Radiomics for risk stratification in brain metastases: potential in melanoma brain metastases.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Johanna Heugenhauser, Sabrina Herbst, Tamara Drucks, Christoph Scherfler, Tadeja Urbanic Purkart, Eva Maria Hassler, Richard Partl, Marlene Leoni, Kariem Mahdy Ali, Sarah Iglseder, Christian Freyschlag, Stephanie Mangesius, Astrid Grams, Meinhard Nevinny-Stickel, Martha Nowosielski
{"title":"Radiomics for risk stratification in brain metastases: potential in melanoma brain metastases.","authors":"Johanna Heugenhauser, Sabrina Herbst, Tamara Drucks, Christoph Scherfler, Tadeja Urbanic Purkart, Eva Maria Hassler, Richard Partl, Marlene Leoni, Kariem Mahdy Ali, Sarah Iglseder, Christian Freyschlag, Stephanie Mangesius, Astrid Grams, Meinhard Nevinny-Stickel, Martha Nowosielski","doi":"10.1007/s10585-026-10422-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The identification of quantitative non-invasive imaging biomarkers, including radiomics, may complement molecular characterization and thereby improve clinical management of neuro-oncological patients. We aimed to identify imaging predictors with improved performance over clinical parameters to stratify patients with brain metastases into high and low-risk groups for overall survival (OS). 422 patients recruited by two neuro-oncological centers were included with first diagnosis of brain metastases from different primary tumors. From each patient, 15 clinical parameters and a total of 321 radiomic features extracted from cerebral MRI were employed in prediction models to classify patients into low- and high-risk groups for OS. The best performing model was a bootstrap aggregating model including only clinical features (test set: macro F-1 = 0.62, accuracy = 0.72), while the combined and radiomic datasets led to poorer results (test set: macro F-1 = 0.60, accuracy = 0.67; test set: macro F-1 = 0.62, accuracy = 0.52, respectively). However, in the subgroup of melanoma patients (n = 54), the radiomic dataset showed better predictive power over clinical and combined dataset (test set: macro F-1 score = 0.71, accuracy = 0.77). 80% and 67% of melanoma patients were correctly classified into the low- and the high-risk group for OS, respectively. Clinical features remained the strongest predictors of risk across patients with brain metastases from different primary tumors. Although, in melanoma patients, radiomic features provided better prediction of the survival outcome compared to clinical parameters alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":10267,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Experimental Metastasis","volume":"43 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13451392/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical & Experimental Metastasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-026-10422-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The identification of quantitative non-invasive imaging biomarkers, including radiomics, may complement molecular characterization and thereby improve clinical management of neuro-oncological patients. We aimed to identify imaging predictors with improved performance over clinical parameters to stratify patients with brain metastases into high and low-risk groups for overall survival (OS). 422 patients recruited by two neuro-oncological centers were included with first diagnosis of brain metastases from different primary tumors. From each patient, 15 clinical parameters and a total of 321 radiomic features extracted from cerebral MRI were employed in prediction models to classify patients into low- and high-risk groups for OS. The best performing model was a bootstrap aggregating model including only clinical features (test set: macro F-1 = 0.62, accuracy = 0.72), while the combined and radiomic datasets led to poorer results (test set: macro F-1 = 0.60, accuracy = 0.67; test set: macro F-1 = 0.62, accuracy = 0.52, respectively). However, in the subgroup of melanoma patients (n = 54), the radiomic dataset showed better predictive power over clinical and combined dataset (test set: macro F-1 score = 0.71, accuracy = 0.77). 80% and 67% of melanoma patients were correctly classified into the low- and the high-risk group for OS, respectively. Clinical features remained the strongest predictors of risk across patients with brain metastases from different primary tumors. Although, in melanoma patients, radiomic features provided better prediction of the survival outcome compared to clinical parameters alone.

放射组学对脑转移的风险分层:黑色素瘤脑转移的潜力。
定量非侵入性成像生物标志物的鉴定,包括放射组学,可以补充分子表征,从而改善神经肿瘤患者的临床管理。我们的目的是确定优于临床参数的影像学预测指标,将脑转移患者分为高风险组和低风险组,以获得总生存期(OS)。两个神经肿瘤中心招募了422名首次诊断为不同原发肿瘤脑转移的患者。从每个患者中提取15个临床参数和总计321个脑MRI放射学特征用于预测模型,将患者分为OS的低危组和高危组。表现最好的模型是仅包含临床特征的bootstrap聚合模型(测试集:macro F-1 = 0.62,准确性= 0.72),而组合和放射学数据集的结果较差(测试集:macro F-1 = 0.60,准确性= 0.67;测试集:macro F-1 = 0.62,准确性= 0.52)。然而,在黑色素瘤患者亚组(n = 54)中,放射组数据集比临床和联合数据集显示出更好的预测能力(测试集:宏观F-1评分= 0.71,准确性= 0.77)。80%和67%的黑色素瘤患者分别被正确地划分为OS的低风险组和高风险组。临床特征仍然是不同原发肿瘤患者脑转移风险的最强预测因子。尽管在黑色素瘤患者中,放射学特征比单独的临床参数更能预测生存结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Journal''s scope encompasses all aspects of metastasis research, whether laboratory-based, experimental or clinical and therapeutic. It covers such areas as molecular biology, pharmacology, tumor biology, and clinical cancer treatment (with all its subdivisions of surgery, chemotherapy and radio-therapy as well as pathology and epidemiology) insofar as these disciplines are concerned with the Journal''s core subject of metastasis formation, prevention and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书