Single-cell RNA sequencing of an osteosarcoma tumor specimen (GEO accession GSM9030790) was processed with SVD-based dimensionality reduction and K-means clustering (<i>k</i> = 8; <i>n</i> = 3658 cells passing QC). In vitro validation was conducted by qRT-PCR in MC3T3-E1 osteoblast precursor cells and RAW264.7 osteoclast precursor cells.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Differential expression analysis identified 4347 probe sets at nominal <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05, of which 604 remained significant after Benjamini–Hochberg correction. Eight coexpression modules were identified; module M0 showed a weak positive association with low-BMD status (<i>r</i> = 0.184), which did not reach statistical significance. Six hub genes—SP7/Osterix, RUNX2, BMP2, WNT5A, DKK1, and SOST—were examined by qRT-PCR: SP7, RUNX2, BMP2, and WNT5A showed significant downregulation (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), whereas DKK1 showed significant upregulation (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) and SOST showed a nonsignificant trend toward upregulation under osteoporosis-simulating conditions. The diagnostic classifier achieved a moderate AUC of 0.693 (fivefold CV range: 0.48–0.91), with the lower bound falling below the random classifier baseline (AUC = 0.5), indicating limited discriminative capacity in some data partitions. scRNA-seq resolved eight transcriptionally distinct cell clusters in the osteosarcoma specimen (3658 cells passing QC).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This integrative multiomics study provides a comprehensive transcriptomic comparison of osteoporosis and osteosarcoma, identifies BMD-associated coexpression modules with experimentally validated hub genes, and establishes a reusable analytical framework for biomarker discovery in metabolic and malignant bone disease. However, the weak module-trait correlations, subthreshold classifier performance in some cross-validation folds, and the use of circulating blood monocytes to study bone-specific gene expression warrant cautious interpretation of the findings.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55239,"journal":{"name":"Comparative and Functional Genomics","volume":"2026 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13445564/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative and Functional Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ijog/9619903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Osteoporosis and osteosarcoma impose a substantial and rising global health burden, yet their transcriptomic landscapes have not been systematically compared. We performed a multiomics characterization integrating bulk transcriptomics, coexpression network analysis, immune deconvolution, single-cell RNA sequencing, and diagnostic classifier construction.

Methods

Bulk transcriptomic profiling was performed using GSE56815 (circulating blood monocytes, n = 80; 40 low-BMD/40 high-BMD) and the TARGET-OS database (n = 88 osteosarcoma tumor samples; DNA methylation n = 86; copy number n = 81). Differential expression was assessed by Welch′s t-test with Benjamini–Hochberg correction. Coexpression modules were identified by hierarchical clustering of the Top 2000 most variable probes with dynamic tree cutting. A logistic regression classifier was constructed from the Top 20 differentially expressed probes using fivefold-stratified cross-validation. Single-cell RNA sequencing of an osteosarcoma tumor specimen (GEO accession GSM9030790) was processed with SVD-based dimensionality reduction and K-means clustering (k = 8; n = 3658 cells passing QC). In vitro validation was conducted by qRT-PCR in MC3T3-E1 osteoblast precursor cells and RAW264.7 osteoclast precursor cells.

Results

Differential expression analysis identified 4347 probe sets at nominal p < 0.05, of which 604 remained significant after Benjamini–Hochberg correction. Eight coexpression modules were identified; module M0 showed a weak positive association with low-BMD status (r = 0.184), which did not reach statistical significance. Six hub genes—SP7/Osterix, RUNX2, BMP2, WNT5A, DKK1, and SOST—were examined by qRT-PCR: SP7, RUNX2, BMP2, and WNT5A showed significant downregulation (p < 0.01), whereas DKK1 showed significant upregulation (p < 0.01) and SOST showed a nonsignificant trend toward upregulation under osteoporosis-simulating conditions. The diagnostic classifier achieved a moderate AUC of 0.693 (fivefold CV range: 0.48–0.91), with the lower bound falling below the random classifier baseline (AUC = 0.5), indicating limited discriminative capacity in some data partitions. scRNA-seq resolved eight transcriptionally distinct cell clusters in the osteosarcoma specimen (3658 cells passing QC).

Conclusions

This integrative multiomics study provides a comprehensive transcriptomic comparison of osteoporosis and osteosarcoma, identifies BMD-associated coexpression modules with experimentally validated hub genes, and establishes a reusable analytical framework for biomarker discovery in metabolic and malignant bone disease. However, the weak module-trait correlations, subthreshold classifier performance in some cross-validation folds, and the use of circulating blood monocytes to study bone-specific gene expression warrant cautious interpretation of the findings.

多组学整合揭示骨质疏松症和骨肉瘤的共表达调控网络。
背景:骨质疏松症和骨肉瘤对全球健康造成了巨大且不断上升的负担,但它们的转录组学景观尚未得到系统的比较。我们进行了多组学表征,整合了大量转录组学、共表达网络分析、免疫反褶积、单细胞RNA测序和诊断分类器构建。方法:使用GSE56815(循环血液单核细胞,n = 80; 40个低骨密度/40个高骨密度)和targetos数据库(n = 88个骨肉瘤肿瘤样本;DNA甲基化n = 86;拷贝数n = 81)进行大量转录组分析。差异表达采用Welch’st检验,并经Benjamini-Hochberg校正。通过动态树切割对前2000个最可变探针进行分层聚类,确定共表达模块。使用五倍分层交叉验证,从前20个差异表达探针构建逻辑回归分类器。对骨肉瘤肿瘤标本(GEO accession GSM9030790)进行单细胞RNA测序,采用基于svd的降维和k -means聚类(k = 8; n = 3658个通过QC的细胞)。在MC3T3-E1成骨细胞前体细胞和RAW264.7破骨细胞前体细胞中进行qRT-PCR体外验证。结果:差异表达分析鉴定出4347个探针组,名义p < 0.05,其中604个探针组经Benjamini-Hochberg校正后仍具有显著性。共鉴定出8个共表达模块;模块M0与低骨密度状态呈弱正相关(r = 0.184),但无统计学意义。qRT-PCR检测6个枢纽基因SP7/Osterix、RUNX2、BMP2、WNT5A、DKK1、SOST:在骨质疏松模拟条件下,SP7、RUNX2、BMP2、WNT5A显著下调(p < 0.01), DKK1显著上调(p < 0.01), SOST无显著上调趋势。诊断分类器获得了0.693的中等AUC(五倍CV范围:0.48-0.91),下界低于随机分类器基线(AUC = 0.5),表明某些数据分区的判别能力有限。scRNA-seq在骨肉瘤标本中分离出8个转录不同的细胞簇(3658个细胞通过QC检测)。结论:这项综合多组学研究提供了骨质疏松症和骨肉瘤的全面转录组学比较,鉴定了bmd相关的共表达模块与实验验证的中心基因,并为代谢性和恶性骨病的生物标志物发现建立了一个可重复使用的分析框架。然而,弱的模块-性状相关性,交叉验证中的亚阈值分类器性能,以及使用循环血液单核细胞研究骨特异性基因表达需要谨慎解释研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Comparative and Functional Genomics
Comparative and Functional Genomics 生物-生化与分子生物学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书